FTWW #41: Show vs. Tell

My dear intellectually curious friends,

This is For Those Who Wonder (FTWW) #41 and this week we are going to discuss show vs. tell.

Woody Allen famously said that “showing up is 80 percent of life.” Unless you have impeccable intuition and an astute sense of the right time and place, showing up is only the basic pre-requisite.

Age is a strong heuristic that colors our perception of the people we interact with, their place in a hierarchy and the extent to which we believe they can deliver on their commitments relative to the complexity of the challenge. The younger we are and the more challenging the endeavor, the less credibility is given to our efforts.

Those younger than us are given leeway for failing to deliver. “It’s okay, they’re still young, they don’t understand or aren’t mature enough yet,” we say. Those older than us are conversely reprimanded for failing to keep their word. “They should know better than to overpromise, that was irresponsible of them,” is how we typically think. If life were a video game, the points gained for responsibly sticking to your word is an asymmetrical payoff, with the older of us getting the short end of the stick.

However, this stereotype reverses itself when viewing age through the lens of executing on new ideas. Those younger are summarily dismissed as idealistic, unrealistic or incapable of understanding the nuances of the situation. The same slack we give them when they fail drains the flexibility and trust we place in them when they come to us, bright-eyed and bushy-tailed, with an idea.

The older counterparts have free reign. They are assumed to have been thoughtful and thorough, understanding which ideas are realistic and which are not. They just have to say the word they’ve got about as much rope as they can hang themselves with.

Notwithstanding social norms with respect to the asymmetrical nature of our perception of ability and dependability relative to age, there is a way for the young to be heard, their ideas to be taken seriously and their efforts to deliver value.

We give credence to the idea that age-dependent reliability is correlated with maturity, but I tend to believe that age and maturity are quite different. Mature people are presumed to be sensible, responsible and pragmatic. Yet the factors that drive our evaluation of a persons’ maturity leans more towards actions for the young and mere words for the old.

When we are young, we have to show not tell, persistently proving our value through proactive initiatives, ambition and a determination to persevere through failure. We take any chance we get and run with it, keep running and don’t stop until we have to ask for forgiveness because no one will ever give us permission. Don’t worry, if we fail, they weren’t expecting much of us anyway.

Yet, when we are older, our reputation is derived by the merit of our word as we havesupposedly already done all the “showing up.” A word that only becomes invalid if the facade put up to support it melts away. This dynamics leads me to wonder if the system of the young paying up front for reputation vs. others who carry their reputation on loan has caused us to dismiss too easily, people and ideas based purely on the age of their vessel.

Nonetheless, heuristics exist for a reason as typically age dependent perception of value add is correlated to persistence early on and reputation later on. It is also correlated to our stage in life and the societal perception of what we should be doing at that point in our lives. Kids play outside while adults have serious business to attend to.

Still, it is the exception that proves the rule and rule should remind us to look out for the exception. In reality, sometimes the children are the real adults in the room and maybe their ideas aren’t so bad. Have you been outside to play lately?

Sharing is caring — forward this to a friend, like our page on Facebook and follow along on Medium.

I encourage all feedback and appreciate any responses that bring a new perspective or challenge my reasoning. Together our ideas can change the world.

“Not having time’ is code for not thinking it’s important enough.” — Michael Troiano

[SCIENCE] Phil Kennedy dedicated his life to the dream of building cyborgs and developing a way to fully digitize a person’s thoughts. His obsession led to him hacking his own brain and almost losing his mind. We are a long way from truly understanding how the brain operates.

Ever wonder why we have allergies? Perhaps it is an evolutionary self-protection mechanism.

Despite improving health trends globally, I’ve always wondered why tobacco companies were not struggling more. The answer: China. The Chinese Government Is Getting Rich Selling Cigarettes.

The 2016 Thought Leadership Forum brings with it eye-opening ideas and lessons. This year’s theme: “What Being Wrong Can Teach You About Being Right.”

Recently came across Zensorium Tinké and had to suppress the urge to buy it. All these new health tracking devices seem quite appealing, but at the end of the day they just provide data, not suggestions or solutions. Has anyone come across a way to derive actionable improvements from the data they collect?


[SELF] How do we find our passion? A question asked ad nauseam. Jason Silva does a great job breaking down the most concise and logical steps to figuring it out your passion. The video was based on this article by Steven Kotler of the Flow Genome Project. Thanks to JY for sharing.

Shane Parish, author of one of my favorite blogs, Farnam Street, joins the Science of Success podcast to talk about: How To Stop Living Your Life On Autopilot, Take Control, and Build a Toolbox of Mental Models to Understand Reality.

“You must know the big ideas in the big disciplines, and use them routinely — all of them, not just a few. Most people are trained in one model — economics, for example — and try to solve all problems in one way. You know the old saying: to the man with a hammer, the world looks like a nail. This is a dumb way of handling problems.” — Charlie Munger


[MISC] From Winnie Cooper to math whiz. This is quite an interesting story on how a retired TV star avoided getting pigeon-holed by her past and went on to discover a mathematical theorem.

A visualization of some of history’s senseless violent conflicts in deaths per hour.

How Do You Start Writing Online? Writing is about creating relationships, growing and testing your thought process against the world.

Building on the 1,000 True Fans philosophy –How to Hack the Music Industry: The Audience Problem

“If the twentieth-century entertainment industry was about hits, the twenty-first will be equally about niches.” — Chris Anderson

Enjoy!

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.