Languages Change.

M. Soledad Berdazaiz
Global Literary Theory
5 min readNov 3, 2024

--

Why are people reluctant to acknowledge this?

A Giulia, che mi illumina sempre con le sue argomentazioni.

Let’s think of language, in its broadest sense, as a series of concentric circles, the largest one being Language. Now let’s imagine that within Language there is a smaller circle called Accent, encompassing regional sounds and words. Inside Accent lies Dialect, the distinct expressions of a given geographical area.

Delving deeper, we find Sociolect, which reflects the language of specific social groups, like that of lawyers, children, and so on. At the center of it is “idiolect,” an individual’s unique way of speaking, deeply rooted in personal experience.

The myth of a standard language

Recently, I engaged in quite a heated discussion with a friend who feels bothered when people don’t speak “correctly.” Her position reflects a common sentiment, especially in Italy, where regional dialects coexist with one “standard” Italian taught in schools.

Even though standardization is necessary to bring some unity into a vast geographical area, it is only to be expected that there are variations. We have seen that variability is an intrinsic feature of language. So, why is the general tendency to judge certain ways of speaking as right or wrong? More importantly, who…

--

--

Global Literary Theory
Global Literary Theory

Published in Global Literary Theory

Global Literary Theory (ISSN 3049–8724) brings world literatures into comparison. We are interested in the aesthetics of politics and the politics of aesthetics, and in supporting writers from all around the world. Medium’s only quadrilingual publication.

M. Soledad Berdazaiz
M. Soledad Berdazaiz

Written by M. Soledad Berdazaiz

Eng<>Spa translator | writer | avid reader | languages enthusiast. Born in Patagonia, currently in Italy. https://soledad-berdazaiz.onrender.com/

Responses (24)