Trade War Ramps Back Up

After a five-month hiatus, Trump increases tariffs on Chinese goods to 25%.

Michelle Klieger
Apr 23, 2019 · 4 min read
Image for post
Image for post
Photo by UX Gun on Unsplash

For the last 18 months, the entire world has been watching the U.S.-Chinese geopolitical soap opera. There’s been a lot of whiplash as the trade war rapidly ratcheted up, then a truce was signed over an Argentine dinner, and now with less than a week’s notice, a new wave of tariffs was being imposed, ending the truce. This abrupt action happened as negotiations were supposedly edging toward a conclusion after months of trade teams crisscrossing the globe for alternating weekly meetings in Beijing and Washington. It’s hard to guess what will happen next. Sometimes it’s difficult to make sense of what’s already happened.

Looking back, it’s hard to say for sure what motivated the United States to impose tariffs on $260 billion of Chinese imports, an action that would provoke China. In return, China imposed counter-tariffs on nearly $110 billion of U.S. products headed for China. These new taxes have had a major impact on Americans and Chinese alike. The tariffs were a strong action to take against China, especially when debatably less severe actions had not yet been exhausted.

Looking for the catalyst behind the tariffs does not shed a lot of light on the situation. Was Trump’s motivation purely economic? Did he want better market access, stronger intellectual property production and a stronger footing in Asia for American companies? Most experts argue that the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement was a better tool for achieving this goal.

Was the impetus political? Was TPP out because it was too closely associated with President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton? Bilateral talks were started under President Bush and expanded under Obama. But they never worked. Did Trump decide to take a different approach? Or maybe it was the perceived threat to the United States’ hegemony posed by China’s increasing economic, military, and technological power. In this case, tariffs are meant to weaken China. Understanding the motivations would help map out possible conclusions.

Outside of motivation, time is another critical factor in these negotiations. Trump wants this situation settled as quickly as possible. But again it’s unclear why speed is so important. Traditionally, agreements between aligned countries can take years to work out, not months like Trump was hoping for.

Maybe Trump wanted a quick win. If that is the case, he underestimated China’s long game. With 5,000 years of history, China rarely thinks in terms of years like many other countries. China thinks in terms of decades or even centuries. Maybe the impact of the trade war’s taxes and indirect costs are larger than Trump expected. Looking back, the trade war ramped up during a period of stronger economic data, but the trade truce was signed when the stock market was falling.

As you can tell, this is a complex topic with many moving pieces. Public opinion, economic data, military drills, and major domestic corporations (like Boeing and Huawei) all factor into the direction the talks are taking each day. These other topics influence how much each side is willing to give and for that matter, what concession each side is willing to make. With the natural ebb and flow of normal negotiations, it’s difficult to come to an agreement on the details. Then cultural differences and domestic opposition to agreements must be factored in.

For all of these reasons, trade agreements are difficult to write. They are not high-level documents that lay out the framework for an agreement between two countries, rather they are the details. Their text becomes the lines and lines of legal jargon that defines trade between the two countries. Which, hopefully, explains why it’s crazy to think that the United States and China could reach an agreement in a few months. But maybe Trumps’ non-traditional methods can achieve real progress where previous leaders failed. Maybe his version of diplomacy will be effective and creating quick and rapid changes in the U.S.-China relationship. But with the trade truce ending, and no discussion of tariff removal, it seems the current tariff environment could be a new normal.


If you want to understand what has happened & what to look for in the coming months, sign up for my upcoming ebook.

It will cover:

  • A timeline and explanation of the last 18 months.
  • Changes that are already starting to happen
  • Possible next steps in 2019 and beyond

Sign up here.

Originally published at

Goods & Services

An approachable guide to world trade and the global economy

Medium is an open platform where 170 million readers come to find insightful and dynamic thinking. Here, expert and undiscovered voices alike dive into the heart of any topic and bring new ideas to the surface. Learn more

Follow the writers, publications, and topics that matter to you, and you’ll see them on your homepage and in your inbox. Explore

If you have a story to tell, knowledge to share, or a perspective to offer — welcome home. It’s easy and free to post your thinking on any topic. Write on Medium

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store