On-Premises Kubernetes Vs Managed Kubernetes

Kubernetes, the powerful orchestration tool for managing containerised applications, can be deployed in various ways. The two most common methods are on-premises Kubernetes and managed Kubernetes. Let’s break down these options using simple analogies from everyday life to help you understand their differences and decide which one might be the best fit for your situation.

Image by Author

On-Premises Kubernetes: DIY Approach

Think of on-premises Kubernetes like owning a car. When you own a car:

1. Purchase and Setup: You buy the car, which can be expensive, and you are responsible for all the setup, such as choosing the model, color, and features.

2. Maintenance: You handle all the maintenance, from oil changes to brake repairs. This means you need to know how to take care of the car or hire someone who does.

3. Control: You have full control over the car. You decide when and where to drive it, and you can customize it to your heart’s content.

4. Costs: While you have upfront costs and ongoing maintenance expenses, there are no monthly rental fees.

In the same way, on-premises Kubernetes means:

• Infrastructure Ownership: You own the servers and hardware where Kubernetes runs. You need to purchase, set up, and maintain this infrastructure.

• Full Control: You have complete control over your Kubernetes environment. You can customize it extensively to fit your specific needs.

• Maintenance Responsibility: You are responsible for all updates, patches, and monitoring of the system. This requires a team with the right expertise.

• Cost Considerations: While there are significant upfront costs for hardware and software, you avoid the recurring costs associated with cloud services.

Managed Kubernetes: Renting a Car

Managed Kubernetes is like renting a car:

1. Easy Access: You choose a car from the rental company, and they provide you with a ready-to-drive vehicle. No need to worry about the buying process.

2. Maintenance-Free: The rental company handles all maintenance and repairs. If the car breaks down, they give you another one.

3. Convenience: You can rent the car only when you need it, without worrying about long-term commitments or maintenance.

4. Recurring Costs: You pay a rental fee, which covers the use of the car and the maintenance services.

Managed Kubernetes works similarly:

• Service Provider: A cloud provider like Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE), Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS), or Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) manages the infrastructure.

• Ease of Use: The provider handles the setup, maintenance, and updates, making it easier to start and operate.

• Maintenance-Free: The cloud provider takes care of all updates, security patches, and monitoring, reducing the burden on your team.

• Recurring Costs: You pay for the service based on usage, which can be more predictable and scalable than owning infrastructure.

Which One is Best for You?

Choosing between on-premises and managed Kubernetes depends on your specific needs and situation. Let’s consider a few scenarios:

On-Premises Kubernetes is Best If:

1. Full Control Needed: You require full control over your infrastructure due to regulatory requirements, data sovereignty issues, or specific customization needs.

2. Existing Infrastructure: You already have a significant investment in on-premises hardware and want to utilize it effectively.

3. Cost Management: You prefer the upfront investment in hardware over recurring costs associated with cloud services, especially if

Managed Kubernetes is Best If:

1. Scalability: You need the flexibility to scale your operations up or down based on demand without investing in physical hardware. This is especially beneficial for startups and businesses experiencing rapid growth or fluctuating workloads.
2. Expertise: You lack the in-house expertise necessary to manage a Kubernetes environment effectively. Managed services provide access to a team of experts who handle the complexities of Kubernetes operations.
3. Speed: You want to get your applications up and running as quickly as possible without the delays associated with setting up and maintaining an on-premises infrastructure.

Decision Factors

Here are some additional factors to consider when deciding between on-premises and managed Kubernetes:

• Compliance and Security: Depending on your industry, compliance requirements might dictate where and how you manage your data. While cloud providers offer high standards of security and often comply with a wide range of regulations, certain data might need to be kept in-house under specific circumstances.
• Long-Term Costs: While managed Kubernetes can be more expensive in the long run, the trade-off comes with reduced responsibilities and potentially lower operational risks. Conversely, on-premises Kubernetes might result in higher upfront costs but lower ongoing operational costs.
• Innovation and Upgrades: Cloud providers continuously update their services to offer the latest features and security enhancements. With on-premises Kubernetes, your team will need to manage these updates manually, which can delay access to new features.

That’s it….
It’s up to you whether you choose to buy a car or rent it out. It depends upon your financial and techinical requirements and situation.

Thanks for reading 🙏
If you wish to read more such content, consider following The kube guy and also don’t forget to subscribe so that you won’t miss anything.