What is Healthicine? What is the theory of Healthicine? What is the philosophy of Healthicine?

What is healthicine?

Is it a word? (it’s not in the dictionary). Is it theory? Is it a practice? Philosophers contemplate the difference between theory and reality — and wonder if reality is just another theory. Mathematicians and scientists define everything as a theory, to be tested. That’s their theory, and they practice it diligently. Eastern philosophies and the martial arts teach that the difference between theory and practice is “practice”. Practice, practice, practice. Comedians joke “in theory, theory and practice are the same, in practice, they are not.”

Is healthicine a theory. Not really. Healthicine is a lens. A way of looking at things. A tool we can use to see things differently.

Medicine also, is not a theory. It is a practice of technologies to define, diagnose and treat diseases. Medicine is a tool, a set of tools. Medicine is a powerful lens, or set of lenses, that we use to zoom in and focus on illness, on diagnosis, and on treatments.

However, when we try to use the medicine lens to view, create, and enhance healthiness, or worse, to ‘diagnose’ healthiness, — we’re looking backwards through the telescope. The closer we get to the truth, the farther away it appears. And our vision is always distorted.

How can we tell if SOMETHING is ‘good for your health’. Is drinking coffee healthy? Is chocolate good for you? Does red wine make you healthier? You will find consistently that the answers are “yes it is”, and “no it is not”, “yes it does”, and “no it does not”. This happens because we are using a medicine lens on healthicine.

Medicine is designed to detect, measure and treat disease. Healthicine is designed to measure, enhance, optimize healthiness.

Medicine is like a telescope, or a microscope. It focuses on specific details, it magnifies them, searching for danger.

Healthicine is like a wide angle lens. It views the landscape as well as the trees. Healthiness is about wholeness, not about a problem in a specific area. When we study from a whole viewpoint we can then see specific areas more clearly.

Did you ever wonder how someone who is ‘healthy’ can suddenly become very sick — even die in a short time? When we use the medicine lens to search for healthiness, we search and search, but we don’t find any disease— so we assume healthiness. It’s like the Star Trek spoof, where the doctor reports: I’m not picking up anything on my tricorder scan. He seems perfectly healthy. The tricorder is a medical tool — it only measures illness and cannot find healthiness.

Medicine often cannot see the forest, for the trees. There are many cases where unhealthiness exists and builds for year and years — and the patient is judged ‘healthy’, because no illness is present. Then suddenly, when disease is diagnosed — disease does not exist until it is diagnosed — it is too late.

Then the medical experts say “we need early detection tools”. Duh… Earlier detection makes the problem worse, not better. It sees more trees, and less healthiness. It soon starts to see more trees (diseases) where there are no trees (false positives), but it still doesn’t see healthiness.

We need to study healthiness, we need to measure healthiness — in order to learn to optimize our health.

We need to use a health paradigm, a healthicine lens, not an illness paradigm — to learn about health.

We need a science of healthicine. We need tools of healthicine. We need principles of healthicine and healthiness. We need many different views of and opinions about of healthicine — today we have but one (this blog). I will be happier when I actually have someone to argue with.

to your health, tracy healthicine.org

Originally published at healthicine.org on December 17, 2012.

Like what you read? Give Tracy Kolenchuk a round of applause.

From a quick cheer to a standing ovation, clap to show how much you enjoyed this story.