Humanism Now
Published in

Humanism Now

Religions, Shoes, and Cobblers

When did people start changing their religion? By which I mean, when did people begin to have the option of saying, “This religion isn’t working for me, I’m choosing that one.”

a row of small plastic communion cups

Trading up. Trading down. Trading.

We don’t know exactly how religion developed among human beings, but I think it’s safe to say that evidence indicates that at one time most human groups believed a common set of things about the nature of their reality. Perhaps religious professionals were involved, perhaps not. These beliefs were probably at first quite localized.

However, somewhere along the line, changing religions became an option for many people. (And I should quickly add a caveat: For some people, changing their religion isn’t an option to this day. But let’s say we are talking about the lucky ones. The ones with choice.)

Was that moment the one when one group met up with another and began talking? Along the Silk Road, say; or among the entourage of Alexander the Great’s army? However, it happened, somewhere along the line, changing religion — or at least adding onto an existing one — became a possibility.

After all, it appears that denizens of the Roman world had the option of choosing more than one.

Ascendant Christianity took care of the all-of-the-above option, insisting upon “saved” or “damned.” Binary. However, Christianity also sowed the seeds of its own destruction in that it showed people that they could change their religion totally, eschewing all past models.

As the Christians moved north, they chopped down the sacred groves of past religions, also demonstrating that religious power was political power. And we know what many people think of politics, don’t we?

And so, here we are. In the United States, anyway, the consumer model of religion has become such a part of American culture that you can change your religion just as easily and as often as you change your hair style. In this, too, Christianity has demonstrated the way to its own demise: If I can be Baptist and then become Episcopalian, why can’t I move from there to Buddhism? Or “none”?

Well, chances are you can.

Sticking with the consumer model a moment: some people don’t need shoes; some don’t care about shoes; and others will take whatever pair is easiest at hand.

Making the job of cobblers difficult.

--

--

--

#Humanism is a grass-roots, global movement of #Freethinkers and free thinkers.

Recommended from Medium

Killing the Sacred Cows of Church

The Book of Ecclesiasticus (Sirach)

The Book of Ecclesiasticus (Sirach)

Restitution is not Restoration

Why You Should Read G.K. Chesterton

Seventh Sunday in Ordinary Time — 02/20/2022

Seventh Sunday in Ordinary Time – 02/20/2022

Looking to Jesus?

God Forms Me

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
David Breeden

David Breeden

Poet, Senior Minister at First Unitarian Society of Minneapolis, a Humanist congregation. Amazon author's page amazon.com/author/davidbreeden

More from Medium

Schismogenesis: Seeing How We’ve Got Nothing in Common

Atheist In The Bible Belt

The Bible Is Not About The Origins Of Things

Deposing God: Why Are There So Many Religions?