Major changes coming for farmers: National Climate Assessment

Ben Lilliston
Jan 4, 2019 · 3 min read
Used under creative commons license from diversey

Climate-driven disruptions for U.S. farmers will accelerate in severity and cost in the coming decades, the National Climate Assessment, authored by 13 federal agencies, concluded. While the assessment was written “to help inform decision-makers, utility and natural resource managers, public health officials, emergency planners, and other stakeholders,” it was quietly released by the Trump administration the day after Thanksgiving. A few days later President Trump tried to dismiss the risks posed by climate change claiming, “I don’t believe it.”

The assessment points out risks across the U.S. economy, particularly for agriculture and other natural resource-based sectors. The Agriculture and Rural Communities chapter outlines a series of daunting climate-related concerns, including “increased rates of crop failure, reduced livestock productivity, and altered rates of pressure from pests, weeds, and diseases.” The report also acknowledges the risks to outdoor workers, concluding that migrant workers are particularly vulnerable, as IATP has previously written.

The assessment identifies a series of needed adaptation strategies for farmers to cope with climate change, such as altering the types of crops grown and implementing sustainable practices including crop rotations, cover crops and better irrigation management. Livestock production will also require adaptation strategies, including “managing heat stress by altering diets, providing adequate shade and clean drinking water supplies, monitoring stock rates continuously to match forage availability.” The assessment warned that while these strategies can strengthen resilience for farmers, they are not enough on their own to protect farms from the severe impacts of climate change.

Rural communities are facing a “climate gap,” the assessment noted (something IATP has long been saying). Rural areas will be disproportionately impacted by climate change, partially due to greater poverty. In addition, aging rural infrastructure is more vulnerable to climate stressors. Individuals and communities that rely on agriculture as an economic driver face doubly serious impacts, the assessment concluded.

The financial risks of climate inaction are steep. To avoid the worst-case scenario economic burden, the assessment calls for expanding climate adaptation planning across the country. Climate adaptation strategies would have some upfront costs but would “yield benefits in excess of their costs in the near term, as well as over the long term.”

Climate planning for agriculture is critical. An IATP report earlier this year found that only 18 states have climate adaptation plans that address agriculture, and that many of those agriculture plans were too general and aspirational, disconnected from the policies or resources required for implementation. Given the findings of the National Climate Assessment, more states need to step up, and the states with existing plans must evaluate and strengthen their actions.

The findings of the National Climate Assessment are consistent with past findings on climate and agriculture, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report in October. It also came only days before a Congressional agreement on a new Farm Bill was announced and the signing of a new North American Free Trade Agreement. Neither deal, with deep and wide-ranging implications for U.S. agriculture, acknowledges climate change or attempts to address the rising risks for farmers around the country.

As countries reached an agreement in December on how to implement the Paris Climate Agreement, President Trump’s announced plans to withdraw from the climate deal is further isolating the U.S. from global plans of action. U.S. policymakers continue to lag far behind the scientific consensus on climate change — leaving our farmers and rural communities increasingly vulnerable.

IATP

The Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy works…

Ben Lilliston

Written by

Ben Lilliston is the Director of Rural Strategies and Climate Change at the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy.

IATP

IATP

The Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems

Ben Lilliston

Written by

Ben Lilliston is the Director of Rural Strategies and Climate Change at the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy.

IATP

IATP

The Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems

Medium is an open platform where 170 million readers come to find insightful and dynamic thinking. Here, expert and undiscovered voices alike dive into the heart of any topic and bring new ideas to the surface. Learn more

Follow the writers, publications, and topics that matter to you, and you’ll see them on your homepage and in your inbox. Explore

If you have a story to tell, knowledge to share, or a perspective to offer — welcome home. It’s easy and free to post your thinking on any topic. Write on Medium

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store