“Anti-Racism” Is Becoming Troublingly Racist
You’re not supposed to talk about how frustrating it is to watch children screw things up. You’re supposed to be patient when it takes them seventeen minutes to tie their shoelaces. You’re supposed to applaud their migraine-inducing attempts to play the violin. You’re supposed to give your undivided attention as they tell stories that somehow lack a beginning, a middle and an end.
But worst of all is when a child wants to “help” you with something. You know that accepting their help will quadruple the time, energy and resources required to get anything done. You realise that it’d be far simpler to do the job yourself. You’re aware that they’ll get bored halfway through and give up. But what are you supposed to tell them? They’re so enthusiastic, so earnest, so eager to contribute. So you take a deep breath, grit your teeth into a smile, and watch them make a mess.
If you’ve been watching the trajectory of anti-racism over the past few years you can probably relate. It’s become an exercise in patiently explaining things which should be painfully obvious. It’s become an endless parade of clickbait headlines and performative outrage. It’s become dominated by people who seem as if they want to help but are hopelessly confused about how to do so.
Take, for example, Brentwood School’s recently announced plans to segregate parent/teacher meetings by race, as part of their (and I’m not kidding here) “Inclusive Excellence Racial Equity” initiative. White parents will meet with white teachers, black parents will meet with black teachers, Hispanic parents with Hispanic teachers. I presume that interracial families will need to separate in the name of progress.
If a child had an idea this asinine, it would be easier to cope. You could explain in clear, age-appropriate language, why racial segregation is not the best path to “inclusive excellence”. You could point out that while some parents may have issues directly related to their race, preventing other parents and teachers from hearing them is likely to make those problems worse. You could remind them in your gentlest, most tender-hearted voice, that classifying people by race promotes racism, rather than…what was it again? Oh yes, INCLUSIVE EXCELLENCE AND RACIAL EQUITY!!!
Or there’s Meyerholz Elementary School, where eight-year-old children are instructed to rank themselves according to the power and privilege of their race, gender and sexuality. It’s how you might reimagine Jane Elliott’s famous “brown eyes, blue eyes” experiment if you utterly failed to understand it.
These children aren’t learning to look beyond their superficial differences. They aren’t being taught the importance of treating others with compassion. They’re learning, at eight years old, that the most fundamental aspects of who they are will forever mark them as “oppressor” or “oppressed”. They’re learning to think of each other as a collection of labels instead of as complex human beings. They’ll likely carry the hangover of this “education” for the rest of their lives.
Then we have the people who treat racism as if it’s a treasure hunt. They scurry around in search of increasingly abstract, petty, “blink and you’ll miss it” forms of racism to submit for our approval. Gardening, rocks, Mozart, knitting, the countryside, cycling, floristry, fast food (but also veganism), all of these and more have been “called out” in the name of anti-racism. Even worse, respected news organisations uncritically publish this nonsense so that everybody can see how “woke” they are.
If I were a more cynical person, I might suspect that these people aren’t trying to fight racism at all. I might ask whether headlines like “Can Dogs Be Racist?“ are designed to do anything more than attract clicks and advertising dollars. I might even suggest that the people who write this garbage are motivated by nothing more than greed and the desire to collect virtue-signalling brownie points on Twitter.
And while I’d like to give them the pat on the head they’re so desperately seeking, it’s hard to ignore the fact that every column inch wasted on “articles” about whether “The Smurfs” was racist, could have been used to write about real issues. After all, the fact that black male offenders still receive prison sentences which are, on average, 20% longer than white offenders for the same crime or that black families are only half as likely to own their homes as white families or that there are still serious disparities in treatment and outcomes for minority students, all feel a little bit more pressing.
Last, but by no means least infuriating, are the saviours. People who are so excited to show off what they learned during their mandatory diversity training, that they haven’t noticed (or simply don’t care) how racist they’re being.
These are the people who target black police officers at protests so that they can scream in their faces about black rights. Or turn up at Black Lives Matter rallies with whip marks painted on their bodies without the tiniest glimmer of self-awareness. The same people who explain that people of colour need special treatment if we turn up late for appointments because it’s “culturally insensitive” to expect us to demonstrate time management skills. The same people who have taken terms like “white supremacy” and diluted their meaning to the point that we’re losing the ability to differentiate between benign ignorance and true hatred.
Watching these “allies” blunder their way around the anti-racism landscape feels like watching a toddler trying to perform open-heart surgery. The stakes are too high. The mistakes are too costly. The constant distractions make it too difficult to focus on the issues that matter. And while I want to believe that their hearts (if not their brains) are in the right place, it’s time to be blunt.
So on behalf of everybody who has a stake in this fight, this “help” is not helping. You’re pushing regressive policies and calling them progress. You’re squandering opportunities to say something meaningful by writing garbage clickbait. You’re framing the fight for equality as a battle between “whiteness” and “blackness” when, if you were a little wiser, you’d know that it’s always required people of all colours.
Look, I promise, as soon as we’ve finished making the world a safer and fairer place for people of colour, we’ll move straight onto pressing issues like why so many robots are white. We’ll conduct a thorough investigation into the racist history of peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. We’ll answer all of your questions about why racial segregation is not a marker of progress. But until then, why don’t you go and play with your toys or something? The grownups have important work to do.