Blindly Praising Your Child’s Performance Undermines Their Motivation

Darshana Menon
ILLUMINATION
Published in
5 min readMar 24, 2024
Photo by Kostiantyn Li on Unsplash

Introduction

Hey there, I’m Darshana and I came across this research paper I’d like to discuss briefly that beautifully embodies the runway that led to the discovery of the growth mindset is a paper from Dr. Carol Dweck, as well as her colleague, Claudia Mueller. And the title of the paper essentially says it all. The title is Praise for Intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance (actual study link), right? It should be surprising that praise for intelligence can undermine motivation and performance. I would’ve thought, and I think many people probably believe that if you tell a child or an adult that they’re good at something and you’re genuine about that feedback, meaning they’re performing well, and you say, great, you’re doing well, you’re so smart, you’re so talented, that their performance would continue to improve, that it would bolster their motivation to engage in that activity, which hopefully they enjoy. But regardless, provided that it’s a safe activity, it’s educational, what have you, that it would serve to encourage them, right? The kid thinks not only am I engaging in this activity, but I’m getting positive feedback, presumably from people that I care about or whose opinion I care about, wouldn’t that serve to elevate performance? It does NOT. The exact opposite happens.

Understanding the Study

The way it was done is very interesting. They essentially gave feedback about performance that was linked up with a child’s intelligence, telling the kid they’re smart, they’re talented, that they can learn things easily, or that they’re very good at learning this sort of thing, and they called that intelligence feedback. Or they gave them what was called effort feedback. The simple way to think about effort feedback is that it’s more attached to verbs as opposed to labels. So effort, feedback consists of things like you tried really hard on that problem, it was great the way that you applied effort, it was great the way that you persisted, it was great the way that even when you got the wrong answer, you spent 10 minutes thinking about it and then you tried again and again, or in some cases, even if they didn’t get the right answer telling them, well, even though you didn’t get the right answer, it’s terrific that you continue to try, okay?

Key Findings

In this study, which included over a hundred children, they either got the intelligence type feedback or the effort type feedback, or there was a control group that didn’t get either the intelligence or the effort type feedback, and then they looked at several different outcomes. So I’ll just highlight a few examples of what they found. First of all, the kids that got the intelligence based feedback when they were then later offered problem sets that were either challenging or were of the sort that they knew they could perform well on, tended to select problems that they knew they could perform well on. These were what were referred to as performance goals. In other words, they picked problems that allowed them to continue to get the praise that they had received previously about being smart or talented. Whereas the kids that got feedback about their strong effort when later presented with problems that were either easy or hard, more often than not, they picked the harder problems that stood to teach them more.

Insights for Parenting and Teaching

So what does this tell us? This tells us that the narratives that we hear from others, of course, reinforce certain patterns of behavior. What else does this tell us? This tells us that if you’re a parent or teacher, you have to be very careful about giving feedback to a child that is attached to their identity around an endeavor, especially if they’re performing well at that endeavor, right? Now, of course, if a child is not performing well at something, you also don’t want to tell them that they’re stupid, right? You don’t want to tell them that they’re deficient, right? But, that’s a rare occurrence in the classroom one would hope, that’s a rare occurrence on the field, one would hope. But what’s very common, very, very common is that when we see children or adults performing well, we tend to give them identity labels as a way to try and reinforce whatever behavior we observe and we like.

Implications and Recommendations

The other thing they looked at in this study, besides whether or not these kids would pick hard or easier challenges down the line was the actual raw performance on cognitive problems. And these data, I must say, are just so interesting. They took the kids and they gave them all the same problem sets, and all the kids across the board, whether or not they were getting intelligence praise or effort praise, or they were in the control group were performing more or less the same way. They were getting some of these questions right, some of these questions wrong. Then they gave them praise after they completed those problems. They either got intelligence praise, you’re so smart, you’re so talented or they got effort praise, you tried so hard, you really persisted, that’s fantastic. Then later they gave them another set of problems and they looked at performance. Now remember, the first time around all the kids got some of the questions right and some of the questions wrong, so there’s room for improvement for everybody. What they found was striking. The kids that were in the control group, so they didn’t get any specific form of praise, they performed more or less the same way as they did before. So if they were getting 75% of the answers right the first time, they got 75% of the answers right the second time. 25% wrong in both cases. The kids that were in the intelligence praise group. you are so smart, you’re so talented, the praise group, their performance went down significantly. Whereas the kids that were in the effort praise group, their performance increased significantly, okay? So this is a bi-directional effect where giving intelligence praise reduces performance, and giving effort praise improves performance, which is striking and tells you everything you need to know, which is if you’re a parent, you’re a teacher, and, of course, as we all give ourselves feedback, rewarding yourself for effort is the best way to improve performance. Rewarding yourself based on identity labels, so smart, so talented, you’re a great athlete, etc., all that stare in the mirror and do self-affirmation stuff can actually undermine performance, and in fact, it does undermine performance. It may not do it right away, but eventually it does.

--

--