Member-only story
Democracy’s Braking System
Examining the Role of the Judiciary in American Government
When a court restrains executive action that has been found in violation of the law, this does not represent an assault on democratic principles, but rather their fulfillment — the embodiment of Constitutional checks and balances in action.
This fundamental mechanism of governance warrants renewed attention in our current climate, where the boundaries between branches face unprecedented strain and the Trump administration attempts to frame judicial oversight as illegal obstruction rather than what it is: an essential component of our democratic system.
Constitutional Fundamentals: Separation of Powers
The architects of American democracy deliberately constructed a system where power is distributed rather than concentrated. As James Madison eloquently explained in Federalist No. 51, “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands… may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” This insight remains as relevant today as when first penned in 1788.
The judiciary’s authority to invalidate actions of coordinate branches wasn’t explicitly detailed in the Constitution but emerged organically through early jurisprudence…
