Enlightenment and Romanticism:
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐.
In Europe, at the end of the Enlightenment era, strange young men emerged. They looked quite exotic. These people rejected such obvious values of that time: as material well-being, slow-paced and prosperous life, prosaic calculation, and common sense. Instead, they saw a completely different world beyond the prose of reality โ a phantom, joyful, immeasurable, and spiritual world. Many people refused to live by the dictates of their fathers. They questioned and even mocked their traditions and laws. Few at that time suspected that Europe was on the verge of a new cultural era โ Romanticism โ P.S. Gurevich
Romanticism emerged in Germany in the 1790s. Its ideological foundation was the crisis of the rationalism of the Enlightenment. However, Romanticism is not a deviation from the ideals of the Enlightenment but a certain result of their development. Nevertheless, Romanticism appears to be a complete ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ to the previous era. Indeed, if we imagine the basic tenets of both eras in a table, it will look like this:
A lot can already be said about the difference between these eras, but it is necessary to discuss first some principles of Romanticism in which there is a ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ :
- The cult of the ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐, faceless is closely intertwined with the accentuating of individuality from the general (the cult of the uniqueness of the individual).
- The increased reflectiveness of creativity does not align with the discovery of the world of the ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ (that being intuitive) ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ข (artistic intuition).
- Individual ๐๐๐๐๐๐ and dissolution in the national, general, tribalโฆ
So, the main feature of Romanticism as a movement is ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ผ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป. It proposes a new system of values โ the cult of creators, the predominance of the irrational โ intuition precedes reason, the unfolding of an individualโs personality, adherence to nature.
The myth is revived โ it was seen as a way to resolve the contradiction between rich inner and unjust social external (reality). Accordingly, the myth was the ideal of romantic creativity, encouraging a greater appeal to folklore. The image was favoured over the concept, dynamism โ over stasis.
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ด๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐โ๐ ๐ป๐๐๐๐๐
In this debate with Enlightenment, Romanticism reinterprets ๐ฝ๐ต๐ถ๐น๐ผ๐๐ผ๐ฝ๐ต๐ in favour of artistic intuition, transforming it into intellectual magic where genius creates wholes from phenomena. During the Romantic era, philosophy itself is seen as a creative process that has the ability to reproduce.
The contradictions within Romanticism find resolution through the union of opposites in the dialectical concept of German transcendentalism. Romanticism rejects the axioms of Enlightenment ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ฎ๐น๐ถ๐๐ โ it opens up the world of the unconscious. The integrity of the human โselfโ, so obvious in the Enlightenment era, comes into question.
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
What interests us most is defining the specific way of life of a person, the peculiarities of this life. For Enlightenment ideology, it was evident to contrast human beings with nature, so they began using the term โ๐ฐ๐๐น๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒโ, opposing it to the concept of โ๐ป๐ฎ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒโ.
Continuing the ideas of antiquity, through the term culture, the Enlightenment spoke about the sphere of โhumanity,โ โhuman nature.โ Culture was interpreted as the improvement of the spiritual life and ๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐น๐ถ๐๐ of people. The development of culture was seen as equivalent to the development of education and prosperity.
Kant will help us greatly to see this contrast between the natural and the cultural in his philosophy, where he divided the world into the natural and the free.
In nature itself, a person is not free, but the development of culture liberates them. Here, we find an idea taken by the romantics and placed at the core of their conception of the essence of culture โ the idea of ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐๐ (the power of art).
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ต๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ฒ๐๐ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ป๐ถ๐ณ๐ฒ๐๐๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฐ๐๐น๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ ๐ถ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ฒ๐๐๐ต๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ถ๐๐บ.
In the Enlightenment era, culture is considered a moral imperative, akin to Kantโs categorical imperative. According to Herder, who, as some probably know, rejected the rationalism of the Enlightenment,
thought, society, and language are equivalent to culture.
Herder understood culture broadly, highlighting language, science, craftsmanship, art, family, state, and religion as its most important components. The interaction of these elements is the source of cultural development.
Rousseau, whom Russell called the founder of Romanticism, considered culture as
a factor that separates humans from nature.
In Rousseauโs concept, humans are anti-cultural, and he intuits that culture is created for suppression and enslavement.
๐ณ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐
We see that the understanding of the concept of culture mostly differs in its favour for humanity. In Romanticism, where humans are considered natural beings, culture is perceived as a ๐ป๐ฒ๐ด๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ phenomenon that distances people from nature. In the Enlightenment era, culture was understood only as the ๐ฝ๐ผ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ development of humanity, as humans were considered to have transcended nature and were no longer part of it.
Therefore, in the Enlightenment era, culture was perceived as a positive phenomenon, signifying human development. In the Romantic era, it acquired a negative connotation as it separated humans from nature, and according to the ideals of the Romantics, humans should belong to nature.