Navigating Moral Dilemmas in National Security

A Critical Analysis of Michael Skerker’s “An Ethics of Interrogation”

Reza Sasanian (Mirza)
ILLUMINATION
4 min readSep 4, 2024

--

Photo by Khashayar Kouchpeydeh on Unsplash

Michael Skerker’s “An Ethics of Interrogation” presents a thorough examination of the moral and ethical issues surrounding interrogation practices, particularly in the context of national security. Published in 2010, the book explores the intersection of ethics, law, and policy, offering a nuanced perspective on how democratic societies should approach the use of coercive interrogation techniques. Skerker’s analysis is especially pertinent in a post-9/11 world, where the balance between ensuring security and upholding human rights is a subject of intense debate.

Skerker begins by situating his discussion within the broader historical and political context of interrogation practices. He traces the evolution of interrogation techniques from their roots in ancient times to their modern manifestations, particularly focusing on their use during periods of war and conflict. By exploring historical precedents, Skerker highlights how interrogation has always been a contentious issue, with societies grappling with the tension between the need for information and the moral costs of obtaining it.

Central to Skerker’s argument is the development of an ethical framework that can guide interrogation practices in a way that is consistent with democratic values. He argues that any ethical approach to interrogation must be grounded in respect for human dignity and the rights of individuals, even those suspected of serious crimes or terrorism. Skerker critiques both utilitarian and deontological approaches to interrogation, ultimately advocating for a nuanced position that considers the rights of the individual as well as the potential consequences of failing to obtain critical information.

In addition to ethical concerns, Skerker delves into the legal dimensions of interrogation. He examines international human rights law, particularly the United Nations Convention Against Torture, and how these laws are applied (or sometimes ignored) by states during times of crisis. Skerker argues that legal frameworks must be strengthened and clarified to prevent abuses, particularly in situations where the boundaries between interrogation and torture become blurred.

One of the most controversial aspects of interrogation is the use of torture. Skerker provides a critical analysis of the moral and practical implications of torture, arguing that it is both ethically indefensible and often counterproductive. He cites evidence that torture rarely yields reliable information and can have long-term detrimental effects on both individuals and societies. Skerker’s rejection of torture is firm, but he acknowledges the challenges in defining and enforcing clear prohibitions against it, especially in the face of perceived existential threats.

Skerker emphasizes that democratic societies face unique challenges when it comes to interrogation. Unlike authoritarian regimes, democracies are bound by principles of transparency, accountability, and the rule of law. Skerker argues that these principles must not be sacrificed in the name of security. He calls for greater oversight of interrogation practices, including independent reviews and the establishment of clear guidelines that align with democratic values.

The book also explores what Skerker terms the “intelligence dilemma,” where the need for actionable intelligence must be balanced against ethical considerations. He discusses the pressures faced by intelligence agencies to produce results, often leading to a willingness to engage in morally dubious practices. Skerker warns that the erosion of ethical standards in interrogation can have far-reaching consequences, including the loss of public trust and the degradation of the moral authority of democratic states.

Skerker argues that the protection of human rights should not be seen as antithetical to national security but rather as integral to it. He suggests that ethical interrogation practices can enhance national security by fostering cooperation, both domestically and internationally. Skerker advocates for a human-rights-centered approach to national security, where respect for individual rights is seen as a strength rather than a weakness.

To illustrate his points, Skerker includes several case studies of interrogation practices, both successful and unsuccessful. These examples provide concrete evidence of the complex moral and practical challenges involved in interrogation. Skerker uses these case studies to demonstrate how ethical interrogation can be both effective and aligned with democratic principles. He also highlights instances where unethical practices have led to significant failures, reinforcing his argument for the need for ethical guidelines.

An often overlooked aspect of the debate on interrogation is the impact on the interrogators themselves. Skerker discusses the psychological and moral toll that coercive interrogation techniques can take on those who carry them out. He argues that forcing individuals to engage in unethical practices can lead to long-term psychological harm, including post-traumatic stress and moral injury. Skerker calls for better support and training for interrogators, emphasizing the importance of ethical conduct for their well-being as well as for the integrity of the intelligence-gathering process.

Toward the end of the book, Skerker offers a set of policy recommendations aimed at reforming interrogation practices. He calls for the establishment of clear legal and ethical guidelines, enhanced oversight mechanisms, and better training for interrogators. Skerker also advocates for greater transparency and accountability in interrogation practices, including the publication of interrogation guidelines and the involvement of independent observers.

“An Ethics of Interrogation” is a compelling and thought-provoking work that challenges readers to think critically about the moral implications of interrogation practices in a democratic society. Skerker’s analysis is both rigorous and humane, offering a balanced perspective that recognizes the complexities of the issues involved. His call for ethical interrogation practices is timely and important, urging democratic societies to uphold their values even in the face of threats. Through this book, Skerker contributes significantly to the ongoing debate on how best to reconcile the demands of security with the imperatives of justice and human rights.

--

--