Proving the Existence of God and Killing Atheism pt5
The limits of science point to God
Abraham Kaplan reveals the necessity of the scientific presuppositions in his book the conduct of inquiry in it he writes nowhere in science do we start from scratch there is only one place which we can start that is from where we are science is no miraculous creation out of nothing no spontaneous generation of knowledge from ignorance when presuppositions are — denied a logical status we remain mired in skepticism.
Example of a proposition about the natural world that scientists accept as valid but which is not discoverable by the operation of science. The presupposition we will discuss is a variant of the belief in the regularity of nature called the species as an individual structure of nature. “Andreas Gerardus Maria van Melsen” nicely explains the meaning of this presupposition in his book the philosophy of nature where he writes science presupposes that different individual material things and events can be — classified according to certain species.
What he means is that for science to operate, it must assume that: the individual things in the natural world can be grouped together into what he calls species based on their common characteristics so for example, all the different pieces of wood in nature make up the species of wood while all the individual droplets of water make up the species of water, and furthermore science must then assume that individuals of the same species exhibit the same behavior under a given set of circumstances so, for example,
Scientists assume that all pieces of wood can burn and that all droplets of water can freeze. Now, it should be — recognized that this presupposition tells us something about the world, namely that individuals of the same species exhibit the same behavior,
however, the truth of such a proposition,
or the source of this knowledge does not and cannot come from the use of the scientific method it is because before the scientific method can even be — started, this proposition must of necessity be accepted as valid or as van Melsen says:
For science does not have any choice about whether or not to accept the presupposition of the species — individual structure, it must accept it. Because otherwise, any classification induction and gathering of experience in certain laws would be entirely impossible, for there would be an infinite series of experiences without any possibility of connecting one experience with another.
Thus, by trusting such a proposition, scientists are implicitly accepting a truth above the structure of the world which is not — obtained by the operation of science some may attempt to counter the claim that the presuppositions of science are based on faith or some form of pre-scientific experience by positing instead that they are proved true by the success of science however success and truth are not equal terms in the success of science in no way prove the truth of its presuppositions.
An example will help to clarify why this is the case by Tycho Brahe, a 16th-century astronomer who developed the model of the solar system in which the Sun and Moon orbited the Earth,
while the planets Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn orbited the Sun, this model was extremely successful at predicting the observed motions of the planets,
however, it obviously would not have been correct for one to use the success of this model to make the further claim that it was a valid — depiction of the solar system, for as we now know, the Sun does not orbit the Earth.
We will briefly examine whether the claim of scientism is self-refuting proponents of scientism claim that knowledge of the world can only be — discovered through the operation of science,
however, this very claim asserts a truth about the world, namely that it is — structured in such a way that only science can provide us with knowledge of it, but this truth was not — obtained by the scientific method, so how can one maintain the truth of the claim without at the same time contradicting or refuting themselves,
so to conclude, while science is an indispensable tool in our pursuit of knowledge concerning the natural world, the claim made by the proponents of scientism seems untenable.
How science can point to God
The 18th-century philosopher Leibniz asked why is there something rather than nothing?
Science has described how our universe began with stunning success. But three centuries later, science is still — unable to answer Leibniz’s question!
The scientific understanding of the Big Bang tells us a lot,
it tells us about the dynamics and the contents and the evolution of the universe as it was at early times and as it’s evolving into now, but science that our detailed scientific understanding of the Big Bang doesn’t actually address the question of meaning,
that is not science,
doesn’t mean it’s untrue, but it is different from science,
and that is we’re bringing in other truths about the reality of human existence — comes in.
You know we can describe the age of the universe,
we can — describe how stars and galaxies have evolved over time, we can — describe — all these things, but we can’t answer why is there a universe at all and why is there a universe that would evolve toward the point of having human beings that are having the kind of conversation we’re having right now, and why there’re concepts of hatred and love, and why do people do things to each other that don’t promulgate natural selection or survival of species that make no sense.
You know why a lot of things just aren’t answered through science, and I think both theists and atheists are grateful for that because there are a lot of interesting things about life that don’t have to do with measuring the physical forces of nature,
these scientists believers then say: science must acknowledge its limits, but they also say faith must be consistent with what we know through science rather than being based on what we don’t know, for them a God of the universe could hardly be — threatened by any advances in human knowledge that’s why I think it’s exciting as a theist to go exploring because we’re never going to find anything that’s outside of God’s realm,
everything is part of this majestic creation, and the more you discover, the more amazed you get by thinking about God,
and I think exploration is a divine theist activity, and people should be excited about it.
Someone comes to you and says: I will believe you if you can bring me scientific evidence that God exists, then I believe you,
if this is scientifically proven, then it is — fine.
He’s not saying this because he expects scientific evidence from you! he will deal with the matter, confirm it and then accept everything.
That’s not the idea behind it at all,
he says this because he knows that you can’t find scientific evidence anyway, and he thinks if I tell him that, I can easily refuse. It has absolutely no other purpose, and in fact, no one believes only in scientifically proven things.
What is science?
Science studies this universe, atoms, molecules, and how they work together. That is all science can do.
You cannot scientifically prove right and wrong there is no way to prove it, there is no scientific evidence for it,
this is not possible with any methodology, but everyone knows that it exists.
Now you can go to any human being and say: “prove me scientifically that right and wrong exists”, and if he can’t, you can say without scientific proof you don’t believe that, and based on that, you say there is no right and wrong.
“Good” and “Bad” are terms we all know.
If you help an old lady cross the street, that’s a good thing. If I trip her, and she’s falling down, then that would be a bad thing.
Can you scientifically prove that the first thing is good and the second is bad? No, but we all know that.
If he were honest, he would say: “why it makes no difference” because you cannot scientifically prove that one is good and the other is bad.
Nobody believes only in scientifically proven things,
he’s doing this only for one reason, he wants to reject the message you gave him, and now he’s thinking: how can I present this, how can I find an excuse for myself,
that’s his only purpose.
Or if someone says: prove to me that the Quran is the absolute truth,
you know, when the conversation starts like this, I say: “Have a nice day, and thank you for the conversation”.
Some atheists say that the universe comes from nothing, yet what do they mean by nothing? by nothing they mean the void of empty — space or the ideal lowest-energy state possible for spacetime or actually nothing.
Both definitions of nothing are wrong because empty — space is inside space, and that’s not the definition of nothing. You can google “What is the empty — space in space called?” you will find something called a vacuum that is not nothing. Unfortunately, we call that something. But for the suck of arguments, let’s see if that accidentally works:
"According to modern cosmological theory, based on Einstein's General Relativity (our modern theory of gravity), the big bang did not occur somewhere in space; it occupied the whole of space. Indeed, it created space. Space is itself infinitely elastic; it is not expanding into anything."https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/according-to-the-big-bang-1999-10-21/The Big Bang theory says that the universe came into being from a single, unimaginably hot, and dense point (aka, a singularity) more than 13 billion years ago. It didn't occur in an already existing space. Rather, it initiated the expansion—and cooling—of space itself.https://thesciencebehindit.org/how-did-the-universe-begin-how-will-it-end/
As you can see, even space didn’t exist before, and it was created after the Big Bang, so saying universe come from nothing, and by nothing you mean void of empty — space or the ideal lowest-energy state possible for spacetime which both need space/gravity to generate a Big Bang and this prove the contradiction of their claims based on scientific facts mentioned above.
The question is! Was gravity a thing before the Big Bang? A simple answer: “No, nothing had existed before Big Bang”. The universe describing and including (gravity, space, time, matter) and everything else was — created after the Big Bang.
What about the fine-tuning of the universe, which is true, yet atheists and physicists and non-physicists skip it and don’t really consider it to be a fact, like Richard Dawkins which he doesn’t know much about theoretical physicist yet he chooses to ignore it, watch the video of his explanation of the fine-tuning.
He wanted to replace the fine tunning with the multiverse, yet he doesn’t know a thing about it, but Steven Weinberg theoretical physicist and Nobel laureate in physics school Richard about the multiverse and he said: “will never know why the laws of nature are what they’re and not other laws” also said: “I don’t see any way out of that and the fact that the constants of nature are suitable for life, which is clearly true”.
Why a Fine-Tuned Universe? — Steven Weinberg
Do you know what they say to avoid the fact of the fine-tuning? Multiverse.
Steven Weinberg said: “No one has constructed a theory that’s true it’s not only speculation, the theory would be speculative, but we don’t have a theory in which that speculation is — mathematically realized, but it’s a possibility.”
Steven Weinberg is an atheist, died last year and firmly committed to science and expressed his view on religion and God fearlessly and his famous quote: “Science does not make it impossible to believe in God, it just makes it possible not to believe in God.”
Part four (science facts)
Friedrich Gödel was a logician, mathematician, and philosopher. Considered along with Aristotle and Gottlob Frege to be one of the most significant logicians in history, Gödel had an immense effect on scientific and philosophical thinking in the 20th century.
Gödel and his ways of proofing the existence of God,
and the equation of God.
1) incompleteness theorem
What Godel did shocked the mathematical community,
It implies that there are true statements that could never be — proved.
Is the existence of God an axiom? Yes, it is. Each process is a solving process. God is — taken as an axiom by us and the universe, which cannot be — proved in the system.
P1: The theorem states that no consistent system of axioms whose theorems can be — listed by an effective procedure is capable of proving all truths about the arithmetic of natural numbers.
P2: Gödel’s incompleteness theorem shows that such a system would be incomplete. It would exist true statements outside of that system.
C: God exists — would be that true statement that exists outside the universe.
About the conclusion, to back it up even more,
because of the mercy of God, everything points to him,
life from nonlife, objective morals, testimony, tests, purpose, and fine-tuning,
which is a fact.
Quran (41:53) We will show them Our signs in the universe and within themselves until it becomes clear to them that this is the truth. Is it not enough that your Lord is a Witness over all things?
Even if I grant you the multiverse, which doesn’t have a mathematical formula and also even if it does in the future, the multiverse has to start somewhere, Alexander Vilenkin, an atheist and a strong believer in the multiverse, said: “With the proof now in place, cosmologists can no longer hide behind the possibility of a past-eternal universe. There is no escape: they have to face the problem of a cosmic beginning.”
2) Gödel’s ontological proof
The short version:
P1: God exists in the understanding.
P2: If God exists in the understanding, we could imagine Him to be greater by existing in reality.
C: Therefore, he must exist.
Here is a line-by-line explanation of his proof (the long and complex version):
Computer Scientists ‘Prove’ God Exists:
In 1989, Russian scientists descended in Siberia through a hole in the ground to a depth of 14.4 km. And they said that they heard the sound of screaming underground, and later on the spread of sayings that this sound was coming from Hell.
The hole was so deep that the researchers swore that you can hear the screams of souls tortured in Hell. The sound was clear where they said we heard thousands of souls screaming, perhaps millions of suffering souls screaming.
Ibn Mandah came out from the hadith of Abu Yahya al-Qatat on the authority of Mujahid who, said: I said to Ibn Abbas: Where is Paradise? He said: Above seven heavens. I said: Where is the fire? He said: Under seven sailed applied [seven seas on top of it].
If you want to know more about hellfire according to holy books, read this article:
Everything You Need To Know About Hellfire
Here are some authentic sources about the 14.4 km hole by the Russian scientists:
Leonhard Euler was a famous mathematician, physicist, astronomer, geographer, logician, and engineer who founded many studies.
Didorth is a philosopher whose ideas are all against religion. He used every opportunity to criticize religion. When he learned that Euler the mathematician had proven the existence of God, he wanted to meet him, and Diderot accepted the invitation of queen Catherine of Russia, and then he met the scientist in front of a large crowd of people, who [Euler] convinced him of the existence of God beyond doubt. His the quotation:
Euler advanced toward Diderot and said gravely, and in a tone of perfect conviction: “Sir, (a + bn) / n = x hence God exists; reply! ” Diderot had no reply, and the court broke into laughter. Diderot immediately returned to France.
You may have suspected that the statement was nonsense, but if the biggest atheist, the legend at the time, believed and had no replay whatsoever.
Some will say Diderot didn’t know Math that’s why he couldn’t answer and run away when people were laughing at him, but the fact Diderot know Math better than most, in fact, he wrote “Memoires sur differents sujets de mathematique (1748)”, some of Diderot’s scientific works were — applauded by contemporary publications of his time.
Euler was a believer in God, a Christian man, considered to be a genius when it comes to Math, and for him, mathematics gave insight into God’s good creation, people like him see different interpretations of Math which many won’t see until after centuries, that’s why people like him make revelations, and we’re not certain what Euler seen in his equation that he claims it proves God.
Euler published in Berlin in the year 1747 against the objections of atheists as a stand of defense through his work of mathematics.
Also amazing articles to read:
Lastly, the argument from mathematical beauty: “eiπ + 1 = 0, therefore God exists.”
We find the fundamental constants (e, i, pi, 1, 0) containing each of the fundamental operations combined in a theorem that united trigonometry, analysis, algebra, and geometry.
Keith Devlin said, and I quote: “like a Shakespearean sonnet that captures the very essence of love, or a painting that brings out the beauty of the human form that is far more than just skin deep, Euler’s equation reaches down into the very depths of existence.”
Also, great article by Tyler Journeaux where he defines two more arguments that point to God (The Argument from Mathematical Truth, The Argument from the Applicability of Mathematics), in this article:
The gay city
The city of immorality and vice, in which about 20 thousand people lived, and their fate was like the people of Lot, and today nothing remains of the city except its ancient ruins. And more than 1150 bodies were discovered by archaeologists since excavations of the city began.
As you can see in the picture ‘The Two Maidens’, archaeologists thought they were male and female cuddling each other until they examined the bodies found them to be men clutching at the last moment.
God’s wrath on them, so the volcano erupted in a huge, and devastating eruption in the year 79 AD and destroyed the cities of Pompeii and Herculaneum. The volcano buried the city in ash for 1,600 years until it was — discovered in the 18th century. The fossilized remains of the inhabitants are still — traced back to their work, and tourists go to visit the city.
God forbid homosexuality in both Quran and the Bible. And doing that in public like the people of the city did is a huge red flag.
Quran [26:160–175]:  The people of Lot rejected the messengers  when their brother Lot said to them, “Will you not fear ˹Allah˺?  I am truly a trustworthy messenger to you.  So fear Allah, and obey me.  I do not ask you for any reward for this ˹message˺. My reward is only from the Lord of all worlds.  Why do you ˹men˺ lust after fellow men,  leaving the wives that your Lord has created for you? In fact, you are a transgressing people.”  They threatened, “If you do not desist, O Lot, you will surely be — expelled.”  Lot responded, “I am truly one of those who despise your ˹shameful˺ practice.  My Lord! Save me and my family from ˹the consequences of˺ what they do.”  So We saved him and all of his family,  except an old woman, who was one of the doomed.  Then We utterly destroyed the rest,  pouring upon them a rain ˹of brimstone˺. How evil was the rain of those who had been — warned!  Surely in this is a sign. Yet most of them would not believe.  And your Lord is certainly the Almighty, Most Merciful.
Also, the Quran highlights different details in two more places, [Quran 11:77–83], and also [Quran 7:80–84]
Also, you can read the story from the Bible, [Jude 7], [Genesis 19:1–11] and [Judges 19:16–24] it’s similar to the Quran story, Muslims believe that God (Allah) sent Jesus and all other messengers, they believe some of the words of the Bible is the word of God but don’t know which, that’s why the Quran correct the wrong assumptions about what really happened in details, if you don’t believe me, here some links from famous Christian (Frank Turek) admitting that it was — changed, here is the link, also more proves (link1, link2, link3, link4, link5, etc.), this doesn’t mean Christianity false, it only means things were — changed through time and that what Muslims believe, yet some of the words are actually the word of God.
What does the Bible say about homosexuality?
And don’t forget Sodom and Gomorrah and their neighboring towns, which were — filled with immorality and every kind of sexual perversion. Those cities were destroyed by fire and serve as a warning of the eternal fire of God’s judgment. (NLT)
“Do not practice homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman. It is a detestable sin.” (NLT)
“If a man practices homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman, both men have committed a detestable act. They must both be put to death, for they are guilty of a capital offense.” (NLT)
1 Timothy 1:8–10
Now we know that the law is good, if one uses it lawfully, understanding this, that the law is not laid down for the just but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who strike their fathers and mothers, for murderers, the sexually immoral, men who
practice homosexuality, enslavers, liars, perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine (ESV)
In the recent effort, researchers conducted extensive tests on the victims’ bones and teeth this led to a discovery that flipped their previous assumption on its head. The analyses revealed the men were about 18 and 20 years of age, though the latter may have been older
- After they have been — found, all assumed the two embracing figures are male and female.
- But, CAT scan and DNA analysis, including bones and teeth, shows they’re men.
- The couple was not related, and investigators say it’s possible that they were lovers.
The city was — wiped out when the devastating natural disaster struck in 79 AD.
Spirits lower than the angels, capable of appearing in human and animal forms and influencing people for either good or evil.
Satan has known, for many names, The devil, the Deceiver, Lucifer, Iblis, Demon, etc. He is not an angel because angels were — made from light, jinns were — made from fire, humans were — made from clay.
Not all the jinns are bad, and in fact, some of them are really good beings, all spirits known as jinns except those who become evil, those we call demons.
Quran confirm it and also says that they have a life like we do and do the evidence for that is people get touched by demons, and we have true stories of that (The Entity, The Conjuring, The Exorcism of Emily Rose, and many other true story movies), even tho, they are true and happened, there is no scientific explanation for this cases and when science can’t prove it,
it only proves the word of God in the Holy Quran.
Here are a few resources to check
Police captain confirms children ‘possessed by demons’
Dr. Richard Gallagher, Demonic Possession Expert, Isn’t Trying to Convince You
Scientists have found proof of God in the code of DNA, but what did they find in the DNA code that made them believe in the existence of God?
The article to get the answer as you know that a computer program is a series of binary numbers that are once and zeros (1, 0), this sequence of ones and zeros (1, 0) instructs the computer watch to do in the same way all the functions that are taking place inside the cell of the body are — controlled by an incredibly complex and extremely long code written in the DNA which is — placed inside the nucleus of all the cells of our body,
but now the question arises how this complex code of DNA convinced scientists of the presence of God?
Let’s try to understand it with the help of a simple example, suppose you are walking on a beach, and suddenly you see a message written on the beach sand, the message says: “John is my best friend”, then what is the possibility that this message was — just written by chance by the random waves? You will say no, it’s not possible how these waves — of the ocean can write this message.
This message is information that must have come from the intelligence. So we can’t neglect an intelligent mind behind such a simple meaningful message carrying information, so the point is information comes from intelligence, and according to Dr. Francis Sellers Collins director of the human genome project said: “one can think of DNA as an instructional script is software program sitting in the nucleus of the cell”.
Now, if we see the complexity of the code written in the DNA, it will boggle your mind the letters of the programming language written in the DNA are A, T, G, and C, just like the letters of computer programming language ones and zeroes (1, 0) as what the computer will do! It is — decided by the program placed inside it some memory that may be hundreds to thousands of letters long, and in the same way, whole functions of the body are — decided by the DNA code having its copy placed inside each cell of the body.
This DNA code is nearly three billion letters long,
and its instructions are written by different sequences and arrangements of the four letters A, T, G, and C, a unique combination of these letters instructs the cell how to carry out extremely complex body functions these four letters of DNA code A, T, G, C are actually names of four chemicals these are Adenine (A), Thymine (T), Guanine (G) and Cytosine © that respectively stand for A, T, G and C. Letters as 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 is an example of a computer program instruction in the binary language with letters ones and zeroes (1, 0) similarly A G A G T G G C T C A C T C C T G A A is an example of instruction in the DNA code written by using four letters A, T, G and C. Example of the binary language:
Now, remember the example of the message written on the beach if such a simple message written on the beach cannot be — written by chance or randomly by C waves and needs an intelligent mind conveying a piece of information, how is it possible to neglect an infinitely intelligent, superintelligence who has written that incredibly long dense and complex code of three billion letters inside the nucleus of each cell, who placed that code there? Is it just by chance! Do you know how complex the DNA code is?
The DNA code contains all the information that makes up an organism,
all the features that make you, every quality and trait that you possess,
every chemical reaction — taking place inside your body, and a lot more.
This code is — transferred to the next generations, which is the reason why a child has many characteristics similar to their parents it’s interesting to note that a child shares 99.5% of the DNA with their parents, and everything that is happening inside the cell is — instructed by the DNA code written in the language of four letters A, T, G, and C not only this,
this code has instructions also for auto repairing itself,
this three billion-letter code is copied to new cells before a cell dies,
so the information is not lost after the death of the cell,
these all unbelievably complex functions are performed by the DNA code, at extremely high speed, without you even noticing.
This three billion-letter code is so long that if a person types one word per second for eight hours a day continuously, it — would take him 50 years to type the human genome that is the DNA code.
And this code is not just about its length, the code has to instruct the cell to complete highly complex tasks, so it’s obvious — that the job to write this program is beyond the limits of a human mind.
No program has ever been — written by chance or got information from nothingness if you are a computer programmer, then you can understand how much intelligence, concentration, creativity, pain, and time it takes to write a simple code of just a few hundred words if we want to get a task done by instructing a machine can that computer program be written without an intelligent programmer by itself by chance no, so how can we think that this incredibly long code of three billion letters that is unbelievably complex and the densest storage of information in the universe can be — written without any superintelligence behind it? Who is that programmer?
That must be no one other than God itself, and according to many scientists, God has shown its presence in the DNA code by showing his infinite intelligence for many researchers. It is the proof of God, placed inside every cell of our body. Here is a famous quote that describes your uniqueness:
Your DNA is like a blueprint of your soul, which is another sacred thing that is not like anyone else’s in the world.
So, brothers and sisters, I hope you liked this article about DNA, and if you found this article interesting then please like and share it with your friends, more such articles don’t forget to subscribe to my page.
There are other scientific facts that I cut from the article because of the article length. It is long but ready, and I will share it in the next few days.
I will keep posting other parts from a different perspective every week/month, so be sure to check it out ✌️.
Some (like 25% or less) people are atheists because they follow famous atheists, yet the funny thing will mention some people who atheists think they’re atheists:
Albert Einstein rejected the Bible as the word of God and said: “that the creator was unknowable”, and said: “God being personal was child-like”.
He also said: “In view of such harmony in the cosmos, which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me for the support of such views.” and he categorically said: “I am not an atheist”.
Charles Darwin “In my most extreme fluctuations, I have never been an atheist in the sense of denying the existence of a God”, and he believed that “God was the ultimate lawgiver”.
Carl Sagan said: “I am not an atheist. An atheist is someone who has compelling evidence that there is no Judeo-Christian-Islamic God. I am not that wise, but neither do I consider there to — be anything approaching adequate evidence for such a god. Why are you in such a hurry to make up your mind? Why not simply wait until there is compelling evidence?”
Abraham Lincoln said: “I know that the Lord is always on the side of the right, but it is my constant anxiety and prayer that I and this nation may be on the Lord’s side.”
Mark Twain hated religions but he said: “None of us can be as great as God, but any of us can be as good.”
Benjamin Franklin said: “I have lived a long time, Sir, a long time, and the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth — that God governs in the affairs of men.”
You will find Thomas Edison listed in celebrity atheists, on positive atheism and other atheists websites, but he wasn’t an atheist, and he said: “There is a great directing head of people and things — a Supreme Being who looks after the destinies of the world.”
Thomas Jefferson said: “say nothing of my religion; it is known to my god and myself alone.”
Scientists struggle to know why some variables are constant in this universe, like PI, speed of light, etc. But in fact, they will never know the answer because science can’t answer the origin of things. We use science to understand why things work the way they’re and nothing more.
Science must accept as true certain principles about the structure of nature before undertaking any scientific investigation. And these principles or the presuppositions of science are themselves not discovered utilizing the methods of science furthermore by asserting that only science can provide us with knowledge of the world scientism puts forth a claim that is itself not derived from the operation of science,
and therefore puts forth a self-refuting claim.
Knowing the limitations of science and gravity can’t work without space, and space didn’t exist before the Big Bang leaves us with one question who cause the Big Bang?
Nobody believes only in scientifically proven things.
What if I told you science and religion can work together perfectly (don’t know much about the accuracy of the Bible). However, the Quran doesn’t have a single error nor contradictions and not a single scientifically fact proven wrong (and please, if you’re going to mention some errors in the Quran kindly do your homework cause Muslims all over the world did answer each false assumption about them (type what you think the error on YouTube, and you will be — convinced that you got it wrong, or from some hater who got it out of context)). The Quran was revealed 1400 years ago and has never been — changed, and the book made some proven statements that science only now has discovered. Here are some authentic sources about the Quran and modern science:
I would suggest you read the Quran with an open mind, and if you can’t afford to buy one, here is a link (also, you can style the website the way you like and add as many translators as you want, but it will be messy, just one translator is enough either (Dr. Mustafa Khattab, or Saheeh International) they’re the best, really close to the actual Arabic Quran).
God bless you and keep you safe and healthy, “amen.” 🙏
Feel free to ask me any questions ✌️.
Also, you may like: