Summary of Philosophy of Science
This is a revolution of consciousness. Goodbye Materialism.
The relationship between knowledge and wisdom is still a subject of debate in the philosophy of science. The aim of wisdom is to attain precise and measurable knowledge. This is modern science. Repeatable, measurable, precise. But is this knowledge based on the appearance or the essence of something? Scientists try to achieve this knowledge by using scientific methods to understand nature and society. However, the concept of wisdom brings a different perspective to knowledge. Sages do not look like scholars, they look more like pedants. Many of them do not even have academic careers.
This may seem like a paradox, but wisdom is considered a higher concept compared to knowledge. Who are the scholars in the modern world, a sociologist. A chemist. A physicist. A psychologist. A biologist. A psychiatrist. And it’s usually the left brain. Forgive me for generalisations for now. So who are the wise ones, a Dervish. An Arif. A scholar. A Psychic. A Prophet. And in fact Carl Gustav Jung, in the Red Book, even rationalised metaphysics. Esotericism is important. Newton and Nikola tesla spent their lives in occult sciences, alchemy and maji. Kabbalah and Theosophy are also important, as is Gnosticism. Paganism too. I hope you experience spiritualism without too much ego destruction.
Wisdom is more orientated towards the knowledge of the self than the knowledge that knowledge tries to acquire. However, this can cause the wise to be seen as pedantic by the wise. His knowledge is complete. The sage does not even leave theory to the scholar. In fact, it is both theoretical and practical. One can be a sage without being a scholar. For example, Mevlana, Ibnul Arabi and Yunus Emre.
To be a scholar, some intelligence, some talent and effort are required. However, this may not be enough for wisdom. The mind comes into play here. What we have mentioned in previous lessons, that is, this is his spiritual field. The level of development of their metaphysical body. An aware scholar can also develop them. There is no such thing that he will always remain a scholar. But people’s lives are governed by their beliefs. Because the scholars despise the Sages, their awareness remains at the level of the scholar. While the knowledge in the hands of the scholar is accepted as proven knowledge, the knowledge in the hands of the scholar aims to persuade. Even proven scientific knowledge, that is, knowledge produced by knowledge, can be falsified. Positive scientists call this the principle of falsifiability in science. Didn’t the double slit experiment and the Copenhagen interpretation really shake us in the philosophy of quantum physics? Doesn’t anyone see the paradox of expert ignorance in today’s world? Excuse me…
The days when parapsychology will be scientificised are near, this is an open call to those who do not want to be left behind artificial intelligence. The subconscious constructs physical consciousness. Aristotle did it based on metaphysics. Metaphysics is based on mystical experience. There is experience. It is the concretisation of abstract things in everyday life. We are now in the period when modern sciences are approaching their peaks, but HERMETIC knowledge is more important. It is time to look at theology from a different perspective. The secrets of ancient Egypt are important.
At present, even astrologers are not interested in esoteric-occult astrology. They are also classified as scholars, as well as a positive scientist interested in astronomy. They are not dealing with the wisdom behind it. The Sufis have a different picture of heaven and hell. Sufism is not shirk. Religions have a secret history, even medicine has a secret history and philosophy. Man has five bodies. Etheric body, astral body, mental body etc.. Even the astral body and the mental body are divided into two. Plato was right. The book of dialogues is actually esoteric.
It’s a strange kind of evolution. In fact, there is a serious difference in world view between reading many kinds of books and reading the right books too much. Here is the distinction between wisdom and knowledge. The universal, deductive method is important. It is important to be able to make intellectual abstractions. One could not start philosophy without studying logic. Metaphysics is even more universal than physics and sociology. Knowledge is important. The synthesis of science, religion, philosophy and history is METAPHYSICS!
With the development of artificial intelligence, the modern world must now turn to METAPHYSICS, i.e. wisdom education. There are serious worldview differences between modern science and wisdom. This means knowledge-science. Science is the opposite of wisdom. Science is knowledge. It is not wisdom. The wise person lives metaphysics in his daily life, he is an arif. Even the arif takes the knowledge of wisdom. Yunus emre says that when he says that knowledge is to know knowledge, he says that knowledge is to know wisdom. otherwise he would have written it shorter as knowledge is to know wisdom. pay attention, he says that knowledge is to know wisdom. This also leads to Irfan. Knowing oneself, knowing oneself, is related to the ESOTERIC aspect of knowing oneself. (Esotericism) Otherwise, one reads books for years in vain, that is, in vain… The valuable summary of science and philosophy is wisdom. It is wisdom. It is not knowledge. It is wisdom.
The knowledge of Socrates and Aristotle is different from the sophists, that is, they were actually sages. They were initiates. Even Paracelsus was an initiate. Pedantry is the lowest level of knowledge. Who wants to be a millionaire competition is aimed at pedants. The invention of the printing press and the spread of the internet brought pedantry and scholarship to the fore. To give examples of today’s scholars, namely sophists, names such as Celal Şengör, Caner Taslaman, Ahmet Arslan and İlber Ortaylı. Dücane cündüoğlu is a true intellectual and a true sage. So is Mahmud erol kılıç. The public also needs scholars and sophists, so that knowledge can reach people at lower levels. The number of sages is very small, but they will always have the most valuable knowledge.
