The Subscribed Life: Renting Our Way to the Future

Christopher M. Gage
ILLUMINATION
Published in
8 min readJun 20, 2024
Subscription Lifestyle: Balancing Convenience & Ownership — Photo by OpenAi -Dall-E

From Cassettes to Clicks: A Journey Through Ownership

Growing up, I remember the thrill of buying something physical. Whether it was buying my first cassette, bill and ted’s excellent adventure soundtrack, or saving up for that must-have computer game, there was a sense of pride in owning physical items.

My first cassette — A&M Records release © 1989 UMG Recordings, Inc

Fast forward to today, and the landscape has dramatically shifted. Ownership is increasingly becoming a relic of the past, replaced by the omnipresent subscription model. From music and movies to software and even groceries, it seems like everything now comes with a monthly fee. As This shift is not just altering how we consume, but fundamentally changing our relationship with the things we use daily.

My first computer game — Photo Credit Magic Mushrooms, Acornsoft© 1985

Subscribe to get my stories directly by email.

The Subscription Takeover: Convenience at a Cost

The contrast with today’s subscription-centric world is striking. In those days, owning a physical item — be it a cassette, a computer game, or a book — meant something. It was yours to keep, to lend to friends, or to pass down. Instead, we find ourselves subscribing to access rather than purchasing to own, which hands power to others. Services like Spotify and Netflix have revolutionized the way we consume media, offering vast libraries at our fingertips for a monthly fee.

But it doesn’t stop there. Software, once bought in physical boxes, is now largely accessed through subscriptions like Adobe or Microsoft 365. Even groceries can be delivered regularly via subscription services. This shift towards subscription models promises convenience and flexibility, allowing us to access a wide range of services without the burden of ownership. Yet, this convenience comes with a trade-off. We no longer own the products; we merely rent them for as long as we can pay. This transition is not just changing consumer habits but also reshaping our understanding of ownership and value in the modern world.

Workplace Perks or Pitfalls? The Office Subscription Model

The subscription model has permeated not only our personal lives but really first started in the workplace. Businesses increasingly rely on subscription services to equip their employees with the tools they need. Take, for example, the provision of company phones, cars, and computers. Instead of outright purchasing these assets, companies opt for subscription-based services, which often include regular upgrades and maintenance. This approach offers flexibility and ensures that employees always have access to the latest technology without the company bearing the high upfront costs of ownership.

It allows companies to be more agile, adapting quickly to technological advancements without being tied down by outdated equipment. However, this reliance on subscriptions also means that if the company faces financial difficulties, these essential tools could quickly disappear, impacting productivity and job satisfaction.

Subscription Struggles: When Life Pulls the Plug

The shift to subscription models raised to the surface in my personal life recently. I remember the day I got an out of the blue request from HR for a “confidential meeting”. Anyone could have read the play and I was made redundant from my job due to a down turn in the market, with a “thank you for your service”. Suddenly, the stability I had vanished. Along with losing my income, I also lost access to several essential tools that had been provided through my workplace “subscriptions”. The company car, was the first to go. Without it, and two young children, faced immediate challenges in getting around, making the already daunting task of family life and getting to interviews harder.

The absence of a computer was another significant hurdle. My work laptop, was reclaimed by the company and locked immediately.

My mobile phone, also returned. My number which I had for years and known by now was a limitation for potential recruiters looking to contact me for opportunities.

The realization was that, with a small redundancy package, I might need to immediately purchase a Car, Phone and Computer! So the cushion the redundancy provided was consumed.

Being financially focused in this moment forced me to reevaluate my personal subscriptions as well. Services like Spotify, Netflix, and various software applications that had become integral to my daily routine were suddenly luxuries I had to pause. Each cancellation felt like another step back.

This experience opened my eyes to the broader issues and vulnerabilities inherent in a subscription-based lifestyle for society as a whole. When financial stability is shaken, the dependencies on these services become starkly apparent and, after years of paying for them, have nothing to show for it.

The World Economic Forum’s Bold Prediction: Happiness Without Ownership?

A key topic to consider where the world is headed is the World Economic Forum (WEF) and its bold statements about the future of ownership, suggesting that by 2030, “you will own nothing and be happy.” This provocative idea encapsulates the shift towards a sharing and subscription-based economy. According to the WEF, this future promises increased access to goods and services, potentially reducing waste and fostering sustainability. The concept is that instead of owning products, individuals would subscribe to or share items, ensuring that resources are used more efficiently and equitably.

While this vision might seem idealistic, it raises important questions about control and autonomy. The notion of owning nothing implies a significant dependence on service providers, which could lead to issues around, power, control and privacy. This perspective from the WEF invites a deeper conversation about the balance between convenience and the potential risks associated with relinquishing ownership.

Techno-Feudalism: When Corporations Play King

The term “techno-feudalism” has emerged to describe a potential future where a few large tech companies wield significant control over essential services and resources, much like feudal lords did in the past. In a techno-feudal society, individuals might not own the means of production or the products they use daily. Instead, they would rely on subscriptions and services provided by powerful corporations.

This model extends the World Economic Forum’s vision of a subscription-based future to a more dystopian scenario. The concentration of power in a few tech giants could lead to a lack of competition, reducing consumer choices and increasing prices. The constant need to subscribe to essential services can create a precarious existence, where access to basic necessities is contingent on one’s ability to pay continuously.

In such a scenario, the control these corporations have over data and personal information becomes even more significant. Privacy concerns and the potential for exploitation are heightened. The shift from ownership to access can strip individuals of their independence, making them reliant on corporate entities for their everyday needs. As we move towards this subscription-dominated world, it’s crucial to critically assess the implications of techno-feudalism and advocate for regulations that protect consumer rights and ensure fair competition.

Subscribing to the Future: What Lies Ahead?

As we look to the future, the expansion of subscription models into various sectors of life presents both opportunities and challenges. Car subscriptions, for instance, offer a flexible alternative to ownership. I can see by 2035 a car will be similar to your mobile/cell phone contract, signing up to a 2 year service for a car autonomously picking you up and dropping you off where you need to go. Road tolls are also adopting subscription models, making it easier for commuters to manage their “expenses”. This model may be convenient, but is quickly removed when circumstances change.

Entertainment has already embraced this shift, with streaming services like Netflix, Spotify, and Apple Music dominating the market. Food delivery services such as HelloFresh and Dinnerly offer subscription plans that deliver meals directly to consumers’ doors, catering to busy lifestyles and the growing demand for convenience.

Renting (a form of subscription) is, sadly, another growing trend across the world. Traditional homeownership is becoming less accessible, due to big venture capital firms now buying up swathes of family homes, leading many to view renting as the only solution.

Healthcare is not immune to this trend either. Subscription-based health services provide ongoing care for a monthly fee, offering benefits such as telemedicine and continuous health monitoring.

The Subscription Snare: Risks We Can’t Ignore

The pervasive shift towards subscription models brings several societal risks that warrant careful consideration. As we become increasingly dependent on subscription services for essential goods and services, we risk losing the autonomy that comes with ownership. This dependency can leave individuals vulnerable, especially during financial hardships losing access to critical resources.

The consolidation of power among a few large corporations raises concerns about market monopolies and the lack of competition. This scenario could lead to higher costs and fewer alternatives for consumers, making it difficult for them to switch providers if they are dissatisfied. Australia is, a great case study, where most brands and consumer retail outlets are owned by two companies Wesfarmers or Coles Myer Group. This market dominations has significantly contributed to the cost of living crisis as they make record profits.

Balancing Act: Owning Your Future in a Subscription World

As we navigate the increasing prevalence of subscription models in our lives, it’s crucial to remain vigilant about the potential risks and implications. While these models offer undeniable convenience and flexibility, they also pose significant challenges that need to be addressed and be conscious of before we collectively sleep walk into negative outcomes. We must advocate for regulations that protect consumer rights, ensure fair competition, and safeguard personal data. Reflecting on the balance between ownership and access, it is vital to consider the long-term impacts on our autonomy and financial stability.

Let us engage in thoughtful discussions and take proactive steps to ensure a future where subscription models enhance, rather than diminish, our quality of life.

Enjoying my articles?

1. Like and comment — I try to reply to everyone.

2. Follow Me

3. Subscribe to get my stories directly by email.

--

--

Christopher M. Gage
ILLUMINATION

Ex Deloitte Strategy & A.I Director l Fractional CxO & Advisor | Melbourne Australia | Politics, Defense, Economics I Strategy I A.I I Technology