Sitemap
ILLUMINATION

We curate & disseminate outstanding stories from diverse domains to create synergy. Inquiries: https://digitalmehmet.com/ Subscribe to our content marketing strategy: https://drmehmetyildiz.substack.com/

Member-only story

Well $#!+: A Bleeping History of Symbol Swearing in Books

3 min readFeb 5, 2025

--

If you thought this was going to be a profanity-filled post, you are correct, but I won’t actually spell out any words that might offend someone.

First, some background.

I am a nonfiction book editor, so naturally the subject of swearing in books comes up when I am working with, say, a military memoir. Seriously, who doesn’t think sailors have a lock on profanity? Try Marines. Army too. Booyah!

Or books about, well, anything if the author is reconstructing dialogue among normal people. It’s a fact of life: People swear. If you want to write authentic dialogue, in some situations, you need to include the swear words or risk sounding a little too prissy.

Here’s a New Word for You

Some authors don’t want to offend readers by using actual swearing. They want to be sensitive to sensitive ears and situations such as some religious readers. And along came grawlix.

Back at the turn of the century, the turn before the last turn, so 1900s, according to some iffy online sources, comic strip artists started using symbols to represent obscene language in thought or speech bubbles for their characters. Remember Dagwood getting mad at Blondie? It wasn’t until the 1970s when the term grawlix was used to explain the usage.

--

--

ILLUMINATION
ILLUMINATION

Published in ILLUMINATION

We curate & disseminate outstanding stories from diverse domains to create synergy. Inquiries: https://digitalmehmet.com/ Subscribe to our content marketing strategy: https://drmehmetyildiz.substack.com/

Sandra Wendel
Sandra Wendel

Written by Sandra Wendel

A picky nonfiction editor who helps authors write, polish, and publish their books. Author: Cover to Cover: What First-Time Authors Need to Know about Editing.

Responses (1)