Zero-Knowledge Proofs: the Art of Silent Data Sharing

Mamadou K. KEITA
ILLUMINATION
Published in
2 min readOct 14, 2023

--

Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on Unsplash

The realm of cryptography brings with it the allure of keeping secrets while paradoxically allowing for the verification of information. One of the techniques that fascinated me in this field is Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs). In this article, we’ll deep dive into the technical foundations of ZKPs and explore their significance.

What is a Zero-Knowledge Proof?

In formal terms, a Zero-Knowledge Proof is a cryptographic method allowing a prover to convince a verifier that a statement is true without revealing any specific information about the statement, except for its truth.

Mathematically, a ZKP must satisfy three properties:

  1. Completeness: If the statement is true, an honest prover can convince an honest verifier.
  2. Soundness: If the statement is false, a cheating prover cannot convince an honest verifier.
  3. Zero-Knowledgeness: The verifier learns nothing other than the validity of the statement.

Technical Foundations

Let’s illustrate ZKPs with the Quadratic Residues problem, a classic example.

Interactive Protocol:

Real-world Applications

  1. Blockchain: ZCash, a cryptocurrency, employs zk-SNARKs (a form of ZKPs) to validate transactions without revealing transaction amounts or parties.
  2. Authentication: Securely proving one knows a password without revealing it.

Challenges and Outlook

While ZKPs offer powerful privacy features, they come with computational overhead, especially in constructing non-interactive ZKPs like zk-SNARKs.

However, with the rise of quantum computing and ongoing research in cryptography, more efficient and scalable ZKP mechanisms are on the horizon.

Conclusion

Zero-Knowledge Proofs embody the spirit of cryptography: ensuring privacy and authenticity simultaneously. As technology landscapes evolve, expect ZKPs to play an increasingly pivotal role in secure communications, transactions and Machine Learning works.

References:

  1. Goldwasser, S., Micali, S., & Rackoff, N. (1985). The knowledge complexity of interactive proof systems. SIAM Journal on computing, 18(1), 186–208.
  2. Oded Goldreich, “Foundations of Cryptography: Volume 1, Basic Tools,” Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  3. Ben-Sasson, E., Chiesa, A., Genkin, D., Tromer, E., & Virza, M. (2014). zk-SNARKs for scalable blockchains. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive, 2014, 344.
  4. Camenisch, J., & Stadler, M. (1997). Proof systems for general statements about discrete logarithms. Technical Report/Dept. of Computer Science, ETH Zurich.
  5. Ben-Sasson, E., Chiesa, A., Tromer, E., & Virza, M. (2013). Scalable zero knowledge via cycles of elliptic curves. In Annual Cryptology Conference (pp. 276–294). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

--

--

Mamadou K. KEITA
ILLUMINATION

Machine Learning Engineer & Researcher, Entrepreneur, Impact driven. "Technology and Innovation to serve People"