Frank Armitage Was Here

Michael G Bennett
Apr 8, 2016 · 2 min read

Or; on the Failed Nihilistic Potential of “They Live

Image for post
Image for post

John Carpenter’s 1988 film They Live is a credit to Left junk culture, a masterpiece of B movie science fiction. The surface story concerns John Nada, a homeless, unemployed drifter who lands in Los Angeles, falls in with a church-centered commune of other homeless people, and discovers that this community shelters a “terrorist group” committed to exposing an alien conspiracy to enslave humans to the ends of planetary exploitation and profit maximization for themselves and their sell-out human collaborators. Although Nada is nothing in a Reaganomically interpolated America, his bleak condition does nothing to weaken his embrace of the American Dream.

But the movie is richer when we take “Nada” to mean “nothing” in a political philosophical sense, that is, as a mark of nihilism. Then John Nada becomes a champion of Nothing, and a critic of the very movie in which his character resides. Its narrative posits that perceptions of reality are the effects of a sociotechnical system, and that to see the Real, one needs to use an anti-technology technology, the Hoffman Lens. The better narrative turn, the more nihilistic move, would’ve been to describe those shades as another source of projection, another synthetic reality device, another Platonic Cave.

On this reading, not only would the American Dream have been revealed as an inhumane tool designed to cultivate a vigorous, irrational, and self-destructive work ethic in those who have zero chance of realizing its promise, but the alternatives — exposure to the reality of Nothing, or submission to another political flavor of synthetic reality — would have admirably complicated They Live’s message. As my friend, the Detroit artist Saint XYZ told me recently, “the movie works well as a response to Reagan, but it’s even more amazing in the way it walks right up to edge of ultra-radical politics and pauses.”

Considering the movement’s flirtations with soft Nietzscheanism, it’s surprising that Afrofuturists haven’t yet zeroed in on the affinities of They Live. Particularly relevant is the character portrayed by the actor Keith David. The reciprocal interracial solidarity his character performs with Nada and others, his pugilistically surreal resistance to learning the terrorists’ lesson — “freedom hurts” — these attributes are less interesting than his name: “Frank Armitage.” It’s also the name of the person credited with writing the script. So, in (name) effect, the central Black character of the movie is foregrounded and raised to the level of creator. How’s that for Anti-Reaganism?

Imaginary Papers

Make, share, dream a better future.

Michael G Bennett

Written by

Technoculture critic &lover; @ASU Research Prof; former NEU Law Prof; Young People's Project booster; @The_SNET

Imaginary Papers

Make, share, dream a better future. From the Center for Science and the Imagination at Arizona State University.

Michael G Bennett

Written by

Technoculture critic &lover; @ASU Research Prof; former NEU Law Prof; Young People's Project booster; @The_SNET

Imaginary Papers

Make, share, dream a better future. From the Center for Science and the Imagination at Arizona State University.

Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight. Watch

Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox. Explore

Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just $5/month. Upgrade

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store