Julia Tutwiler Prison for Women located in Wetumpka, Alabama (Wikipedia)

Is Alabama about to lock itself into mass incarceration for the next 50 years?

The latest private prison industry scheme is the oldest trick in the book: guaranteed profit.

Donald Cohen
Sep 19 · 3 min read

You’ve probably heard of the “lockup quotas” buried in some private prison contracts. They essentially penalize the government for empty prison cells, which helps jack up America’s world-leading incarceration rate, even as crime rates continue to fall.

Well, there’s a new private prison industry trend that’s just as alarming.

Alabama’s Department of Corrections is considering signing so-called “public-private partnerships” to build three new mega-prisons. Rather than using traditional bond financing — or reforming laws to send less people to prison — the state would borrow nearly $1 billion from private investors. In return, those investors would charge the government expensive lease payments to use the prisons for the next 50 years.

Alabama isn’t alone. In 2017, Kansas hired CoreCivic to design, finance, build, and maintain a new prison in Lansing, despite the state’s own auditors saying using bonds would be cheaper. (Governor Laura Kelly, elected after the deal was signed, says the state was “hoodwinked.”)

That’s right, the two biggest players in prison public-private partnerships are CoreCivic and GEO Group, the massive, publicly traded private prison corporations helping the Trump administration violently crackdown on asylum-seeking and immigration. They’re in the real estate business now, and they want to make it easier for governments to build more cages to lock people up in.

As you might expect, embedding the profit motive in running a prison is concerning. Alabama likely won’t be able to repurpose the buildings, even if its incarcerated population significantly declines. To justify the expensive lease payments, state lawmakers might feel pressure to keep the prisons full — for the next 50 years.

In other words, not only are public-private partnerships (for prisons, highways, water systems, etc.) more expensive, less transparent, and less democratic than traditional procurement methods, but they also introduce incentives that run counter to the public interest.

Another example: some public-private partnership contracts used to build public schools prohibit the community from using the buildings for childcare, sports leagues, and other after-hours uses.

Alabama already has the fifth highest incarceration rate in the nation. And just this April, the U.S. Department of Justice alleged the violent conditions in the state’s prisons violate the Constitution.

It shouldn’t take last ditch, pro bono legal representation to free the many Alabama prisoners who shouldn’t be locked up, as Carla Crowder of the Alabama Appleseed Center for Law and Justice recently wrote about in the New York Times.

Building mega-prisons instead of incarcerating less people will only make things worse, especially using public-private partnerships.


Get a free ebook

Dismantling Democracy tells the story of the 40-year conservative attack on government and sketches a pro-public strategy for fighting back. Download it here.

In the Public Interest

In the Public Interest is a nonprofit that advocates for democratic control of public goods and services.

Donald Cohen

Written by

Exec Director of In the Public Interest, a non profit promoting the democratic control of public assets and services. inthepublicinterest.org

In the Public Interest

In the Public Interest is a nonprofit that advocates for democratic control of public goods and services.

Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight. Watch
Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox. Explore
Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just $5/month. Upgrade