Here Is Why Modern Architecture Doesn’t Suck

Let us begin with some definitions:

• Traditional/classical architectural style is characterized by intricate carvings, is ornate, and exudes royalness. By “classical architecture”, note that I am not referring to the actual Classical architecture; rather, I am referring to the architectural style that predated modern architecture.
• Modern architectural style is one that is characterized by the philosophies of “less is more”, “form follows function” and minimalism.

The popular consensus is that modern architecture is plain and boring while traditional architecture is truly beautiful and magnificent. This YouTube comment concisely captures the criticism against modern architecture:

I too expressed the same sentiment in my previous post:

Though I am a fan of modern architecture, I have realized that skyscrapers are lifeless compared to something like St Paul’s Cathedral. When you stand in front of the Cathedral, you feel tiny. It has character, elegance, and royal magnificence which makes you want to kneel and surrender….You don’t feel shit when you stand in front of the Shard. It is basically a big slab of glass.

Do you see anyone standing and admiring the Shard? Nope. But you do see that with the Cathedral. Hence, proved.

The National Civic Art Society conducted a survey where 72% of the people said they prefer classical architecture over modern.