Neoliberals Can’t Get Over Jill Stein

Washington Post’s smear article against Jill Stein, trying to caricature her as some a “fairy tale” candidate.

Jill Stein was the Green Party’s candidate for the 2016 Presidential Elections. I’m going to be honest about this: I was a Jill Stein supporter. I supported her even before Bernie Sanders won the Democratic Nomination. Why? Because if Bernie would have won the Democratic Nomination he would obviously beat Donald Trump, so instead of picking up the “lesser evil” like many Democrats did this election which was Clinton v.s. Trump, I would choose “the greater good” which was Jill Stein; she was anti-war, unlike Bernie. She constantly said she was against U.S. Imperialism, something Sanders never mentioned. Jill also said she supported Whistleblowers and sites like WikiLeaks which contribute to Government’s transparency. She had a better taxation plan, wanted to eliminate student debt and she wanted a Green New Deal which would have boosted the economy of the U.S. with an ecology-oriented platform.

As you can see in the picture, The Green New Deal sought to create jobs and eliminate Climate Change (fun fact: as you can see in the picture, not all Jill Stein supporters were “White” like the media constantly says)

Even with all of what I’ve said, the Clintonite crowd and Mainstream Media said she was a terrible candidate, saying her candidacy was a joke, that her plans looked like if they came from a fairy tale, that voting for her helps sexism (what?)

Now Clintonistas are going as far as to say she has ties with Russia and with President Vladimir Putin, but she answered to all these claims like a real badass:

And of course, all Clintonites had to troll her as always:

These weren’t the only tweets that the Clintonite crowd did against Jill Stein. To all of this claims I decided to tweet this two studies:

Which apparently ignited the hatred of the Clintonistas and they started to tweet hateful tweets against me. These are some of my comebacks:

And my favorite:

As you can see, all the Clintonistas were going crazy because of two studies I pointed out. They claim that Trump supporters are anti-fact and anti-science when they aren’t really that different from them.

They claim Greens, Berners, Leftists, Socialists, etc. Can’t get over Hillary Clinton’s role in the rise of Donald Trump, when they keep trolling Jill Stein on Twitter with smears and claiming it was her fault that Trump won the 2016 election.

I can’t get through my head the fact that this bunch of Neoliberals who claim to be Leftists, feminists, anti-war, pro-LGBT, pro-ecology, anti-corruption, pro-working class, etc. Can go and support a candidate like Hillary Clinton, who has supported regime change wars, sold weapons to Saudi Arabia (a country which oppresses LGBTQ+ people, women, is a theocratic regime and is bombing Yemen right now) through the State Department when she was Secretary of State because of pay-to-play corruption within the Clinton Foundation, she supported fracking and pressed countries to accept that practice even though it harms the environment, she supports the Trans Pacific Partnership which is a corporatist trade deals which hurts working-class people, she also admitted she had a role in the 2009 right-wing military coup in Honduras and she messed up Haiti with the Clinton Foundation and the State Department. And I just mentioned some of the stuff she has done.

How is it they attack Jill Stein, who is more aligned with the beliefs they so dearly claim to have, and not Gary Johnson even though he won way more votes than Stein? How? That’s my question.

If a Neoliberal says Jill Stein is bad and Gary Johnson is okay, be sure they are a hack, they’re not being objective, and they rather a corporatist libertarian like Gary Johnson instead of an anti-war, pro-PoC and pro-working class person like Jill Stein.

Thanks for reading. If you enjoyed reading this article please follow me on Twitter and read my writings on my Medium account.