Image for post
Image for post

Agile radio, continuous improvement ready

Originally published at tommyferraz.com on August 8, 2018. You can find it in Spanish here.

Tommy Ferraz
Aug 8, 2018 · 5 min read

As co-founder of Voizzup, a startup that helps radio stations evaluate on-air contents daily by measuring listeners spontaneous reactions on mobile apps, I’ll be working with the VRT, one of the most innovative public radio organisations in Europe in the coming months. Also, hopefully very soon, we’ll be helping some of the stations of a very active and inspiring commercial radio group.

These two organisations have already learned by themselves that they need to adapt for catching up with the latest technological advances and disruptions in audio industry. They have tweaked their internal structure to embed startup-like teams, set up innovation labs and add roles new to Radio such as solution architects, scrum masters, data automation product managers and voice user-experience designers.

Last week during a workshop with one of these organisations we talked about In this scenario of constant change, gigantic organisations face the challenge of being capable to adapt fast. They need to turn from heavy, slow elephants into fast and agile mice. My presentation was based on the premise of two requirements for agility: using an iterative approach to creation and being user-centric at all phases. I’ll explain:

Iteration

By working in short cycles, we invest less time and efforts, we risk less. If what we are working on fails, we have learned fast without jeopardising much. If it works, we can progress and improve.

Users in the center

Users, listeners in our case, are changing behaviours faster than ever. What worked for them yesterday, might not work today. We need to ask ourselves continuously whether we are delivering our users something they care for.

Image for post
Image for post

Many of those positions and roles mentioned above — usual in software companies, new to Radio — were present among the attendees of last week session. Maybe some of them (not most, I guess) discovered during the session that these two ingredients of agility were not exclusive to their team and discipline. Software developers and engineers use , probably an framework called . They release as much bug-free code as possible in each bi-weekly or monthly cycle, or . Product managers use . They prioritise efficiently, pointing not at what can be built, but what should be built. Through tests and experiments, they find as quickly as possible the minimum product that delivers value to the customer, they build (). Designers use . They conduct research, exploration activities and design exercises for testing in a speedy way their hypotheses about the fit between the problem of the user and the solution.

, and three disciplines for helping teams become agile. Well, not exactly. Agility is about responsiveness, flexibility, adaptation. Like Jeff Gothelf explains in his book, these methodologies or frameworks have something in common, they all enable continuous improvement (which ultimately motivates organisations to implement them). But they have different approaches and goals: improves velocity. pursues efficiency. verifies problem-solution fit. Like Gothelf says in his book and multiple articles, actual agility is only reachable for those organisations that use and combine the core activities for continuous improvement which are common to all these three disciplines in order to remain focused and aligned.

Where are the radio guys, the professionals of content? Don’t on-air hosts, show producers, news editors, music programmers, audience research managers, programme directors, need to be part of this agility? Members from both organisations I referred to above, have expressed the same concern: “” (traditional radio teams, closer to content) don’t seem to be interested in seeking agility. Don’t they need to become more responsive to everyday-faster-changing listening behaviours?

I believe they do. I believe WE do. There’s nothing inherent to our profession, vocation or expertise that protects us from the uncertainty of change. We also need to continuously challenge our assumptions and validate that what we are producing and broadcasting, podcasting or streaming has value for our audience. We need to confirm everyday that listeners still care for the content we make.

, or sound alien to us. Why shouldn’t we pursue continuous improvement though? Like Gothelf, I believe the entire (radio) organisation, as one cross-functional team, needs to combine activities for continuous improvement. On-air, programming, editorial, sound production, audience research teams are not exempt. In my opinion, they also need to embrace creation in short cycles and listener feedback at all stages in order to allow continuous improvement. Even if that requires that they come up with their own framework and terminology.

It can be done. Voizzup, together with the editors of , the morning show of BNR Nieuwsradio (our client in Amsterdam, recently awarded as the most innovative company in The Netherlands) has developed a methodology for continuous improvement of on-air contents. Data collected from listeners’ reactions during their listening on mobile apps are processed and correlated with on-air contents, minute by minute. Those insights are delivered to the show team daily, for continuous content evaluation. Over time, the editors find . Those are not treated as conclusions but as that are tested through . At BNR, editors who iterate through and developers who code in shape teams and work on projects together.

Whether you are an engineer, a developer or a designer working in radio, please do your organisation a favour and share this article with your colleagues working in content. Also recommending them some readings from here could be useful. Most importantly, invite them to participate in your cross-functional team activities, share your knowledge and advocate transparency within your organisation.

If you are a programme director, morning show director, host or producer and you are interested in continuous improvement techniques, you can start today. For initiating you don’t need more tools than paper, pencils and post-its. In this article you’ll find a set of explorative exercises, similar to some activities, that constitute the base of my proposal for self-evaluation and continuous on-air (or off-air) talent development. Give it a try and let me know if you need help. Have fun!

Innovation in Radio

It's not in the technology, it's in the experimental…

Tommy Ferraz

Written by

Founder of Voizzup and formerly radio Programme Director. Introducing continuous improvement in radio, both for on-air content and talent. www.tommyferraz.com

Innovation in Radio

It's not in the technology, it's in the experimental mindset

Tommy Ferraz

Written by

Founder of Voizzup and formerly radio Programme Director. Introducing continuous improvement in radio, both for on-air content and talent. www.tommyferraz.com

Innovation in Radio

It's not in the technology, it's in the experimental mindset

Medium is an open platform where 170 million readers come to find insightful and dynamic thinking. Here, expert and undiscovered voices alike dive into the heart of any topic and bring new ideas to the surface. Learn more

Follow the writers, publications, and topics that matter to you, and you’ll see them on your homepage and in your inbox. Explore

If you have a story to tell, knowledge to share, or a perspective to offer — welcome home. It’s easy and free to post your thinking on any topic. Write on Medium

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store