Utilitarianism: Consequentialist Moral Philosophy

It was in the 1780s that the two most-discussed moral theories were developed. One was the deontological morality of Kant and the other was the consequentialist morality of Jeremy Bentham. Deontological means adherence to a set of universally true moral laws, and Kant appealed to our duty to obey rational moral laws that he saw as imperatives on us. Consequentialist means a moral system that assesses the consequences of actions as to their moral correctness, and this, Bentham claimed, was the only legitimate moral system.

--

--

--

Philosophy is a way of life and the unphilosophical life in not worth living.

Recommended from Medium

Not All Science is Created Equal

Is ‘Real’, real?

Are intentions or outcomes more important when judging whether actions are moral?

KANTIANISM AND NAZISM

A 90 Year-Old Cure for Unhappiness

Did Hitler Know He Was a Bad/Evil Person?

Where I fail at living in reality

Philosopher File: Anaximander

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Douglas Giles, PhD

Douglas Giles, PhD

Philosophy professor reaching beyond the ivory tower and digging deeper. elmhurst.academia.edu/DouglasGiles, @DGilesPhd, InsertPhilosophyHere.com.

More from Medium

Feminist Philosophy: A Primer

Vervaeke’s Glib Solution to the Meaning Crisis

Dual Aspect Monism: The Pauli-Jung Story, Part 2

“God is Dead” — What Nietzsche Really Meant