Was There Another Cover-Up In Response to the Whistle-Blower?

A New Op-Ed in the New York Times by ICAP’s Neal Katyal & Joshua Geltzer

Office of Public Affairs (CC BY 2.0)

In a New York Times op-ed, ICAP’s Neal Katyal and Joshua Geltzer detail another aspect of the Trump Administration’s cover-up. After the whistleblower complaint, the Department of Justice violated a requirement that it refer even “probable” election-law violations to the Federal Election Commission:

Allegations of one cover-up, then another, emerged last week. Officials in the Trump administration tried to “lock down” the phone call memo between President Trump and Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine (the first cover-up), and then officials in the executive branch made efforts to keep this information from reaching Congress (the second cover-up).

Now we have discovered what may be a third cover-up. In its handling of the investigation and a potential campaign-finance violation, the Department of Justice appears to have ignored a rule that a matter under investigation must be referred to the Federal Election Commission. Critically, if the department had followed the rule, the Ukraine affair would have been disclosed to the American public.

Were it not for the efforts of the whistle-blower, everything about this would have been hidden from the F.E.C. and the American people.

Read the full piece here.

--

--