đ° John Deere & Hacked Firmware, Hacked Dishwashers, EV variability, Flat CO2 Emissions â IOP Observatory #19
Hi,
glad you could make it.
In this weekâs issue: John Deere and the DMCA, hacked dishwashers, EV variability, Flat CO2-emissions
Itâs a bit of a frenzied week, this one, but bear with me, weâre going to get to the bottom of it.
Iâm going to be in San Francisco in late April (23â27th), and have some spare time on my hands. Naturally Iâd love to catch up with folks doing interesting work in IoT/Connected Mobility/Energy. If thatâs you, or you know of someone whom I should meet, give me a shout!
IoT
So where do we start? With the John Deere story? Farmers, Firmware hacked in the Ukraine, the smell of monopoly power â itâs got all the necessary ingredients for righteous indignation, doesnât it?At the heart of the story is, of course, software. After the EFF successfully lobbied the Librarian of Congress for a temporary exemption of section 1201 of the DMCA, which in essence lifts the criminal penalty on breaking DRM/encryption of the software of land-based vehicles, John Deere started requiring customers to sign a license agreement, which prohibits tinkering with the software. Now, as always, thereâs a grey market in patched software, and some farmers take advantage of that. This comes at a critical time where lobbying in several states for so-called Right-to-Repair legislation is ongoing. John Deere is quiet on the topic, but itâs reasonable to assume that they didnât put those license requirements up just to spite farmers, but to protect their business model.
Which leads us to the interesting point of what ownership and licenses entail in this new era. Itâs obvious that currently, license agreements mostly serve to restrict post-sale use of goods, without necessarily putting a similar burden on sellers or manufacturers, which naturally makes people wary.
As the story of the vulnerable commercial dish washer from Miele shows, manufacturers arenât usually in a position to give support that would be somewhat equitable to the restrictions they want to put in place for the use of their goods. Remember, most software is provided on an as is basis, with no liability in place for the manufacturer. And most firms donât even know how to deal with security breaches, for instance. Often, itâs established firms who donât follow standard practices in the industry world, such as code signing, which would have easily defeated that malware, targeted at Siemens PLCs, that fronted as firmware update.
While the irresistible temptation for companies to become platforms bears out, weâll urgently have to figure out what obligations should come with this. Sales legislation as it developed over centuries looked at reconciling competing interests between seller and buyer. We do not that for licenses, and it would be better for everyone involved if we did.
Why American Farmers Are Hacking Their Tractors With Ukrainian Firmware
John Deere, Connected Products, and the Problem with Licensing
A Hackable Dishwasher Is Connecting Hospitals to the Internet of Shit
Malware âdisguised as Siemens firmware drills into 10 industrial plantsâ
Platform Companies Are Becoming More Powerful â but What Exactly Do They Want?
Energy
While the US is currently in the process of undoing 8 years of climate policy, the numbers from the International Energy Agency are actually rather encouraging. Carbon emissions remain flat for the third year running, amidst global economic growth of around 3% p.a.
That means that the long elusive goal of uncoupling economic growth from growth of greenhouse gas emissions seems to have occurred, in no small part due to the massive expansion of renewables. It should be noted, however, that the fact of CO2-emissions remaining flat shouldnât be overly celebrated. They still remain at an unprecedentedly high, and thus dangerous, level, and weâre still far off from the reductions we need to achieve to remain within 2ÂșC of warming, the goal of the Paris Agreement.
That such a reduction can only be achieved in an orchestrated manner should be obvious, given the interdependent nature of the world we live in. Germanyâs currently discovering that, for itâs energy system to support more renewables, the Energiewende needs to expand beyond its own borders. That will be expensive, and fraught with political conflict, given that energy policy is usually attributed to the individual states, not the European Union, which seems much more amenable to climate goals than some of Germanyâs neighbours.
But letâs not forget that, of course, technology will play a role here as well as policy. And so, although Iâm usually not a fan of blockchain tech as applied to energy systems, as we discussed last week with the Brooklyn Microgrid, itâs nonetheless encouraging that entrepreneurial talent is finally looking at Energy, and not just trying to build the next social platform.
Trumpâs big new executive order to tear up Obamaâs climate policies, explained
IEA finds CO2 emissions flat for third straight year even as global economy grew
Why Germany Needs a European Energiewende
Blockchain meets Energy: State of the Market
Mobility
The shift to Electric Vehicles is shifting the complexity of automotive mobility, and building a car becomes orders of magnitude easier (and cheaper.) Weâve seen a fair amount of innovation, especially on the high end, with various entries into the electric supercar market. After all, thatâs where Tesla started out and look where it got them. But what may be indeed more interesting is the variability in form and functionality that a less complex car enables. Case in point: Deutsche Post, Germanyâs postal service, unsatisfied with the commercial electric vehicles that were available in the market, went ahead, bought a startup, and built their own.
Deutsche Postsâ internal projections are that the project pays off after just 2.500 vehicles, and their on route to make 10.000 this year alone. Needless to say, the auto industry reacted rather miffed. I love these secondary order effects, because they remind you that whatâs going to happen with new technology is usually not what the glossy presentations want you to believe. Also, itâs happening much faster than anyone predicted.
Talking of second and third order effects, what will the effects of wide-spread adoption of self-piloting cars look like? Itâll certainly not be contained to individual mobility. But unanticipated effects usually come with unanticipated costs, as well. So we might as well start to ask: if the visions of the future of seamless mobility providers run by multinational corporations are to come true, whoâll pay for the infrastructure retrofitting necessary to enable this future?
Even Germanyâs Post Office Is Building an Electric Car
How can self-driving cars change our world?
21 Industries Other Than Auto Driverless Cars Could Turn Upside Down
Who Pays for Redesigning Streets for Self-Driving Cars?
The Strange, Weird, and Interesting
Try me a river: New Zealand declares a river a person
These Scientists Sent a Rocket to Mars for Less Than It Cost to Make âThe Martianâ
How Aristotle Created the Computer
End Note
The Internet of People Observatory is my weekly newsletter, documenting the network transformation as it unfolds.
You can sign up here to get it to your inbox. The Observatory comes out every Tuesday.