Programming

Android Image Loading Libraries: Glide, Picasso, Fresco, and Coil

Sandeep Kella
Intuition
Published in
4 min readApr 21, 2024

--

Let’s delve deeper into the four prominent Android image loading libraries: Glide, Picasso, Fresco, and Coil. We’ll explore their strengths, weaknesses, ideal use cases, and intricate details to help you choose the perfect tool for your project.

1. Glide:

Strengths:

  • Performance: Glide boasts excellent performance with background queuing, prioritizing downloads, and automatic resource management (foreground vs. background tasks).
  • Flexibility: It offers a rich API for various image loading scenarios, including transformations (resizing, cropping, rounding corners), applying filters, crossfading between images, and supporting GIFs and animations.
  • Ease of Use: Glide provides a clean and intuitive API, making it easy to integrate into your project.
  • Community and Support: With a large and active community, Glide benefits from continuous improvements and extensive documentation.

Weaknesses:

  • Library Size: Compared to some options, Glide has a larger library size, which might be a concern for resource-constrained projects.
  • Advanced Transformations: While Glide supports transformations, complex manipulations might require more configuration.

Ideal Use Cases:

Glide shines as a versatile choice for most image loading needs. Its speed, extensive features, and ease of use make it suitable for projects of all sizes, from simple apps to complex ones with demanding image processing requirements.

2. Picasso:

Strengths:

  • Simplicity: Picasso excels in simplicity with a very concise and straightforward API. It’s easy to integrate and use, making it ideal for developers new to image loading libraries.
  • Lightweight: Picasso boasts a small library size, minimizing its impact on your app’s footprint.
  • Maturity and Stability: As a mature library, Picasso has a long track record of stability and reliability.

Weaknesses:

  • Limited Features: Compared to Glide or Coil, Picasso has fewer features. It offers basic image loading functionalities with limited support for background queuing and advanced transformations.
  • Maintenance: While still functional, Picasso’s development activity isn’t as vigorous compared to Glide or Coil.

Ideal Use Cases:

If your project prioritizes a simple and lightweight solution for basic image loading tasks, Picasso is an excellent choice. It’s also a good fit for projects that don’t require advanced features like background queuing or complex image manipulation.

3. Fresco:

Strengths:

  • Performance and Memory Efficiency: Developed by Facebook for their memory-intensive applications, Fresco prioritizes performance and memory optimization. It utilizes a custom memory cache and bitmap recycling strategies to minimize memory usage.
  • Advanced Features: Fresco provides comprehensive support for advanced functionalities like progressive JPEGs (allowing for gradual image loading), animated GIFs, and scaling images efficiently.
  • Custom View: It offers a custom view called SimpleDraweeView specifically optimized for image rendering, providing additional control over image display behavior.

Weaknesses:

  • Complexity: Fresco has a steeper learning curve compared to other libraries due to its larger codebase and custom view. Setting up and using the API can be more involved.
  • Library Size: Similar to Glide, Fresco has a larger library size, potentially impacting applications with tight resource constraints.

Ideal Use Cases:

Fresco is the go-to library for performance-critical applications where memory management is paramount. Its advanced features like progressive JPEGs and GIFs make it ideal for scenarios where those functionalities are essential.

4. Coil:

Strengths:

  • Modern Approach: Built with Kotlin Coroutines, Coil offers a clean and asynchronous API, aligning well with modern Android development practices.
  • Lightweight and Efficient: Coil prioritizes a small library size and efficient resource usage.
  • Active Maintenance: It’s a relatively new library with active development and a focus on simplicity and core functionalities.

Weaknesses:

  • Community and Maturity: As a newer library, Coil has a smaller community compared to established options like Glide or Picasso. This might translate to less readily available support resources.
  • Learning Curve for Coroutines: If your project doesn’t utilize Kotlin Coroutines, there might be a slight learning curve in understanding Coil’s asynchronous nature.

Ideal Use Cases:

If you’re developing with Kotlin and value a modern, lightweight approach with Coroutines, Coil is a compelling option. Its focus on core functionalities makes it well-suited for straightforward image loading tasks.

Choosing the Right Library:

Here’s a refined decision-making process to select the optimal library for your project:

  1. Project Requirements: Consider the essential functionalities your project needs. Does it require basic image loading,
  2. Performance and Memory: How critical are performance and memory efficiency for your app? If you’re dealing with a large number of images or a resource-constrained device, Fresco’s memory management might be essential.
  3. Development Preferences: Do you prioritize simplicity and a small library size (Picasso, Coil), or do you value a wider range of features and a larger, more established community (Glide)?
  4. Team Expertise: Is your team familiar with Kotlin Coroutines (Coil) or do they prefer a more traditional approach (Glide, Picasso)?

Beyond the Big Four:

While these four libraries dominate the landscape, there are other options to consider:

  • Universal Image Loader (UIL): A mature library with a large following, but development activity has slowed down.
  • Volley: Primarily intended for network requests, but can be used for image loading as well.

Remember, the “best” library depends on your specific project’s needs and preferences. Experiment with a few options, consider the factors mentioned above, and choose the tool that best aligns with your development goals.

By understanding the strengths, weaknesses, and ideal use cases of each library, you’ll be well-equipped to select the perfect image loading solution for your next Android application.

--

--

Sandeep Kella
Intuition

Android dev by day, tech writer by night. Breaking down code so even my cat could understand it. Join me on Medium for fun, geeky, and practical Android tips!