Invoke Capital
Published in

Invoke Capital

The Data Economy

Dr. Mike Lynch, OBE — September 2016

I was recently asked by a very wise journalist whether I agreed with him that “data is the new oil”. It is a very good question. After all, oil powers modern life, from cars to kettles as well as the digital device you might be reading this on. Data, meanwhile, powers much of our modern lifestyle: Amazon knows what books you like, Ocado knows your preferred brand of milk, Spotify recommends music guaranteed to please. Just as countries that sit on vast oil reserves are wealthy, so too are the companies, like those listed above, that gather a lot of data. In fact, technology companies currently occupy the top three spots on the Fortune 500, and an oil company the fourth, making the case that data might in fact be more valuable than oil.

Data is undergoing incredible change. In the past, data was gathered for one task, such as a mailing list, which would require names and addresses to be entered into a database of rows and columns. The process was very formal and clean but now we have a world of unstructured data, bits of prose, images and audio that do not work in the same way. Because they are richer, we find unexpected insights among them. We are at the very beginning of a paradigm shift in the type and amount of data we can understand because the data itself is evolving. Take the Internet of Things, for example, which will be in your home before you know it: devices everywhere will generate more data.

But it isn’t only the data that morphs and grows, how we analyse it does too. With data fusion, we are starting to gather data from more independent sources, bringing them together to get answers in a way that wasn’t possible before. In an unintended way we can also find out things we couldn’t before. New algorithms around analytics can find insight among dirty, incomplete and sometimes inaccurate types of data and get us stunning results whereas in the era of the database, huge effort and great expense went into data cleansing, and might not have provided any benefits.

Furthermore, in this new era of machine learning we are seeing intelligent systems starting to have an effect on all sorts of tasks, from legal and financial services to autonomous vehicles. These systems learn from data, which is central to their intelligence, and they need a very large amount of data to learn from. This brings us into a new question of data ownership.

When asked “who owns the data?”, the knee-jerk response is “I do”, but what if that data can do some societal good? Enter the concept of informed consent, which is a nice idea in the context of elective surgery, for example, but is quite difficult to give for your data. For example, you can get cheaper insurance if you put a tracking device in your car. What happens if the tracker works out that this type of vehicle goes up in flames. Well, if we haven’t given informed consent, we can’t get the benefit of the data. So while it is a good place to start, it isn’t what we need in this new world. Perhaps, like in accounting, we need to be asking “why should you share data?” and find practical ways to make it work.

The other side of data ownership is derivative data: who owns the results? Again, many of us feel that “I do” if our own data was used. But if you are a student that uses a library, reads the books and then write a book of your own, none of the authors you read are staking a claim to your work. The same should happen with data. But it isn’t completely straightforward.

Take the NHS, which has vast troves of health data. From a research point of view, it is generally considered a good thing. But what if we let a foreign entity use this data for drug development? Well then, we need to find ways of describing this data as “strategic data” that comes with a price tag, be it selling the drug to the NHS at lower cost, or forcing the R&D to be done in the UK, etc. We must not be shy about realizing the value of our data.

The last point to consider around data is security. There will be data breaches and in fact, 80% of the FTSE 100 have an infiltration on their network. Cybersecurity keeps executives and governments awake at night, and already the modern thinking on cybersecurity is that breaches will happen and are a price paid for holding data. Likewise, anonymisation, while commendable, is going to fail and will be broken by our sophisticated data analytics.

So back to the original question, I agree that it is starting to look a lot like data and oil are similar. They are both valuable, of strategic national importance — and a security risk.

--

--

--

Invoke Capital is a very different type of technology investor. Founded by some of Europe’s most successful technology entrepreneurs it invests in, and supports, world-leading fundamental technology businesses emerging across Europe.

Recommended from Medium

Skewness and Kurtosis:-

Kenya’s April fuel shortage — A look into the data

Relevant tag prediction using deep learning…

Questions to unlock valuable insights for your analytics project

The Time To Get Started In Quantum Computing Is Now

Pandas DataFrame: Playing with CSV files

Design and Optimize Full-Factorials using SAS

Recent IOCS Update ~ New Online Group

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Invoke Capital

Invoke Capital

Invoke Capital invests in and supports world-leading fundamental technology businesses emerging across Europe

More from Medium

Data Privacy — Spotify Wrapped but the rest untapped

The 1 underrated trait that helps you grow as a data professional and a leader

AI Implementation: What Does It Take to Adopt Artificial Intelligence in Business? | Toolbox

Understanding the Employer Space in Healthcare and Quantifying Value with Tamra Lair