New World Order (in real-time)

Mars Robertson
Island DAO
Published in
4 min readAug 9, 2020

Look at the history

When you look at who got the prize, you’ll notice plenty of guys from the International Peace Bureau

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Peace_Bureau

WW1

That didn’t help and after WW1 the League of Nations was established.

the first worldwide intergovernmental organisation whose principal mission was to maintain world peace

That didn’t help… There was WW2.

WW2

The most notable ones being Tehran, Yalta, Potsdam and the Bretton Woods that established a new financial system:

After the WW2 the United Nations was established.

The UN was established after World War II with the aim of preventing future wars, succeeding the ineffective League of Nations.

🇺🇳 United Nations is not fit for purpose

But negotiators here ran into serious trouble when Saudi Arabia, the US, Russia and Kuwait objected to the conference “welcoming” the document.

Instead they wanted to support a much more lukewarm phrase, that the conference would “take note” of the report.

Salim Ismail in action: https://youtu.be/Wda5TQRQ1P4?t=632

New Unified Global Government

Updated / upgraded / enhanced / decision-making process and the ability to enforce the decisions.

Starting from the global unified emission trading system.

For example, the EU ETS trades primarily in European Union Allowances (EUAs), the Californian scheme in California Carbon Allowances, the New Zealand scheme in New Zealand Units and the Australian scheme in Australian Units
- source

If Australia and New Zealand cannot agree on the units, do you think it is possible to get unanimous consensus among ~200 United Nations member states?

Emissions budget

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emissions_budget — COVID gave us loads of hope — change is possible. Emissions down by a couple % points, what do we do about it now?
Polluters pay? Egalitarian? Or maybe grandfathering, so that those countries that are already developed, have large allowances coming from the “base year” in the past?

Removing energy subsidies

Removing agricultural (and fishing) subsidies

It has been criticised on the grounds of its cost, and its environmental and humanitarian impacts.

Removing 🚬 subsidies

Just kidding.

There are no 🚬 subsidies.

Quite the opposite, there are various taxes.

But imposing taxes usually increases the price, people can get angry: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_vests_movement

Removing subsidies for harmful stuff is more likely to be accepted by the people, by the government.

What if the petrol price increase in price and you cannot afford to go to work to buy food? Maybe the answer is to grow your own food as opposed to slaving in a bullshit job that does not generate any intrinsic value.

Recommendation

We suggest the following:

  1. Update the decision-making process and make decisions enforceable. If the United States does not agree, impose sanctions on them, just like they impose sanctions on others.
  2. Remove subsidies of any type, prices determined by the market.
  3. Egalitarian principle for global unified emission trading system

Trust the data. Trust the science.

Allow some margin of error, be on the safe side, there are some uncertainties and majority of the models do not account for:

  • feedback loops
  • tipping points
  • non-linear changes
Snippet from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqywSUFPc8s Very well executed disinformation campaign https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ExxonMobil_climate_change_controversy —uncertainties about climate science

Media support

When you look at the blog the summary of Mars’s work you’ll notice that tellthetruth.media is the most important link.

No amount of science or facts can change anything unless regular people (average voter) will understand what is going on.

Next steps

Loads of details, loads of information available on the website:

--

--

Mars Robertson
Island DAO

Creative force multiplier. Effective altruism, exponential technologies. Rational game theory incentives.