GILabs Policy Notes: Enhancing Role of Judiciary

~A research project by Governance Innovation Labs

Ginia Chatterjee
Judiciary for Democracy
5 min read5 days ago

--

OVERVIEW:

In a democracy, the judiciary plays a crucial role in upholding the rule of law and guaranteeing justice. Reforms that improve accountability, openness, and efficiency must be put into place if judicial institutions are to be strengthened. This policy note by Governance Innovation Labs provides a comprehensive note on the current issues, recommendations, and a road map to make judiciary more democratic in nature.

KEY ISSUES:

  • Case Backlog: A large number of unresolved cases compromises the efficiency of the legal system.
  • Accountability and Transparency: There is a need for more judicial accountability and openness. There is also a lack of mechanisms for feedback.
  • Technological Integration: Technology is used sparingly to handle cases and judicial procedures.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

  1. Judiciary Reforms

a. Streamlining Procedures: The backlog of cases can be greatly reduced, and procedural modifications can improve the judiciary’s efficiency.

b. Increasing Judge Appointments: Strengthening the court procedures by appointing more judges with specializations is crucial to easing the burden on the system.

c. Judicial Accountability and Transparency: There is a necessity of more accountability and openness in order to strike a balance between the public view and judicial discretion.

Best Practices:

  • The UK government has made investments in Nightingale Courts, which are makeshift courts created to boost capacity and cut down on delays.
  • In order to lessen the need for formal court proceedings, nations like Australia and Canada have been promoting alternative dispute resolution (ADR) techniques.
  • Backlog reduction in Singapore has been greatly aided by the judiciary’s use of technology for e-litigation and e-discovery.
  • Every year, the UK Judicial Appointments Commission releases reports on the behavior and performance of its judges.

2. Democracy based courts with specialized judges

Creating courts revolving around issues with democracy with specialized judges can improve the quality of justice. These courts can focus on specific areas such as electoral disputes, human rights violations, and public interest litigation. Specialized judges with expertise in these areas can provide more informed judgements.

Best Practices:

  • Several nations, such as Uganda, Croatia, and the Philippines, have set up specialist anti-corruption courts to effectively and impartially handle complicated corruption matters.

3. Fast Track Courts

Fast-track courts are useful for accelerating the legal process, especially in situations where prompt resolution is necessary. Online hearings can cut expenses, shorten wait times, and improve accessibility to the court system for those living in rural locations. This will also assist victims of abuse in avoiding having to confront their abusers and relive the agony.

Best Practices:

  • Starting in 2017, the Netherlands has undertaken a thorough digitalization of court cases. Individuals and businesses may electronically file papers and monitor the status of their cases using a platform called “My Case.”
  • The sophisticated e-justice system in Estonia, which allows for online case filing and e-court services, is well known.
  • The eLodgment system, which the Federal Court of Australia adopted, enables the electronic submission of documents in court cases.

4. Using Artificial Intelligence for promoting Democracy

Compartmentalize similar cases: Artificial Intelligence (AI) can split up similar cases into smaller groups and display automated outcomes, examine enormous volumes of data to find trends and precedents, helping judges make better rulings and increase consistency and predictability in the results of court cases.

Best Practices:

  • AI technologies such as DoNotPay (legal reasoning), BlueJLegal (case prediction), and Ross (legal research) are a few examples where AI can guarantee adherence to precedents, lessen human prejudice, and save total legal procedures expenses.
  • The goal of programs like “AI for All” is to incorporate AI into a variety of fields, including the legal field.
  • AI is now being used in India for legal research and other purposes by programs like Indian Kanoon and SUPACE.

5. Feedback system

  • Transparency and accessibility: A transparents and accessible feedback system is essential for maintaining public trust in the judiciary. Such a system should allow citizens to provide feedback on their court experiences, report issues, and suggest improvements. This feedback can be collected through online portals, mobile applications, and physical kiosks in courthouses.
  • Constant efficiency monitoring system: Evaluating the effects of changes and identifying areas for improvement can be aided by routine audits and surveys. Reports on the performance of the judiciary should be made easily available to the public

Best Practices:

  • Judicial Performance Evaluation (JPE) systems in the US offer methodical evaluations of judges’ performances. Survey responses from lawyers, litigants, court employees, and even jurors are included in these evaluations.
  • The Judges Act has been amended by the Government of Canada, which is the procedure for addressing misbehavior accusations against federally appointed judges.

ROAD MAP:

  1. Establishing Teams for Efficiency Improvement

Operations within the court may be greatly improved by creating specialized teams inside it that are focused on increasing efficiency.

The group might consist of: Specialized judges, IT specialists, feedback collectors, and employees in charge of administration

IMPLEMENTATION:

  • Carry out a comprehensive evaluation of the existing inefficiencies in the courts. Examine case backlogs, hold-ups in the legal process, and administrative obstacles.
  • Assemble interdisciplinary groups with distinct responsibilities to tackle recognized problems. Make sure there is a varied representation in the group to address every facet of the legal system.
  • Prioritize case handling by integrating AI and other technologies to automate repetitive processes, manage case workflows, and forecast case outcomes.
  • To guarantee accountability and ongoing development, set up systems for routinely tracking and reporting progress to carry out a comprehensive evaluation of the existing inefficiencies in the courts. Examine case backlogs, hold-ups in the legal process, and administrative obstacles.
  • Assemble interdisciplinary groups with distinct responsibilities to tackle recognized problems. Make sure there is a varied representation in the group to address every facet of the legal system.
  • Prioritize case handling by integrating AI and other technologies to automate repetitive processes, manage case workflows, and forecast case outcomes.
  • To guarantee accountability and ongoing development, set up systems for routinely tracking and reporting progress.

2. Establishment of Specialized Procedures and Codes

The judiciary process if standardized then consistency can be increased by putting distinct standards for different judicial proceedings into place. It is of utmost importance that the prototype is implemented. Legal professionals, practitioners, and other interested parties should be consulted during the development of these codes.

IMPLEMENTATION:

  • To determine which areas require standardized processes, consult judges, legal experts, and other relevant parties to make sure there is a wide involvement to get a range of viewpoints and knowledge.
  • Create comprehensible, and easily available procedural codes for various legal proceedings regarding democratic issues. It should be clearly stated which violations come under this jurisdiction. To reach a large audience, use online courses, workshops, and seminars.
  • Create digital resources to help with the new codes’ implementation. Systems for managing cases electronically that use the new protocols might be one example of this.
  • Evaluation: To fix any problems and take into account suggestions, examine and update the codes on a regular basis. Create a feedback loop where users may submit suggestions for enhancements and report issues.

--

--