006 Human interaction?

https://worldlandscapearchitect.com/landscape-architects-leading-the-charge-for-climate-action/

What would be a great representation of the human interaction with nature?

We live on the Earth, the “natural” big planet in the solar system.
Human beings is a tiny, tiny and tiny creature on this planet.
They created their own habitat in the whole of sphere: urhan, suburban, village, city, metropolis, etc.
Some living things can live together in this human-centered habitats.
But it is tough for the most of them to co-exist with human….
They need their own habitat.
We need our own home, building, house, architecture.

Do we need “Landscape Architecture” to live…? Is that necessity?

Creating a building in the city is ethically simpler, right? Nature is ‘out there’ beyond the city’s boundaries. The nature here has already been destroyed, so no (further) harm, no (further) foul. But, in this age of the Anthropocene there are few places untouched by humans: at least 95% of the world’s land, excluding Antarctica, has been modified by our species. And so, when it comes to conserving the ‘natural world’, to relegate our efforts to (now-imaginary) ‘pristine’ places by protecting distinct parcels of land such as national parks, is no longer the whole solution. Although it remains vital, it’s a deferral of responsibility. (Stéph Donse is editor, researcher and writer at Molonglo.The Planthunter, 2020)