Navigate Decision Making — Half-Empty and Half-Full

Amitabh Ghosh
Leader Circle
Published in
3 min readSep 9, 2024

Decision-making is always about people. No matter how much we rely on data, facts, or logic, the human element is always there. Every team is made up of people with different priorities, personalities, and egos. When leading a group discussion, you might notice two kinds of people: the “half-full” and the “half-empty.” Both views are valid, but they reflect different mindsets.

Let’s look at the “half-empty” group first. These people see the current situation and think, “We should already be further ahead.” They might feel frustrated, believing they have done everything they needed to do and still haven’t reached the goal. They might think no one is listening to them, or they might feel like decisions are made in secret without their input. This can lead to disengagement. They see all the reasons why things are not where they should be and may focus on what’s missing.

On the other hand, the “half-full” group sees the situation differently. They see the progress made so far and think, “What do we need to do next to get to the goal?” They focus on possibilities and solutions. These team members bring ideas, propose pathways, and want to explore every option. They actively engage in discussions, eager to find a way forward. Sometimes, they might dominate conversations because they are excited about the next steps, take time away from others to drive their point. Their energy can bring urgency to decision-making but can also push for a decision they believe is right without doing their due-diligence.

As a leader, it’s important to understand both perspectives.

Each brings something valuable to the table. Those who see the glass half-empty highlight what went wrong and help us learn from past mistakes. Those who see it half-full push us to think about what could work and how to move forward. Both are essential for balanced decision-making. Ignoring one side can lead to a blind spot.

Leaders must recognize these dynamics and manage them effectively. We need to balance acknowledging the challenges with driving the team toward solutions. For example, if someone expresses frustration, it’s essential to listen and understand where they’re coming from. Sometimes, that frustration can highlight a real issue that needs to be addressed. At the same time, it’s vital to steer the conversation toward solutions. Ask, “What can we do next?” or “How can we address this concern while still moving forward?”

Decision-making is rarely perfect. There are always risks and uncertainties. But the worst decision is not making one at all. Being stuck in debate or overwhelmed by conflicting views can stall progress. That’s why it’s crucial for a leader to navigate these different emotions and perspectives carefully. Encourage team members to share their views openly but keep the discussion focused on finding a path forward.

The best decisions come from a blend of caution and optimism, learning from the past while planning for the future. We need to know where we’ve been, where we are, and where we want to go. Understanding the different perspectives in the room helps in crafting a more inclusive and smarter decision.

Do you see similar dynamics when making decisions with your team? How do you manage these emotions and still steer toward a good decision? I’d love to hear your approach!

Until next time, Cheers,

Amit

--

--