Vishesh Sharma
Oct 6 · 3 min read

Recently, the European Court of Justice has ruled that courts in the member states of the European Union can force Facebook to take down content and restrict global access to the same.

Big Brother is watching you, from 1984, by George Orwell.
Big Brother is watching you, from 1984, by George Orwell.

This is a global breakdown on ideas and we’re stepping into mass destruction where establishments rule the voices.

The ruling, that might have ripples in the global context not only on Facebook but other social media and internet in general, poses a greater question to our social hustle in the global context,

Who should control the data?

This ruling points straight to the situation that might lead to global censorship and paving the way for a nation to act as a global censor that require online platforms and the internet to act as its clowns.

Specific to this context, the top European court rules that any EU country (in this case Austria) can demand an online provider (in this case Facebook) to remove an objectionable post, and others similar to it. Along with, the court can demand so on a global scale.

In this judgement, the court has set the stage for censorship that might step in other geographies and effect citizen voice everywhere, globally as and how the govt wishes to.

Let’s explore how this might spread out.

Today’s ruling effectively gives any EU member state a green light to issue a global breakdown on ideas that speak against the govt., offends them or even seems objectionable. This particular case also poises a greater implication in the global state of affairs as it looks for censorship that isn’t bounded by geographies.

We are talking about global censorship on a potentially broad scale, crossing boundaries implying severe social discourse and political stringency on ideas and raising voices.

This, understandably is a huge claim.

To be sure, the ruling paves the way for other International bodies, judicial courts and states to make rules that will lead to global monitoring and takedown obligations of concern.

If platforms do exactly as the court/ state suggests — take down anything that is ordered and other similar combination of particular words or ideas of concern — it would almost certainly sweep in huge quantities of legitimate speech, ideas of movement and almost entirely social evolution. We’ll never see any Kony 2012 or another #HeForShe movement. Because once they will offend the establishments, they will be brought down at a single ruling.

In India, the Supreme Court is currently looking under the matter for the regulation of content on social media. And this ruling by the top European Court has set a precedent which no state can look over. Once considered and brought to the table, we’ll be stepping onto another level of global censorship with nearly 1.4 billion another set of homo sapiens will be denied the right to express, right to form ideas, and right to raise, when and if it upsets the establishment.

Image courtesy: Source

Legex

Legex is an online legal service facilitator. We ease legal accessibility, legal literacy and legal representation through our platform. Go to legex.in, look for the legal service and provide us details. We automate your legal work.

Vishesh Sharma

Written by

Legex

Legex

Legex is an online legal service facilitator. We ease legal accessibility, legal literacy and legal representation through our platform. Go to legex.in, look for the legal service and provide us details. We automate your legal work.

Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight. Watch
Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox. Explore
Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just $5/month. Upgrade