Why were the Malayan Emergency and Vietnam War so different?

Kesh Anand
Jun 12, 2019 · 3 min read
War in the tropics || Credit: Pixabay

The decades after WWII saw the countries of the world coalesce into one of three camps:

  • The First World Capitalist Western Bloc. This included the US, UK and their allies

Each camp sought to extend their influence whilst attempting to contain the spread of the others — often through conducting proxy wars.

One theatre in which these events played out was South East Asia — with the two major conflicts in the region being the Malayan Emergency and the Vietnam war.

This makes one wonder — are these conflicts that similar? If not, why not? What is the legacy of each?

A quick comparison

The conflicts — by the numbers

The Malayan venture resulted in a victory for Western Bloc with comparatively few causalities, whereas the other yielded a victory for the Eastern Bloc — but with orders of magnitude more combatant deaths.

Why the difference?

The war in Vietnam was not a simple insurgency to be quelled with brute force. It took place in a very different geographical context and had far more support from the “native” population.

State backers

An insurgency usually involves a rebellion of non-state actors against the state. In Vietnam, while the Viet Cong were portrayed by some as the primary belligerent, there was also significant support from North Vietnam (then a state), as well as China, and the USSR.

With so much money, manpower and supply provision behind them — the “insurgents” in Vietnam were able to wage a far more intense war for a much longer duration. This, in turn, resulted in a much greater number of causalities.

In contrast, the Malayan communists were almost entirely on their own — with only very little support from China.

Geography

South Vietnam was directly connected via land to a key insurgency backer — North Vietnam, who was in turn contagiously linked to China. This enabled the unrestricted flow of people and supplies to bolster the insurgency’s efforts. Further, when the path through North Vietnam was no longer a viable supply chain due to the war, an alternative path (known as the Ho Chi Minh Trail) was established through Laos and Cambodia.

Malaya had no contagious link to China and thus was not able to easily resupply either weapons or men.

Native support

Hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese fought actively in the war, and yet still more supported them. The general belief was that if there was a democratic vote — South Vietnam would vote to unify with the north. This resulted in more collaborators with the insurgents across the country.

In contrast, the native populace in Malaysia largely did not support the insurgencies, with some only 10% (or 500,000 denizens, primarily of Chinese ancestry) supporting the cause.

Legacy

Malaysia moved on, and the experience is a half-forgotten part of the national psyche.

Vietnam however, bled profusely. There were significant civilian causalities beyond just military ones. The war resulted in subsequent wars with China and Cambodia. The latter in particular resulted in a large exodus of refugees. The televised nature of the war, the quantum of damage to the country and the living memory of the diaspora mean that the Vietnam experience is still relatively fresh, and likely to be for years to come.

Lessons from History

Lessons from History is a platform for writers who share…

Sign up for Lessons from History

By Lessons from History

Lessons from History is a platform for writers who share ideas and inspirational stories from world history.  Take a look.

By signing up, you will create a Medium account if you don’t already have one. Review our Privacy Policy for more information about our privacy practices.

Check your inbox
Medium sent you an email at to complete your subscription.

Kesh Anand

Written by

An observer of history, human development, geopolitics, society, and the future

Lessons from History

Lessons from History is a platform for writers who share ideas and inspirational stories from world history. The objective is to promote history on Medium and demonstrate the value of historical writing.

Kesh Anand

Written by

An observer of history, human development, geopolitics, society, and the future

Lessons from History

Lessons from History is a platform for writers who share ideas and inspirational stories from world history. The objective is to promote history on Medium and demonstrate the value of historical writing.

Medium is an open platform where 170 million readers come to find insightful and dynamic thinking. Here, expert and undiscovered voices alike dive into the heart of any topic and bring new ideas to the surface. Learn more

Follow the writers, publications, and topics that matter to you, and you’ll see them on your homepage and in your inbox. Explore

If you have a story to tell, knowledge to share, or a perspective to offer — welcome home. It’s easy and free to post your thinking on any topic. Write on Medium

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store