The Illusion of Superiority: Why Individuals Believe They Can Beat the Financial Market
This article looks at the cognitive and psychological reasons why people who don't work in finance always think they can do better than the market. We look at where this trend came from and what it means for the people involved and for the financial industry as a whole.
Introduction:
The financial market has long been a battleground for the smartest people, with thousands of Ph.D. holders in math, economics, and other fields trying to consistently beat the market. Even though there is a lot of competition and a lot of barriers to entry, a surprising number of people who are not professionals think they can beat the market by using different strategies. This article explores the mind constructs responsible for this phenomenon and assesses the implications for both the individuals involved and the wider financial industry.
- Cognitive biases in financial decision-making
The belief that one can outperform the market can often be traced back to various cognitive biases. These biases, which include overconfidence, self-serving bias, and illusion of control, can cloud our judgment and lead to an inflated sense of our abilities.
1.1 Overconfidence
Overconfidence is a well-known cognitive bias that makes people overestimate their own skills, knowledge, and predictions. In the context of the financial market, this can result in an inflated belief in one’s capacity to outperform professional investors and generate above-market returns.
1.2 Self-serving bias
Self-serving bias refers to the tendency to attribute one’s successes to their own abilities while blaming external factors for failures. This bias can lead to a distorted perception of one’s investing performance, making individuals believe that they have a unique skill set for generating superior returns.
1.3 Illusion of control
The illusion of control is a cognitive bias in which individuals believe that they have more control over outcomes than they actually do. In the financial market, this can manifest as the belief that one’s investment decisions have a direct impact on market performance, despite the fact that the market is influenced by countless factors outside of any single individual’s control.
2. The role of the Dunning-Kruger effect
The Dunning-Kruger effect is a type of cognitive bias in which people who aren't very good at something overestimate how good they are, while people who are good at something underestimate how good they are. In the context of financial market investment, this can lead inexperienced investors to believe that they have a greater understanding of the market than they actually do, while professionals may be more aware of the limitations of their knowledge and abilities.
3. Social influence and financial markets
The impact of social influence cannot be understated when examining the reasons behind individuals’ beliefs in their ability to beat the market. In a world where social media and instant communication are pervasive, the opinions and successes of others can easily distort one’s perception of their own abilities.
4. The implications of the illusion of superiority
When people think they can do better than the market, they may choose riskier ways to invest, which can cost them money. On a larger scale, this may lead to more speculative bubbles and make market downturns worse.
5. The allure of technical analysis and self-proclaimed experts
The appeal of technical analysis and the influence of self-proclaimed experts, particularly on social media platforms, further exacerbate the phenomenon of people believing they can beat the market.
5.1 Technical analysis as a panacea
Many newly improvised pro traders view technical analysis as the key to unlocking market patterns and predicting future price movements. They might rely too much on one tool or a small set of techniques, not realizing the limits of technical analysis and how important it is to use other types of analysis, like fundamental and quantitative approaches.
5.2 The rise of self-proclaimed experts on social media
Because of the internet and social media, there are now a lot of people who say they are experts in finance but don't have any training or experience in the field. These individuals may present themselves as knowledgeable authorities on financial markets and technical analysis, but their advice is frequently based on anecdotal evidence, personal opinions, or superficial understanding of the market. The widespread availability of such content can create an illusion of expertise among aspiring traders, leading them to believe they are better equipped to make sound financial decisions than they actually are.
5.3 The impact of obscure graphical patterns and false signals
Often, new investors are drawn to complicated graphs that promise to show them hidden market signals. Some of these patterns are complicated chart formations or indicators that are seen as good predictors of how prices will move in the future. But these patterns often send false signals and are often based on subjective interpretations, so they are not good ways to predict how the market will do. Because of this, people who make financial decisions based on these strange patterns are more likely to have bad investment results.
5.4 Financial decision-making based on tweets and online content
In the age of instant communication and information overload, it is not uncommon for people to make financial decisions based on tweets, blog posts, or other online content from self-proclaimed experts. This type of decision-making is problematic as it can lead to impulsive, emotionally-driven choices that disregard the need for thorough analysis and understanding of market dynamics. This approach can result in losses and reduced long-term financial success.
By addressing the allure of technical analysis and the influence of self-proclaimed experts, investors can better recognize the limitations of these approaches and avoid overconfidence in their ability to outperform the market. When making financial decisions, it is important for people to take a more thorough and well-rounded approach that takes into account the market's inherent complexity and uncertainty.
Conclusion:
The belief that one can consistently outperform the financial market is driven by a combination of cognitive biases, social influences, and the Dunning-Kruger effect. Understanding these factors can help investors maintain a more realistic assessment of their abilities and reduce the risks associated with overconfidence in the financial markets. Financial education and increased awareness of these biases could play a critical role in mitigating the negative consequences of the illusion of superiority.
Libertify has created the first safety feature for crypto investors, called the crypto seatbelt. The crypto seatbelt adjusts the level of risk for each of your tokens in accordance with your risk profile thanks to cutting-edge artificial intelligence. Like a driver adjusts its speed to face unexpected events, the crypto seatbelt constantly adapts your optimal risk exposure to free your mind when you invest. Libertify protects your money from market swings by making smart decisions and lowering the risk of your portfolio by more than 30%. It brings you avant-garde technologies from big banks in your pocket. You just need to connect your exchange account and your defi wallet to Libertify risk management solution. It’s time to take the power back on your money. Buckle up now with your crypto seatbelt and enjoy the ride.
