Zonal pricing for electricity — The experience of Austria
Podcast with Valerie Reif & Christine Materazzi-Wagner
In the context of the FSR Policy Workshop on ‘Nodal Vs Zonal Pricing for the Electricity Market’, Valerie Reif (FSR) interviewed the panellist Christine Materazzi-Wagner, Director of Electricity at E-Control, the Austrian regulatory authority. The workshop explored the possible benefits and relative challenges of implementing a nodal market structure in the European electricity market.
In the podcast, Ms Materazzi-Wagner talks about her personal takeaways from the workshop, the EU target model for electricity and the possibilities of moving towards a nodal approach in Europe. She also shares her views on recent market developments in Austria in the context of the German-Austrian bidding zone split in October 2018.
More from the workshop:
The first session of the workshop reviewed the international experience with nodal and zonal pricing, including their impact on market liquidity and efficiency. The audience engaged with scholars and practitioners with direct experience in these markets to discuss the main opportunities and challenges such as pricing structures pose. This discussion subsequently introduced the second session, focusing on the potential for Europe to adopt a nodal market design.
The event caught the interest of a vast variety of stakeholders: generators and suppliers, energy traders, power exchanges, transmission system operators, national regulatory authorities, European and national policy-makers. The majority of the academics were in favour of nodal pricing, whereas the various stakeholders expressed a more nuanced view. Some were mildly in favour of nodal prices, while others clearly supported a zonal approach.
Increased efficiency in the dispatch of the generating units and reduced re-dispatching costs were highlighted as one of the most relevant benefits of introducing nodal pricing. By better signalling local grid conditions, nodal pricing would provide generators and consumers with adequate incentives, taking into account the physical constraints, both when investing in new capacity and when trading energy on the wholesale market. With the ongoing transformation of the generation mix, such incentives are extremely important and could reduce the overall costs of the energy transition. On the other hand, nodal prices do not provide system operators with optimal signals for the grid expansion, nor do they ensure the recovery of the grid’s fixed costs. Moreover, for some of the attendees, the introduction of nodal pricing may decrease the liquidity in wholesale markets and allow, under certain circumstances, some market players to exert stronger market power.
The debate highlighted the fact that beyond any theoretical merit or drawback, policy-makers should be aware of the costs of moving from one system to another and the political obstacles that may prevent a smooth transition. Indeed, several stakeholders suggested that the current European governance of the electricity system would be unfit for a change in the pricing method. In their view, it would be easier and wiser to first fully implement the existing rules and improve the implementation of zonal pricing before venturing into the introduction of nodal prices.
Related resources:
The Digital World Knocks at Electricity’s Door: Six Building Blocks to Understand Why (by Jean-Michel Glachant and Nicolò Rossetto)
Join the Lights on Women Community:
Subscribe to our mailing list and let us know if you want to contribute.
