Cookie Crumble

Preyansh Shah
Marketing in the Age of Digital
5 min readApr 9, 2023

Cześć! (Hello in Polish)

For the last few weeks, we have only discussed wine and bread, and to be honest, I am missing that sugar rush to get those creative juices flowing. Aren’t you? How about we talk about cookies?

Oh! Not those unhealthy sugar cookies! I am talking about the annoying website pop-ups that want to track your online activities.

For years, tracking cookies have been the backbone of digital advertising, enabling marketers to target users with personalized ads based on their browsing behavior. However, with growing concerns about privacy and data security, major web browsers and regulators have started phasing out tracking cookies. While the move is lauded for protecting user privacy, it has significant implications for both users and marketers.

Cookies are text files with small pieces of data that are used to identify and target a user

Let’s take a closer look at the positive and negative aspects of the end of tracking cookies from the perspectives of both users and marketers.

Positives first! Customers first!

Tracking cookies are notorious for collecting vast amounts of user data without explicit consent. The end of tracking cookies means that users will have more control over their online privacy. They won’t be continuously tracked across websites, which can reduce the risk of their data being collected and shared without their knowledge.

Tracking cookies have been responsible for the inundation of users with targeted ads, which can feel intrusive and overwhelming. With the end of tracking cookies, users may see a reduction in the number of targeted ads they encounter while browsing the internet, leading to a less intrusive online experience.

Cookies help companies target their audience and shape a few of the purchase decisions made by them

Tracking cookies can be exploited by malicious actors for antisocial purposes, such as identity theft and fraud. By eliminating tracking cookies, users may be less vulnerable to such security breaches, leading to a safer online environment.

However, while many users find targeted ads invasive, they can also be beneficial when they are relevant to their interests and needs. Without tracking cookies, users may receive less personalized ads, resulting in less relevant recommendations and promotions. The million-dollar question is whether to choose privacy or not to choose privacy.

Many websites rely on revenue from advertising to provide free content to users. Without tracking cookies, marketers may have reduced targeting capabilities, leading to lower advertising revenues for websites. This could result in websites resorting to paywalls or subscriptions, limiting access to previously free content. The temptation that the word “free” brings is probably one of the most contributing factors to the cookies issue being so controversial.

Banning third-party cookies will increase irrelevant ads for the audience

To compensate for the reduced targeting capabilities, marketers may resort to increasing the frequency of ads to reach a wider audience. This could result in users being exposed to more ads, which may be perceived as annoying and intrusive.

It is clear that marketers have a job ahead of them to find alternatives to cookies. With the end of tracking cookies, marketers are forced to rely more on first-party data, which is data collected directly from users who have explicitly given consent. This shift can foster more transparent and trusting relationships between marketers and users, as users are more likely to provide consent for data collection when they have control over it. Give them control to give you control? Smart use of Psychology!

Have you ever noticed why you see car ads just before you start a car review on YouTube? That’s called contextual targeting, which involves targeting ads based on the content of the webpage rather than user behavior, which may see a resurgence. This can be an opportunity for marketers to create relevant ads that are aligned with the content users are viewing, rather than relying solely on user behavior data.

An example of contextual targeting

The end of tracking cookies can also benefit marketers regarding data security. With fewer tracking cookies in use, the risk of data breaches and security vulnerabilities associated with tracking cookies may be reduced, safeguarding the integrity and confidentiality of user data.

However, every coin has 2 sides, and tracking cookies have provided marketers with valuable insights into user behavior and preferences, enabling them to deliver highly targeted ads. The end of tracking cookies can limit the ability of marketers to deliver personalized ads, potentially resulting in lower ad performance and return on investment (ROI).

Many marketers have built their advertising strategies around tracking cookies, and the end of tracking cookies can disrupt these strategies. Marketers may need to invest in new technologies and strategies to adapt to the changing landscape, which may require additional resources and efforts.

Marketers will find alternatives to cookies to target their audience

Marketers may also face the challenge of decreased advertising revenues for websites and platforms that rely on tracking cookies for targeting. Reduced targeting capabilities may result in lower click-through rates (CTR), conversion rates, and overall ad performance, leading to potential loss of revenue for marketers.

As the digital advertising landscape continues to evolve, marketers need to adapt their strategies and explore alternative methods of targeting and personalization. This may involve investing in technologies like machine learning and artificial intelligence to analyze data privacy consciously, leveraging contextual targeting, and focusing on building transparent and trusting relationships with users through explicit consent and data governance.

As for users, it’s important to stay informed about changes in online tracking practices and take control of their privacy settings. They can use browser settings to block or delete cookies, opt out of tracking, and carefully review the privacy policies of websites and apps they visit. Additionally, users can be cautious about sharing their personal information online and only provide consent for data collection when they feel comfortable doing so.

Google plans to ban third-party cookies by end of 2024

In conclusion, the end of tracking cookies has both positive and negative implications for both users and marketers. It is a complex issue that requires a balance between privacy and personalization in the digital advertising landscape. As the industry continues to evolve, stakeholders need to work collaboratively toward finding a middle ground that respects user privacy while enabling marketers to deliver relevant and meaningful ads.

Keep an eye out for the end of 2024 when Google plans to ban the use of third-party cookies.

-Ps.

This blog was edited by Eva Khanpara

--

--

Preyansh Shah
Marketing in the Age of Digital

Weekly blogs related to Marketing Branding, etc. by an NYU Grad student.