Crisis in the Kitchen: Daily Harvest’s Social Media Snafu

Maxine Mchunguzi
Marketing in the Age of Digital
3 min readNov 6, 2023

Muses,

Alright, gather ‘round because today’s tale is piping hot, complete with some ‘hold my smoothie’ moments. After a long day, we all dream of that perfect meal, right? Now, imagine that craving led to hospital trips. This isn’t some dark foodie fantasy. No, this happened with the very brand we’ve come to love: Daily Harvest.

Who is Daily Harvest?
Picture your trendiest mate who’s got kale chips in one hand and a detox smoothie in the other. That’s Daily Harvest for you! Delivering plant-based goodness straight to our homes, they’ve been the champions of convenient, healthy living. Until, of course, things went haywire.

‘So, what’s the tea?
Bloomberg spilled all the beans (or should I say lentils?) on Daily Harvest’s mishap with their French Lentil + Leek Crumbles. Now, we aren’t talking a mild tummy rumble, rather about 130 hospitalisations, with a whopping 40 individuals needing gallbladder surgeries. The chaos doesn’t end there. Despite facing such severe health reactions, customers were left playing detective on Reddit threads. Why? Because Daily Harvest’s response on social media was, for a lack of a better word, icy. Instead of an immediate acknowledgement or action, customers were met with silence, vague mentions, or worse, promotions of the very product in question.

How did they handle it?
When realisation dawned after a viral TikTok by influencer Abby Silverman, what did the brand offer as an apology? Gift cards that would barely cover a smoothie, let alone medical bills. In a classic product recall scenario, there’s usually a big red STOP button. But, not this time. Daily Harvest took a rather ‘chilled’ approach. Two distinct emails were dispatched: one for those who had consumed the crumbles and another for those yet to dive in. The kicker? The word ‘recall’ only appeared about a week into the disaster. CEO Rachel Drori’s stance? A recall is all about telling folks to “not consume and dispose.” Talk about semantics! This was especially disappointing considering they built most of their following from their consistent and effective social media campaigns.

What’s the problem?
While Drori tried to paint the picture that they handled the situation with ‘transparency, immediacy, and customer empathy’ during the crisis, the canvas told a different story. Influencers who once sang Daily Harvest’s praises felt betrayed. Customers were left fuming. The brand’s response on social media? Well, it wasn’t much of a response. Instead of creating fresh posts alerting users, they chose to sneakily edit captions of past posts, nudging folks to a bio link for more info. It’s akin to whispering ‘fire’ in a packed theater instead of sounding an alarm. But when safety is at stake, communication should be paramount, directness saves. Since that tumultuous period, Daily Harvest has turned a new leaf, actively engaging on Instagram and consistently updating customers with the latest findings from their investigations.

In Retrospect:
It is key to remember in today’s digital age, social media isn’t just a platform for advertising; it’s a pivotal vehicle to cultivate and nurture genuine relationships with customers, bridging the gap between brand and consumer. Brands will stumble; it’s a given. But, it’s the recovery, the genuine outreach, and the corrective measures that make all the difference. Here, Daily Harvest slipped, tripped, and face-planted, leaving a trail of disgruntled customers and a tarnished reputation. In the dynamic world of brand trust, this misstep might cost Daily Harvest a significant harvest of loyal patrons. But hey, everyone loves a good redemption arc. We’ll watch, wait, and hope they bounce back stronger.

--

--

Maxine Mchunguzi
Marketing in the Age of Digital

Traveller, foodie, Masters student and now blogger? Follow along to hear more about my marketing musings.