Absolute Pricing Authority — Costco Branding for Emerging Markets

Chia Jeng Yang
Messy Problems
Published in
5 min readFeb 19, 2021

Between Two VCs - From a conversation between Akshay Bajaj [SIG] and myself, Chia Jeng Yang [Saison Capital].

We talked about the concept of Absolute Pricing Authority, the Costco model, and its relevance for emerging markets.

What is the purpose of a Brand?

Brands are mental associations meant to increase conversions behind a job to be done and a particular action.

Healthy living? Saladstop.

Need to run? Nike.

E-commerce payments? Stripe.

Brands are always associated with a job to be done, and typically focus on quality [i.e. we are the best quality for the job to be done].

Affordability sometimes comes into the picture in that you associate a particular brand with affordability [i.e. Walmart], but what if we take the affordability branding to the extreme?

What if we want to build a brand that tries to tackle the job to be done of ‘confidence in lowest possible price of the market’, what is described as the Brand of “Absolute Pricing Authority”.

Sinegal mentioned in a recent lecture that he prides Costco on having “absolute pricing authority”. It means customers can be absolutely sure that Costco has the lowest prices anywhere. There’s only one company at a time that can deliver on this promise!

When consumers in emerging markets shop, they are generally first and foremost optimizing for cost. Ease of mind that the platform they are shopping in has the absolute best bargain for them prevents leakage through price checking/comparison, and increases revisit, consumer mindshare and conversion rates.

As noted by Micah Browns, a branding expert, consumers don’t want to work to discern value. They want it to be immediately apparent.

We are then not optimizing for ‘everyday brand pricing’, we are optimizing for total confidence of Absolute Pricing Authority — that I do not need to attempt to look elsewhere.

Building Absolute Pricing Authority for a set of key SKUs can help to drive volume will allow you to be the gatekeeper of that SKU in that market.

With that brand trust and SKU volumes, it provides companies a wedge to tackle each SKU category one SKU at a time.

Amazon, however, did the opposite. They have spent years building one of the most powerful discount brands in the world. So powerful, in fact, that we don’t even remember the products themselves; only that they came from Amazon. To consumers, cheap + convenient = Amazon. — Adam Keesling

The Absolute Pricing Authority framework is particularly exciting for emerging markets, which are extremely cost-sensitive. Brand building for quality or luxury takes a back seat to price.

This is not new — supermarkets have a few key SKUs which are loss-leaders, typically daily essentials sold at or below cost that help promote recurring consumer purchases, and cross-selling through other higher margin products.

An interesting and important side-point to Absolute Pricing Authority is the SKU concentration. Building Absolute Pricing Authority has the effect of maintaining discipline on SKU growth, restricting adding SKUs

I have not been able to find much research out there about Revenue:SKU ratios for top performing marketplaces and retailers, but have a strong suspicion that as e-commerce becomes more and more verticalized, that Revenue:SKU ratios will became a key metric for emerging vertical marketplaces to keep an eye on.

This was very different from the early days of general e-commerce marketplaces where some marketplaces optimized for SKU count (at all cost) and it was a key metric for GMV growth.

This can be seen in the case of Muji, a popular Japanese retailer, an abbreviation for ‘Mujirushi Ryōhin’ (which translates to “no brand, quality products”).

MUJI: Starting with only an essential of 9 household items and 31 food products, the retailer now has over 7,000 SKUs and has expanded into apparel, travel, electronics, health and beauty, stationery, and more.

With five or six super-wide aisles, Aldi only stocks around 1,400 items — compared to around 40,000 at traditional supermarkets and more than 100,000 at Walmart supercenters.

Dealshare, an Indian Matrix-backed Indian Social Commerce platform: With an average of 1,000 stock-keeping units (SKU) across different categories, DealShare delivers about 25,000 orders daily. At present, it has around 1,000 manufacturers and suppliers, of which 70% are regional or local.

Anecdotally, most marketplaces adopting this philosophy seem to cap out at 5–7k SKUs.

Absolute Pricing Authority is not just about blindly burning money on price wars or simply building private-label products.

A Forbes autopsy of Brandless noted that, unlike Muji which promoted its cheap prices because of its deep horizontal supply-chain, Brandless’ simply took stock from the same suppliers that supplied their competitors and lowered prices.

For a startup with limited resources, this indicates a very heavy vertical focus on key SKUs for key consumer segments, identifying key supply chain inefficiencies and building a roadmap for domination within those segments. Although a fairly new concept in Asia, I have already come across multiple traditional verticalized Costco-models. Incidentally, this principle overlaps with some work I am doing over full-stack e-commerce marketplace models which I will link here when published.

In my next instalment, I will talk with Akshay Bajaj about the logistics infrastructure that works underneath this Costco model. [Link to be posted here when article is out].

I am particularly interested in chatting with folks thinking or building Costco for Asia. If you are doing work or thinking in this space, ping me at jengyang.chia@creditsaison-ap.com

Chia Jeng Yang, Principal at Saison Capital, dives into consumer, SaaS, and fintech investment trends across the U.S. and Asia, builds projects in the venture capital and public policy space, works closely with early-stage (Pre-A) founders and can be contacted at jengyang.chia@gmail.com. Previous work here: http://chiajy.com

--

--