#BLM Meets Sexual Harassment: Why Intersectionality is Imperative

Clemence Bouchard
Metta Space Publications
4 min readFeb 21, 2023

In celebration of Black History Month, we wanted to dive into how intersectionality has affected sexual harassment, especially for women of color.

For those who may not know, intersectionality is defined as “the interconnected nature of social categorizations such as race, class, and gender as they apply to a given individual or group, regarded as creating overlapping and interdependent systems of discrimination or disadvantage.”

That’s an academic way of saying while we may all face some discrimination at some point, the discrimination that white women face is not the same as that faced by Black women, Latinx women, Asian women, or Trans women.

Another discriminatory factor will intersect their experiences. Even though intersectionality is being discussed in feminism, creating a more inclusive space for all, race is mainly absent when talking about the implications of sexual harassment.

Sexual harassment creates a toxic work environment due to implicit or explicit overtones. A more nuanced approach to this would be understanding that sexual harassment is a tool driven to maintain power or dominance; it is derived from respect in the workplace.

A recent Harvard Business Review survey found that 34% of female employees have been sexually harassed by a colleague. While we typically think of sexual harassment as the hierarchical superior boss taking advantage of a subordinate, 1 in 4 Black women reported that their perpetrator was a more junior colleague.

The respect given to more senior white women is not reciprocated towards Black women. And while recognizing that sexual harassment happens to both genders, with only 6% of men reporting being sexually harassed, black men are more likely to have been sexually harassed by a colleague than white men (20% vs. 13%).

HR managers, when encouraging any person to report sexual harassment, ensure your approach is intersectional; otherwise, you may be leaving behind some of the most vulnerable staff members.

With the rise of the #MeToo (2017) and #BlackLivesMatter (2013, with more relevance gained in 2020) movements, these issues have been prominent so our psyches that it is easy for us to think this is a new issue.

It is not.

Using the public Equal Employment Opportunity Commission database, there seems to be a decrease in sexual harassment claims from 1997 to 2016, which has not been equitable across all races.

The number of claims by white women has been steadily decreasing, while the rates for Black women have maintained at the same pace. And don’t get me wrong — I am not taking away from the win that reporting systems are working and that the levels have begun to decrease.

However, this trend shows us the shift in reasons and actions for harassment rather than the changes in the willingness to report. In 1996, Black women were 1.7 times as likely as white women to report sexual harassment, whereas, in 2016, they were 3.8 times as likely.

This highlights another reason for the importance of intersectionality in our analysis of harassment and gender. In this case, albeit incomplete, there has been a shift from the harassment of white women to the harassment of Black women.

The decline in sexual harassment has disproportionately benefited white women, who are much less likely to experience sexual harassment than Black women.

Harassers and abusers are aware of the power relationships in workplaces. Harassment is a power display, and they have decided to shift the focus of their attacks toward more vulnerable women in their workplaces.

As we know, many factors go through the target’s head when they decide to report or not to report their sexual harassment complaints.

For all women, but especially women of color, there can be a cultural factor that deters women from reporting: submissiveness in response to machismo, taboos on discussing sexual natures, concerns about how their community will perceive them as a victim, and the impulse to deny harassment when the harasser is from the community of colors themselves, as not to make the whole community look bad or make the stereotypes real.

When analyzing it from an abuser’s perspective, stereotypes play a massive role in the message that women of color have. Latinx women are “hot-blooded.” Black women are “jezebels.” Asian women are “submissive and exotic.”

These stereotypes all boil down to the same message that women of color are promiscuous sexual beings and that sexual harassment is inevitable for them. Gender and race are so inexplicably linked, especially when it comes to harassment, that we need to use intersectionality to craft sexual harassment policies that embrace the intersectional differences of women to protect all targets.

And our system is just not there yet. When you couple that with the overall distrust that women have in which their reports will make a difference, how can we have women of color trust that their voice will make a difference when all these workplaces and other institutions have been notorious for letting them down and leaving them behind?

Supporting #MeToo and #BlackLivesMatter means we actively stop sidelining the stories and recognize that intersectionality is crucial for combatting, preventing, and eradicating sexual harassment for all, regardless of gender or race.

Written By: Apollina “Polly” Kyle, Research Ambassador at Metta Space

Edited By: Paula Koller-Alonso, Head of Research & Development at Metta Space

--

--