Setting Up Server Side Rendering with React, Redux, and Django
At Meural, we decided to implement server side rendering in order to increase our SEO exposure and to make social media sharing more effective. In this post, I’ll talk about how server side rendering works and the implementation that I developed.
Background
In traditional web applications, web pages are rendered on the client side. The browser receives a blob of JavaScript from the server, processes it, and paints the UI that the user sees. In server rendered applications, on the other hand, the first render of a web page is done on the server. The browser receives a pre-rendered page, which it can display without running any JavaScript. This enables better SEO exposure, since many web crawlers cannot run JavaScript, and faster perceived page load times.
There are also some downsides to server side rendering. These include slower server response time and, in lower bandwidth environments, slower time to interactive. For apps that run behind login screens, whose content is private, these downsides might make server side rendering less than worthwhile. For our use case, however, the benefits well outweigh the costs. Most of our app’s pages are public facing, so exposure to web crawlers is essential.
Preliminary Considerations
Implementing server side rendering is not a trivial task. In response to this fact, a number of libraries have emerged to make implementation a bit easier. These include Next.js, Razzle, numerous boilerplates, and others.
These libraries and frameworks can be a good choice for rapidly prototyping a feature or when starting a new app, but I would not recommend them for use in production or for extant apps. The reason for this is that using them requires surrendering a large portion of your codebase to them, which makes debugging and optimization more difficult, if not impossible, and makes you ignorant of how your app is really working. What’s more, integrating such a framework into an extant application is often more trouble than it’s worth.
Therefore, I developed a custom implementation of server side rendering at Meural. I hope that our stack is similar enough to that of other companies so that other developers might find this article useful. Our frontend uses React, React Router 3, and Redux, while our backend is a monolithic Django application.
The High-Level View
At a high level, setting up server side rendering consists in setting up the following chain of events.
Since our primary application server is a Django application, which cannot understand JavaScript, we need a JavaScript runtime to render our React frontend. For this, we’ll use a Node server. When a request hits our primary Django server, we’ll query our database to get the info we need. Next we’ll send that info in an HTTP POST
request to our Node server, which will return our markup, plus the final state of our Redux store. Finally, we’ll embed this information into the HTML response of our Django app and send it to the client.
Node-Django Interaction
Let’s begin by setting up the Node server. I decided to use Express.js because it is battle-tested and very easy to use. Note that we are reading our NODE_HOST
and NODE_PORT
variables from our runtime environment.
I recommend writing a simple render
and buildInitialState
functions for testing purposes that simply return some valid output of any kind. I also recommend testing this server with cURL before moving on to anything else.
Now let’s wire up the Django app and test it’s interaction with the Node server.
Here’s how we insert the rendered HTML payload into our Django template. Note that we use Webpack and django-webpack-loader to handle our client-side JavaScript.
We can now test the interaction between Node and Django. Let’s start the Node server and the Django server, open up a browser, and go to the url that corresponds to our sandwich view. To prevent our React frontend from taking over the page on load, we’ll disable JavaScript in DevTools. If you see a page with the output that you defined in your render
and buildInitialState
functions, then all is well.
Defining the Render Function
It will be instructive to first look at the code of the render function and then to explain how it works.
The first thing the render function does is configure the Redux store. I used the same configureStore
function that I had already defined in following the usual Redux API pattern.
The second thing the render function does is get the frontend routes of my React app, by calling a function I wrote called getRoutes
. This function takes the Redux store as an argument and returns all of the routes to my app. It prevents code duplication because I can call it in both server and browser environments (See the Handling the Client Side section below to see how it is used in a browser environment).
The name getRoutes
, though accurate, is somewhat incomplete. The function does not just get routes. It also gets the React components of which my app is composed, since they are embedded in the definitions of the routes themselves. Therefore, the getRoutes
function is what links my existing React app to the render function.
Next, in order for the render function to match the desired route, I use React Router’s match
function. This function’s first argument is an object containing all of my app’s routes as its first key — which we have from the getRoutes
function — and the desired route as the second key. The match
function’s second argument is a callback that gets evoked after matching is complete. In a successful matching, this callback’s third argument is a renderProps
object. These renderProps
represent the state of my app’s props at a given route. I pass this object into React-Router’s <RouterContext>
component (which is a static version of its more familiar <Router>
component) to render the state of our app at the matched route.
To give the components of my app access to the Redux store, I wrap the <RouterContext>
component with the <Provider>
component from the React-Redux library.
Next, I call ReactDOMServer#renderToString
with this wrapped component as its argument to render the state of my application at the matched route to HTML.
Finally, I call getState
on my Redux store to extract its final state in case the rendering process changed anything.
If the match
function fails to match the desired route, the second argument of its callback is a redirectLocation
argument. In this case, I recursively call the render function with this new desired route. I am confident that there will never be a chain of infinite redirects because I have defined a wildcard route to handle such cases.
Calling the Render Function
The render function will not work as it is currently defined. The reason for this is that the JSX used in the function itself, as well as in the rest of my app, is not understood in Node runtimes. Therefore, I use Webpack and Babel to transpile my render.jsx
file into Node compliant code. All I had to do to make this work was to copy my existing webpack config, change the entry point to render.jsx
, and replace the target parameter with target: ‘node’
.
When transpiling, I ran into some errors. Since this version of my React app will not be running in the browser, window
and document
will not be defined. Therefore, I had to move all references to window
and document
to functions that are executed only after the DOM is accessible. This involved moving references to window
and document
from methods like Component#constructor
to methods like Component#componentDidMount
. Unlike Component#constructor
, Component#componentDidMount
will only be called after the component has been mounted to the DOM. I also had to abandon some third-party libraries that relied on window
or document
in problematic places.
Handling the Client Side
Now that my server responds with a fully rendered page of my app, I need to adjust my client side JS to expect this. Here’s the code I wrote.
You might have noticed that I added an async
attribute to my script tag in base.html
. The async
attribute makes the tag non-render-blocking, which means that the browser won’t wait for the entire script to download before rendering. This produces a considerable speed increase, especially with large JavaScript bundles. However, it also means that it is possible for the script to be executed at any time during the load process, which means that the standard procedure of waiting for DOMContentLoaded
before rendering with ReactDOM
might not always work, since DOMContentLoaded
might have already fired, in which case, the React app would never get executed and the page would never become interactive. Therefore, I check the document.readyState
when the bundle is initially executed. If the readyState
is complete
or interactive
, I initialize my React app right away. Otherwise, I add listener for DOMContentLoaded
and use my initialize function as the callback.
In my initializeApp
function, I get the current state of the Redux store from the window
and pass it into configureStore
to setup Redux. Next, I match the current route, just as I did on the server side, using the same getRoutes
and match
functions which I discussed above. Instead of calling ReactDOM#render
, which is the usual pattern in client rendered apps, I call ReactDOM#hydrate
, which sets up React’s virtual DOM and installs listeners to make the page interactive.
Conclusion
Since deploying this project, we have seen much better SEO at Meural. Now a Google search for the terms meural
and some artist’s name will yield a result of that artist’s page or one of her playlists, if that artist is in our collection. Prior to this deployment, this was not possible, since we had exposed only one webpage, which contained our single-page React app.