Why the U.K. Coronavirus Strain Just Got (Slightly) Deadlier, To Our Surprise

Wasn’t SARS-CoV-2 supposed to become less deadly as it evolves? After all, a dead host is a dead-end for viruses.

Shin Jie Yong, MSc (Res)
Microbial Instincts

--

Image by rawpixel.com

Author’s note: A few clarifications have been added at the end of this article.

About a week post-publication, about 250 news outlets have covered the new study showing that people infected with the B.1.1.7 coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) strain — first discovered in the U.K. around Sept 2020 and has now spread to over 90 countries — are 64% more likely to die than those infected with prior strains or variants.

This probably comes as a surprise since many of us thought that SARS-CoV-2 would become milder over time. After all, as viruses couldn’t live without a host, a dead host is a dead-end for viruses. So, what’s the point of killing the host quicker? This article will explain why this assumption is not necessarily true and why SARS-CoV-2 just got deadlier.

Although there’s debate on the term usage between strains and variants, this article defines a strain as a viral variant that has evolved a different biological property.

The new study that confirms what we don’t want

--

--

Microbial Instincts
Microbial Instincts

Published in Microbial Instincts

Decoding the microbial angle to health and microbial world (under Medium Boost program).

Shin Jie Yong, MSc (Res)
Shin Jie Yong, MSc (Res)

Written by Shin Jie Yong, MSc (Res)

Named Stanford's world top 1% scientists | Medium's boost nominator | National athlete | Ghostwriter | Get my Substack: https://theinfectedneuron.substack.com/

Responses (15)