A History of Airborne Troops: Part 2 — The Rise of Airborne Operations in World War II

Sina Taghva
Military Minds
Published in
9 min readJan 13, 2024

This is the second installment in our three-part series delving into the history of airborne units. Here, we chronicle the daring exploits and strategic evolution of these forces during World War II. From groundbreaking operations in Denmark to the decisive actions in the Rhineland, we unpack the development of airborne tactics and their profound impact on the war and military doctrine.

Denmark & Norway

The dawn of combat airborne operations was witnessed during the invasion of Denmark and Norway in April 1940, marking the first instance of such troops being used in battle. German Fallschirmjäger (paratroopers) were deployed with precision and speed, seizing critical airfields and bridges, effectively neutralizing the Danish and Norwegian defenses before they could fully mobilize. This operation demonstrated not only the element of surprise inherent to airborne forces but also the potential for rapid and decisive action that could turn the tide of an engagement before traditional forces had time to react. The success of these early airborne assaults would cement their role as a crucial component of military strategy in the years to follow.

Belgium & Netherlands

The airborne assault on Eben Emael and the subsequent operations in Rotterdam in May 1940 showcased the formidable capabilities of airborne units in achieving tactical surprise. German paratroopers and glider-borne troops swiftly overcame the Belgian fortress of Eben Emael, thought to be impregnable, which protected the vital bridges over the Albert Canal. This key victory allowed the German forces to bypass the formidable Belgian defenses and advance into the country’s interior. Similarly, the assault on Rotterdam demonstrated the ability of airborne forces to sow chaos and disarray among enemy ranks, contributing to the rapid fall of the Netherlands. These early uses of airborne troops in World War II underscored their strategic value and the necessity for rapid innovation in defense against such threats.

German DFS 230 troop-carrying glider
German DFS 230 troop-carrying glider

As World War II progressed, the application of airborne forces evolved significantly from the initial operations in Denmark and Norway. Military leaders analyzed the outcomes of these actions, refining tactics to maximize the strengths of paratroopers and airlanding units. Training intensified, focusing on nighttime drops, navigation, and small-unit tactics to improve the effectiveness of airborne soldiers upon landing. The Allies and the Axis powers both recognized the importance of integrating airborne operations with conventional forces, leading to more sophisticated joint operations. These advancements in airborne tactics were a direct response to the early successes and failures of the war, reflecting a rapid learning curve and adaptability that would be put to the test in subsequent large-scale deployments, shaping the very nature of airborne warfare.

Crete

The Battle of Crete in May 1941 stands as one of the most significant airborne operations of World War II, highlighting both the potential and the peril of airborne warfare. German forces, primarily composed of paratroopers and mountain troops, embarked on an ambitious plan to capture the strategically crucial island of Crete. The initial phase saw paratroopers dropping directly onto key airfields and strategic locations across the island. Despite facing fierce resistance from Allied troops, including British, Australian, New Zealand, and Greek forces, the Germans managed to secure vital airfields. These captured airfields then served as landing zones for additional troops and supplies, tipping the balance in favor of the Germans. The operation, though ultimately successful, was a hard-fought battle with heavy resistance, showcasing the audacity and tactical innovation of airborne assaults.

However, the victory in Crete came at a staggering cost for the German airborne forces. The casualties sustained during the operation were alarmingly high; the paratroopers, vulnerable during their descent and in the initial phase of the engagement, suffered significant losses. The extent of these casualties had a profound impact on the German High Command. The losses were so severe that they led to a reevaluation of the use of large-scale airborne operations. The High Command, including Hitler himself, was shocked by the scale of the losses and became hesitant to authorize similar large-scale airborne assaults in the future. This shift in perspective marked a turning point in how the German military approached the use of airborne troops, with a greater emphasis being placed on more conventional uses of these forces and a notable reluctance to undertake similar airborne operations on the scale of Crete.

Fallschirmjäger landing on Crete in 1941
Fallschirmjäger landing on Crete in 1941

In World War II, the strategic deployment of airborne forces by the Allied and Axis powers showcased divergent approaches and philosophies. The Axis, particularly the Germans, initially led in airborne tactics, emphasizing surprise assaults and rapid seizure of key objectives, as seen in operations like Crete and Eben Emael. Their use of paratroopers was primarily offensive, aimed at destabilizing enemy defenses and paving the way for ground forces. On the other hand, the Allies, learning from the early successes and failures of the Axis, gradually developed their airborne capabilities, focusing on large-scale operations like the Normandy landings. Their approach often involved dropping airborne units to secure critical areas, disrupt enemy communications, and facilitate the advance of main ground forces. This strategic contrast between the Allies and Axis in the utilization of airborne troops underscored the adaptability and versatility of such forces in different military doctrines and played a significant role in shaping the outcome of numerous battles during the war.

German paratrooper wearing a Stahlhelm and carrying an MG 42 machine gun in the Soviet Union (1942)
German paratrooper wearing a Stahlhelm and carrying an MG 42 machine gun in the Soviet Union (1942)

Normandy

The first major Allied airborne operations of World War II, including the iconic Normandy landings, marked a turning point in the use of airborne troops in combat. In these operations, Allied forces demonstrated a refined understanding and application of airborne warfare. The Normandy landings, particularly, exemplified this with the deployment of thousands of paratroopers behind enemy lines just before D-Day. These paratroopers had critical objectives: to secure key bridges and crossroads, disrupt German communications, and prevent the movement of enemy reinforcements. Their successful execution of these tasks played a vital role in facilitating the main amphibious assault on the beaches of Normandy. This operation highlighted the strategic value of airborne forces in establishing a foothold, creating disarray among enemy ranks, and setting the stage for larger ground offensives. The Allied use of airborne troops in Normandy and other operations not only demonstrated their tactical effectiveness but also underscored their ability to significantly impact broader military operations.

Dwight D. Eisenhower speaks with American paratroopers of the 502nd Parachute Infantry Regiment, 101st Airborne Division on the evening of June 5, 1944.
Dwight D. Eisenhower speaks with American paratroopers of the 502nd Parachute Infantry Regiment, 101st Airborne Division on the evening of June 5, 1944

Market Garden

The Allied operation known as Market Garden, initiated in September 1944, stands as one of the most ambitious airborne operations of World War II. This operation saw thousands of Allied paratroopers and glider troops deployed deep into enemy-held territory in the Netherlands with the objective of capturing a series of bridges across the Rhine. The plan was to create a corridor through which ground forces could advance into Germany, potentially shortening the war. However, despite the audacity and scale of the airborne assault, Market Garden faced significant challenges. Difficulties in communication, unexpected German resistance, and issues with logistical support culminated in the operation not achieving its ultimate goal. The failure to secure the crucial bridge at Arnhem, famously termed “a bridge too far,” highlighted the limitations and risks associated with such large-scale airborne operations. Market Garden, while showcasing the bravery and skill of airborne troops, also served as a sobering lesson in the complexities of coordinating air and ground forces in extensive operations against a prepared enemy.

Waves of paratroops land in the Netherlands during Operation Market Garden in September 1944.
Waves of paratroops land in the Netherlands during Operation Market Garden in September 1944

During World War II, airborne operations, while tactically innovative, were fraught with technological and logistical challenges. These operations required precise coordination between air and ground forces, often in hostile and unpredictable environments. One significant challenge was the accuracy of drops. Paratroopers were frequently scattered far from their intended drop zones due to factors like weather, anti-aircraft fire, and navigational errors, complicating mission objectives and unit cohesion. Additionally, the limitations of period aircraft in terms of range and payload capacity posed constraints on the number of troops and the amount of equipment that could be deployed simultaneously.

Logistically, sustaining airborne forces once they were on the ground presented another set of challenges. Resupply drops were essential but risky, as misdrops could leave troops without critical supplies or even deliver them to the enemy. Communication equipment, crucial for coordinating with main ground forces and calling in reinforcements or supplies, was often bulky and unreliable. Furthermore, the vulnerability of airborne troops during the initial phase of the operation required rapid consolidation and movement towards objectives, which was not always feasible due to the aforementioned issues.

These technological and logistical hurdles were not only operational concerns but also influenced strategic decision-making regarding the deployment and objectives of airborne units. The lessons learned from these challenges contributed significantly to the evolution of airborne warfare tactics and technology in the subsequent years.

Operation Varsity

In March 1945, the Allied forces launched Operation Varsity, a pivotal moment in airborne strategy during World War II. It stands as the largest single-day airborne operation in history, involving a massive deployment of American and British airborne forces. The operation’s primary objective was to secure key positions east of the Rhine River, thereby aiding the ground forces’ push into Germany. Unlike previous airborne operations, Varsity was characterized by improved coordination between airborne and ground forces, reflecting the lessons learned from earlier missions like Market Garden.

This operation showcased the maturation of airborne warfare techniques. Enhanced communication, refined logistics, and improved tactics led to a more effective utilization of airborne troops. Notably, the operation demonstrated the capability of airborne units to seize and hold critical areas until the arrival of ground reinforcements. The success of Operation Varsity played a significant role in breaching the formidable Rhine defenses, marking a crucial step in the Allied advance into the heart of Germany. This operation not only underscored the strategic importance of airborne forces in overcoming entrenched enemy positions but also cemented their value in combined arms warfare.

C-47 transport aircraft drop hundreds of paratroopers as part of Operation Varsity
C-47 transport aircraft drop hundreds of paratroopers as part of Operation Varsity

Beyond Notable Battles

Throughout World War II, airborne forces played a pivotal role in shaping the course of numerous battles and campaigns, demonstrating their strategic value beyond the famous operations like Normandy and Market Garden. These units, with their ability to be deployed deep behind enemy lines, were instrumental in disrupting enemy supply lines, capturing strategic points, and creating confusion within enemy ranks. Their actions often laid the groundwork for larger ground offensives, showcasing the effectiveness of airborne troops in various combat scenarios.

In addition to the well-documented major operations, there were numerous smaller, yet significant, airborne operations that contributed to the Allied war effort. These lesser-known operations, ranging from reconnaissance missions to targeted assaults on specific objectives, highlighted the versatility of airborne units. For instance, operations in the Mediterranean theater, the drops supporting partisans in occupied territories, and various other special operations missions played crucial roles in the broader context of the war. These operations, though not as prominent in the annals of history, were vital in demonstrating the adaptability and wide-ranging utility of airborne forces in different combat environments.

The impact of airborne troops in World War II went far beyond immediate tactical successes or failures; it represented a paradigm shift in military strategy and paved the way for future developments in airborne warfare. The lessons learned and the experiences gained from both the major and minor operations of this era significantly influenced post-war military doctrines and the evolution of airborne forces in the years to come.

In assessing the role of airborne troops in World War II, their impact extends beyond major operations to include numerous smaller yet crucial missions. These operations demonstrated the versatility and strategic significance of airborne forces, shaping military tactics and outcomes. As we conclude this chapter, we turn our attention to the post-war era in Part 3, where airborne units evolved further, adapting to new challenges and technologies in the Cold War and beyond.

Note: All images used in this blog post are sourced from Wikimedia Commons.

--

--

Military Minds
Military Minds

Published in Military Minds

Welcome to Military Minds, your source for deep insights into military history. We shed light on the strategies, tactics, events, and figures that shaped 20th-century warfare, from armored conflict to combined arms tactics.

Sina Taghva
Sina Taghva

Written by Sina Taghva

"Software engineer with a passion for 20th century military history, strategy, and doctrine. Join me as I explore the evolution of warfare.