41 Days without food: a brief break, an update and if you’d like to help
I am have broken hunger strike. For now.
On the 30th and through the 31st day I began collapsing and blacking out due to chest pains.
With a deadline for Luke Flanagan MEP, and his representative Diarmuid O’Flynn, both of who have been helping me in the matter. I briefly broke for clear chicken broth and resumed later.
I finally fully broke the strike with clear chicken broth on the 41st day.
I was forced to break hunger strike as I was required to sort through the chaos of my boxes, and documents, as they had been left by the criminal shipping company Alfa Moving.
I had to search the boxes for European Court of Human Rights documents, yet I was too weak to do anything but sit and lie on the floor in despair at the mess Alfa Moving had left me with.
Close friends shuffled me to food so I could be strong enough to do this.
You can read about the effects of Hunger Strike here
During this time the office of the Finnish Justice Chancellor replied to tell me amongst other things; that they found no wrong doing.
That did they not have the competence to make a decision in the Tom Hedkrok case.
They did mention Salme Sandström had been reprimanded for allowing Pekka Ruokonen to use her work email. They continued to refuse to reply to any mention of hunger strike, and continued to ignore evidence; either blatantly or stating that they, the Finnish Justice Chancellor either;
A) did not understand
B) or that it was out of their jurisdiction, shortly after stating it was their jurisdiction.
Judge Petter Plosila
Judge Petteri Plosila’s court, after changing my appeal date; refused to reply to any emails regarding the case or any notification regarding the Hunger Strike. It appears to be beneath them. Though Judge Plosila did go on holiday for the time that was my actual final appeal date of 07.06.2018
Judge Petteri Plosila’s court has refused to reply to questions regarding the changed appeal date. Judge Petteri Plosila’s court has refused to reply to anything.
Judge Petteri Plosila’s court also refuses reply to further questions regarding Salme Sandström’s conflict of interest. Even though the Finnish Bar Association has reprimanded her. Of course that does not matter, as Judge Petteri Plosila had decided before court that I was not speaking the facts, and was therefore a liar.
Tom Hedkrok and Eversheds
Over the course of this, I discovered Tom Hedkrok was no longer working for Eversheds. Rather abruptly it would seem, as it took some time for him to update his Linkedin with his new job at Fondia Oy
I began emailing Eversheds to ask what this meant regarding the status of Tom Hedkrok’s fraudulent invoices.
This took over a month of emails.
Seven days ago, Eversheds, after apparently blocking one email address, finally made contact, to inform me that, “taking into account all the circumstances, they have cancelled my outstanding invoices.”
All told, with previous payments made, and interest; the invoice was for close to €15,000, with its final amount after payment and interest, an unknown figure.
My invoices…cancelled…just like that…but, nothing wrong happened…
Tom Hedkrok took one case no win no fee at his insistence. After finding police investigation irregularities (they didn’t investigate), witnesses lying, false medical information. After bringing up all these matters, Tom Hedkrok told me, that if I asked any questions about these matters, he would quit the case. I could retain him, only if I agreed not to ask any questions about my case ever again, until it was over.
Tom Hedkrok was fired from the case.
In the second case, the Pekka Ruokonen case, Tom Hedkrok lied throughout, said he had made phonecalls, written letters, filed cases, that he had never filed. He even lied about the existence of Pekka Ruokonen. Pekka Ruokonen, who had been an employer of a number of Tom Hedkrok’s colleagues, and was husband to the ex-head of the Finnish Bar Association, had never practiced law. And more.
“As Tom Hedkrok is no more employed with Eversheds, I am replying to your letter. Mr Hedkrok has acted in your case with due professional care and there has been no criminal or illegal actions. However, please be informed that taking into account all circumstances, Eversheds has cancelled your outstanding invoices.”
Afterwards the Justice Chancellor, and the Finnish Bar Association cleared Tom Hedkrok of any, and all wrong doing. Except, in the case of the Finnish Bar Association — “a few spelling mistakes”. After years.
Eversheds decide to just void the bill?
Just. Like. That.
After all that? After being exonerated by the Justice Chancellor and the Finnish Bar Association.
I was on hunger strike against corruption and negligence in the Finnish Judiciary that enables retired attorneys such as Pekka Ruokonen to make the law up as they go along. To take pictures of me naked and getting dressed, and assault me. To threaten to murder me with a shotgun; to keep me essentially economic prisoner whilst abusing me with racist, and sexualised comments. To expose me to asbestos.
To enable and cover for people like insurance broker Mikko Koskensyrjä (of https://www.riskconsult.fi )to impersonate safety inspectors; bully and harass to cover up the construction fraud he was involved in. To state he can test the safety of things that do not exist (ventilation, sound proofing, etc), that he has not seen, and without any equipment. Amongst other things.
I’m told I was fighting eviction? That’s impossible; I was fighting to leave.
Pekka Ruokonen sued for damages (when none existed) when I attempted to give up the struggle for my deposit, and leave his apartment and sphere of influence. That is a form of indentured servitude; and when it comes to Pekka Ruokonen believeing he has a right to threaten my life, to my naked form and to assault me with no legal repercussions, it becomes a weird form of slavery. One where I have to pay to get myself free, if even, if fully. And the Finnish State is not only enabling bigoted, indentured servitude; it is endorsing it, cynically giving it the thumbs up, and wishing it on and well.
The eviction case came to the conclusion that Pekka Ruokonen be awarded all unpaid rent from the time of his refusing rent receipts; damages, and Salme Sandstrom’s fees to €12,085.63. Maria Flygare was awarded her pay of over or close to €3,000 even though she had been fired for malpractice, with a special note to say that this was a loss to the state, which I had caused.
I was sent the demand for payment before the time to appeal was up. The time for appeal was the 21st of May, and 7th of June for the eviction, and countersuit respectively.
The letter of demand from the court said the window of time for payment was 02.05.2018 to 28.05.2018 — the matter was pre-decided. The payment demand was not printed and posted until the 12.05.2018.
I lodged my appeals on the 21st of May. Judge Petteri Plosila’s court refused them stating the date of appeal was the 27.04.2018.
This date does not appear on the court documents I have, so I can only assume they either changed the date, or for some obscure reason hid it from me
Due to this, I began hunger strike.
There remains €12,085.63 in extortion and fraudulent, court endorsed fees for my ex-landlord, Pekka Ruokonen. He who has threatened to execute me with a shotgun, broken numerous laws, refused to let me leave, defrauded me, taken photos of me naked and getting dressed, subject me to constant sexualised racist abuse, and assaulted me.
There has been no contact from the Helsinki court about the moved appeal dates. They refuse to answer
I am unsure if and when I will resume hunger strike.
I have to finish searching for documents, and sorting the trashed goods Alfa Moving have sent me. Remember; the Finnish State has told me anyone can seize, search, keep and threaten to destroy my belongings, on basic curiosity.
I have been repeatedly informed by the Finnish Judiciary that I am not due basic rights nor human rights.
The Finnish Judiciary, Judge Petteri Plosila, and the Helsinki Police force me into a position where, hunger strike appears to be the only method to say “No” to their bigotry and corruption.
If you would like to help
If you would like to help, clapping each article up to the max 50 and sharing often helps gain traction.
Mysteriously, accounts keep getting shadowbanned on Twitter. If you see one of the articles, liking it and sharing it helps also.
Besides that, if you have the time, here are some emails you can reach;
The court involved:
This is Judge Petteri Plosila, who told me I was lying before court when I stated Pekka Ruokonen had assaulted me.
Refused a postponement after Maria Flygare was fired for malpractice a month before court.
Gave me 60 minutes before court to translate 4 years of documents. This was a suprise 60 minutes as I was not supposed to discover I had that much time; until 60 minutes before court.
When asked about conflicts of interest, Plosila immediately ceased communication in English.
Plosila was happy for me to not understand the court proceedings, nor have representation.
Plosila sent me the demand for money before the date of appeal was up. The window of time was 02.05.2018–28.05.2018 — they did not post it until the 12.05.2018 — the appeals were 21st of June and 7th of May. These were changed to the 27th of April 27.04.2018 after the fact.
petteri.plosila@oikeus.fi
CC his court secretary
tarja.saloniemi@oikeus.fi
title the emails Pekka Ruokonen or Alfa Moving:
Finnish Justice Chancellor: kirjaamo@okv.fi
Finnish Embassy Dublin: sanomat.dub@formin.fi
Juha Sipila, Prime Minister: juha.sipila@vnk.fi
Justice Ministry: oikeusministerio@om.fi
Pekka Timonen: permanent secretary for Minister of Justice pekka.timonen@om.fi
Antti Häkkänen: Finnish Minister for Justice: antti.hakkanen@om.fi
Finnish Bar Association: viestinta@asianajajaliitto.fi
Finnish Bar Association: info@barassociation.fi
Postal addresses if you feel the urge:
Finnish Justice Chancellor: P.O. Box 20, FI-00023 Government, Finland
Finnish Embassy Dublin: Embassy of Finland, Russell House, Stokes Place,
St. Stephen’s Green, DUBLIN 2, D02 KD93, IRELAND
Juha Sipila, Prime Minister: PO Box 23, FI-00023 Government, Finland
Finnish Justice Ministry: PO BOX 25, FI-00023 Government, Finland
Pekka Timonen: permanent secretary for Minister of Justice: PO BOX 25, FI-00023 Government, Finland
Antti Häkkänen: Finnish Minister for Justice: PO BOX 25, FI-00023 Government
Finnish Bar Association: P.O. Box 194 (Simonkatu 12 B 16) FI-00101 Helsinki, Finland
Irish Contacts:
Leo Varadkar, Taoiseach, Republic of Ireland: leoconstituency@taoiseach.gov.ie
Press office for Sinn Fein, left wing Irish political party: press@sinnfein.ie
Mary Lou Macdonald, Irish politician, Sinn Fein: marylou.mcdonald@oireachtas.ie
Editor of An Phoblacht, political minded Irish newspaper: editor@anphoblacht.com
(if I am missing any you think I should add, don’t hesitate to get in touch, thank you)
More:
Insurance broker Mikko Koskensyrjä (of https://www.riskconsult.fi ) appears to be around Twitter trying to get talk about what he has done silenced.
Insurance broker Mikko Koskensyrjä (of https://www.riskconsult.fi ) did not appear to realise Twitter would show me the Tweets he wants me to delete.
You can read about that here
You can reach Mikko to ask him about it and lying to the police, here: mikko.koskensyrja@riskconsult.fi
If you want to ask them why they endorse Mikko’s fraud and harassment and lying to the police. You can reach his employers and co-workers here:
Potential Template for email for Riskconsult.fi
To whom it may concern at Riskconsult.fi,
I have recently been made aware of my friend’s ongoing trouble with one of your employees and colleagues, Mikko Koskensyrjä.
On your website it states that Mikko Koskensyrjä primary interest is the safety and comfort of people within their homes.
As a respected Risk Consultancy; can you answer some questions for me regarding Mikko Koskensyrjä.
If Mikko Koskensyrjä is a respected insurance broker within your company; why has he involved himself with the illegal and unsafe construction of an illegal flamenco hall and venue at Asunto Oy Kristiinankatu n:o 4? If Riskconsult.fi does not endorse this behaviour, why does it continue to employ Mikko Koskensyrjä?
How can Riskconsult.fi endorse Mikko Koskensyrjä’s deliberate actions to protect and interfere with normal safety inspection and construction law in regard to the illegal flamenco hall constructed at Asunto Oy Kristiinankatu n:o 4
Does Riskconsult.fi believe that Mikko Koskensyrjä is able to test the safety of things he has not seen? If so, are all members of Riskconsult.fi able to conduct such tests?
Does Riskconsult.fi believe that Mikko Koskensyrjä is able to test the safety of things that do not exist? For example; my friend was strenuously advised a ventilation duct was safe and to simply change a filter, the ventilation unit was discovered to be a hole in a wall filled with torn t-shirts and socks. If Mikko Koskensyrjä is able to test the safety of things that do not exist; are all members of Riskconsult.fi able to conduct such tests?
Does Riskconsult.fi believe that Mikko Koskensyrjä is able to perform concise and conclusive safety tests including ventilation, and structural, and acoustic safety without any diagnostic instruments, using only his eyes and ears? If so, are all members of Riskconsult.fi able to conduct such tests?
Do all Riskconsult.fi employees judge safety matters by, as Mikko Koskensyrjä once did, by holidays they had in Mexico? If so, does Riskconsult.fi have guide paperwork on what holiday experiences compare to what safety issue? Such as: holiday in Mexico = illegally constructed flamenco hall + asbestos fraud, or holiday in Barbados = extreme fire hazard?
Do all Riskconsult.fi employees believe safety does not matter if they own an apartment in a building?
Do all Riskconsult.fi employees believe exposure to asbestos does not matter if you are either a) low income or b) foreign to Finland?
If Riskconsult.fi employees believe exposure to asbestos does not matter if you are either a) low income or b) foreign to Finland. Does Riskconsult.fi have paperwork and evidence showing that once people are a) low income or b) foreign to Finland, they are immune to asbestos?
As there exists over 25 months of documented proof, including audio proof, of Mikko Koskensyrjä not only helping to refuse, and block private sound tests, but strongly fighting to protect an illegally constructed flamenco hall and venue he knew was constructed illegally and with no safety measures. And then later admitting he knew it was not constructed properly. Do all Riskconsult.fi representatives behave in such a negligent and incompetent manner?
Mikko Koskensyrjä and other owners of Asunto Oy Kristiinankatu n:o 4, instructed Ovenia representative, Ullemaria Hall to act against Ovenia’s stated company language policy, and only communicate in Finnish. Mikko Koskensyrjä has also asked why a foreigner to Finland should be allowed to use state complaint apparatus if they cannot speak Finnish. Do all Riskconsult.fi representatives believe that immigrants to Finland should have no right to complain about safety if they do not speak Finnish?
Do all Riskconsult.fi representatives believe that making false police reports is a viable tactic for dealing with a troublesome immigrant?
Do all Riskconsult.fi representatives believe as Finnish nationals it is their right to be able to lie about and falsify documents when dealing with an immigrant?
Do all Riskconsult.fi representatives conduct campaigns of harassment and lying to cover up their crimes and incompetence?
Do all Riskconsult.fi representatives not care about risk or safety to the same degree as Mikko Koskensyrjä? Or it is only acceptable when it is off contract and to line their pockets?
eagerly awaiting answers to my questions
best regards,
I have been banned from /r/Helsinki and /r/Suomi Reddit because Finnish Reddit users do not believe that crime happens in Finland and clearly if it happens to you and you are an immigrant you are mentally ill.
If you’d like to post articles there and have the time. Or elsewhere you think applicable. It’d help
Besides that and donations for an attorney retainer.
I’m open to any suggestions.
Thank you
and thank you for reading.
Big Love
Mooseville99
Support is really needed now.
The current law firm I had representing me had to be fired due to lying about conflict of interest and straight up lying about connection between them and Pekka Ruokonen and his wife Salme Sandstrom.
If you’d like to support legal fees, please donate.
