Walk the line

Tom Eckblad
Narrowridge
Published in
2 min readApr 7, 2008

Rainy day yesterday. Silvi and I went out for breakfast together while Annie and Ian chilled out; Annie’s chin deep into a Murder She Wrote marathon on Netflix Instant Viewing. I spent much of the weekend revamping my business website, making it more corporate (gack) and minimalist. A bit embarrassed by the *yawn* booooring videos I’ve put up as samples, but — that’s all I’s gots.

Also embarrassed by the cheesy Christian videos up there, but again… Man, I’ve made a lot of crap over the years. Sold out to the man. That’s part of the reason I’ve started my own company, to create videos that I can be proud of and that won’t come with a warning to not watch my videos late at night or before operating heavy machinery.

Lately, I’ve been working with a corporation on the side that is paying enough for me to invest some of the extra money into my own projects, which is pretty stinkin’ exciting. (Thanks, Jim, for throwing the business my way.) I’m looking around for a writer for my philosophy video series; need to find someone who can walk the line between curriculum and documentary. So if you know anyone…

Speaking of walking the line, I’m delving into two books in my attempt to better understand, know, learn about, comprehend, find, discover what Jesus was like, who he was/is, etc. One book was written by an atheist, Jose Saramago and the other by an evangelical Phillip Keller. When Saramago, who wrote the killer book Blindness, published his novel — The Gospel According to Jesus Christ — it was renounced as heretical by almost everyone, Protestant and Catholic alike. Not hard to see why, since, according to Saramago, Joseph was the real daddy.

Keller, best known for his classics A Shepherd Looks at Psalm 23 and Lessons from a Sheepdog, is no doubt a fine writer, and more accurately reflects my own beliefs concerning these events, but, man, some of his book on the life of Jesus that I’m reading — Rabboni — is just downright cheesy. Stuffed crust cheesy. He’s got Mary and Joseph sneaking lovey-dovey looks at each other, Mary not complaining (why add this interpretation) about riding — pregnant — on a donkey across the desert, Joseph a strapping tanned young man, etc.

That’s why I have to read Saramago, a brilliant writer, in the other hand, to balance the story out. Same goes for a lot of other stories or books I read: If I’m holding Kierkegaard in one hand, the other hand’s got Nietzsche.

Of course, I’m defaulting back to the original stories recorded by the Jewish writers of old to give me sure footing on this path, walking the line, struggling along the narrow ridge.

--

--