Building an open access fiber network to make Internet for all a reality

Isfandiyar Shaheen
Feb 5, 2020 · 11 min read
Image for post
Image for post

NetEquity’s mission is to make high speed Internet access affordable for every human within a decade. We believe the best way to accomplish our mission is by building an open access fiber network in every country.

A fiber optic cable has virtually unlimited capacity which implies that it has negligible marginal cost of serving additional users. When a fiber network is financed under a fixed or formula driven investment return structure, its incentive structure becomes aligned with the ideals of open access. Specifically, the price paid to access such a network declines as usage grows. How low this price falls depends on the cost of deploying and financing a fiber network.

To minimize the price paid to access a fiber network, we will:

  1. Deploy fiber along the electrical grid using a technology developed by Facebook and their partners that can deploy fiber at a cost of a few dollars per meter.
  2. Finance the fiber network using a combination of Electric Company and telecom operator cash flows under a fixed or formula driven investment return structure.

Today, the majority of Internet infrastructure is not financed under a fixed or formula driven investment return structure because it was financed by private capital that assumed demand risk to begin with. A notable exception is the East Palapa Ring Project in Indonesia, which is a submarine fiber optic network circling the rural parts of eastern Indonesia.

To finance the East Palapa Ring Project, the Universal Service Fund (USF) of Indonesia assumed demand risk and offered private investors a minimum guaranteed return independent of network usage[1]. This financing structure made it feasible to raise $375 million (5.1 trillion Indonesian Rupiah) and deploy 8,450 kms of fiber for a rural connectivity project.

We have developed a globally scalable business model that can build an open access fiber network in every country within a decade. To develop this model we conducted several hundred interviews with industry experts. These interviews helped us map out relevant stakeholder incentives. In this article we will first present a synthesis of our incentive mapping exercise and then describe how our model works.

Stakeholder incentive mapping

  1. Electric Company
  2. Mobile Network Operator
  3. Internet Service Provide
  4. Universal Service Fund
  5. Debt provider
  6. Equity provider
  7. Management team

Electric Company

In developing markets, electric companies are usually government owned and subsidy dependent. Eliminating subsidies provided to electric companies is a priority of most governments. Enhanced network monitoring capabilities can identify technical losses in the electric grid and diversions such as theft. Fixing technical losses and diversions can lower expenditures, eliminate subsidies and lower end consumer tariff.

Access to a fiber network enhances an Electric Company’s grid monitoring capabilities better than any other communication medium because of fiber’s virtually infinite capacity. Existing fiber deployments along the electrical grid are limited to Overhead High Voltage (OHHV) transmission lines where fiber is most often deployed using Optical Ground Wire (OPGW). Our research shows that Overhead Medium Voltage (OHMV) distribution lines are 8x greater in length than OHHV lines [2]. Secondly, OHHV lines are many tens of kilometers away from households, but OHMV lines are typically less than 250 meters away[3].

Electric companies would benefit from a fiber network along OHMV lines but have struggled to justify the high cost of construction to regulators. Regulators are also hesitant to approve fiber investments because fiber is viewed as a telecom asset and most electric companies lack the know-how to lease fiber capacity to telecom providers. While leasing fiber capacity is a challenge for Electric Company staff, they are well equipped to deploy and maintain a fiber network.

Mobile Network Operators

~10% of an MNO’s towers (mostly urban and fiberized) contribute more than 50% of revenues. ~50% of an MNO’s towers (mostly rural and not fiberized) contribute less than 10% of an MNO’s revenues. Fiberizing rural towers is technically required by MNOs to keep up with data demand but is not desirable by shareholders because rural areas do not have enough paying customers.

Image for post
Image for post
Source: Generalization based on analysis of 10 telecom markets

Telecom regulators were aware of an MNO’s economic incentive to focus on urban areas which is why rural coverage requirements were imposed. MNOs achieved coverage targets but those have not translated into connectivity.

As of December 31, 2018, 3.3 billion people live within a mobile Internet coverage area but are not online[4]. In addition to coverage targets, regulators often impose taxes and/or surcharges to be collected from telecom operators and deposited in a Universal Service Fund (USF). The USF remains underutilized in most countries[5].

While only 10% of MNO towers are fiberized, over ~80% are connected to the electrical grid[6]. This implies that a fiber network deployed by following the electrical grid (referred to hereafter as “NetEquity Fiber Network”) can be shared with MNOs with negligible incremental cost. Thus, a NetEquity Fiber Network will lower an MNO’s expenditures while increasing its network capacity.

Internet Service Providers

When a fiber network is financed under a fixed return structure similar to the East Palapa Ring Project, an ISP’s lack of a scale becomes less relevant for the fiber network owner. Thus, a change in incentive structure makes accessing a fiber network easier for smaller ISPs thereby making it open access in letter and spiri. More importantly, when ISPs avoid capital expenditures related to building a fiber network, service levels for end users improve.

The best example of improved service levels driven by the presence of an open access fiber network is from Ammon, Idaho — a rural town of 15,000 residents. The Ammon fiber network was financed partially by the City of Ammon and partially by Ammon residents.

This Ammon network allows its residents to select an ISP through a virtual marketplace and lets residents switch an ISP within 20 seconds if service level is not satisfactory. For ISPs in Ammon, the shared fiber network is desirable because it virtually eliminates their capital expenditure requirements and let’s them focus on serving customers.

ISPs in Ammon can access this shared fiber network for a fixed fee of $50 / month[7]. This low price point is the result of cost-based pricing followed by the City of Ammon. There are 3 ISPs currently operating in Ammon whereas most rural towns like Ammon have only one ISP. It is worth noting that since the Ammon fiber network was launched, the price of a Gigabit connection fell 10x within 3 years.

Image for post
Image for post
Source: EntryPoint Networks, Inc.

Note: these prices do not include a fixed $17/month payment made the City of Ammon. This payment lets Ammon residents become owners of the fiber cable coming into their homes over a 20 year period. Ammon residents also have an option of buying the fiber cable coming into their homes for a one time payment of $3,000.

Universal Service Fund

A typical USF board is comprised of government officials and telecom industry representatives. This implies that a USF is intimately aware of connectivity demand and is well positioned to assume demand risk of a fiber network. More importantly, a typical USF is cash rich, which means its promise to fund a revenue shortfall will be considered credible by capital providers.

Although over 80% of cell towers are connected to the electrical grid, fiberizing all of them will take some time. Therefore, in the first year of operation a NetEquity Fiber Network’s revenue may be insufficient to cover all costs. Our calculations confirm that the USF of a given country should comfortably be able to cover the resulting revenue shortfall. However, we will ensure that this shortfall is eliminated as quickly as possible.

To eliminate revenue shortfall quickly we will incentivise all stakeholders to maximise the number of cell towers (or endpoints) connected to the NetEquity Fiber Network in the shortest possible time. Specifically, after the USF shortfall is eliminated, the financial benefit arising from more endpoints connected will get shared with other stakeholders as follows:

  1. The Electric Company will get a lease fee discount
  2. MNOs and ISPs will get an endpoint price discount
  3. Equity investors will get a higher financial return
  4. Management team will get a higher performance bonus

The specific apportioning of financial benefit will depend on risks assumed by each stakeholder. As a matter of principle, stakeholders that assume the highest risk will be entitled to a greater share of benefit realized.

Debt provider

A debt provider will give high importance to equity investor quality. Banks will prefer to see well capitalized local business groups as equity investors because such business groups have prior relationships with most local banks. More importantly, involving local business groups reduces project execution risk. For this reason, incentivizing local partners to assist NetEquity during the project development phase will be essential.

Equity provider

A fixed or formula driven investment return structure is desirable because it ensures cost-based pricing. A cost-based pricing structure in a fiber network is desirable from our perspective because it ensures that price per endpoint gets reduced as more endpoints get connected.

When a financially credible entity like the USF assumes demand risk, equity investors become more willing to accept a lower Internal Rate of Return (IRR). For example, emerging market investors in tower sharing companies assume demand risk and therefore target an IRR greater than 25%. However, the same emerging market investors will accept a mid-teens IRR in a project without demand risk.

The earliest equity capital to get involved will expect the highest returns because it will assume maximum risk, in particular project development risk. As a NetEquity Fiber Network approaches “financial close” i.e. a time when all binding contracts are signed, returns expectations of new investors will fall because project development risk will get eliminated.


The major challenge facing a Management team will be during the project development period, which will likely be 3–5 years. Given the likely restrictions imposed by debt and equity investors, Management team members may not realize equity upside for at least 10 years under base case assumptions.

Negotiating majority ownership for Management locally is an ideal but will be challenging because Management may not have capital to invest. Irrespective, ensuring substantial “skin-in-the-game” for a Management team will be essential because of long project development cycles.

Post deployment, Management’s performance bonus will be linked to connectivity indicators such as number of endpoints connected and percentage of fiber deployed in rural areas. As a matter of principle, we will not link Management performance bonus to profitability growth.

How our model works:

  1. Sign a long-term fiber capacity lease agreement with an Electric Company.
  2. Raise long-term debt secured against Electric Company’s lease contract and fiber asset deployed.
  3. Lease excess fiber capacity as wholesale lit-service to telecom providers.
  4. Raise equity capital by offering equity investors a fixed or formula driven rate of return.
  5. Work to convince the Universal Service Fund (USF) to assume demand risk and fund revenue shortfall, if any.
  6. Work to convince USF to subsidize the Electric Company’s lease fee if rural fiber deployments are maximized.
  7. Deploy optical fiber using Electric Company’s labor force and the technology developed by Facebook along Overhead Medium Voltage power lines.
  8. Use Electric Company’s labor force to maintain (passive maintenance only) fiber network.
  9. Reduce Electric Company’s lease fee and endpoint price as more endpoints are connected. Beyond an annual endpoint target, incremental returns will accrue to equity investors and Management.
  10. Transfer the fiber network to Electric Company after a 25 year concession period.

At present we are in discussions with six electric companies in two countries. During 2020 we intend to expand our dialogue in multiple markets. To learn more please visit our website at or write to us at



  1. This figure is an average across 13 markets where we obtained grid data from public filings.
  2. Interviews with electric companies` in the United States, South Africa and Pakistan.
  3. 2018 State of Connectivity by GSMA;
  4. 2013 Universal Service Fund study by GSMA;
  5. Average based on analysis across 10 markets
  6. Unique Model Makes Citizens a Funding Partner in Broadband Network;

NetEquity Networks

Make high speed Internet access affordable for every human…

Medium is an open platform where 170 million readers come to find insightful and dynamic thinking. Here, expert and undiscovered voices alike dive into the heart of any topic and bring new ideas to the surface. Learn more

Follow the writers, publications, and topics that matter to you, and you’ll see them on your homepage and in your inbox. Explore

If you have a story to tell, knowledge to share, or a perspective to offer — welcome home. It’s easy and free to post your thinking on any topic. Write on Medium

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store