Sitemap
Neural Notes

Stay Curious, Stay Informed.

LoRA: Scaling Down Fine-Tuning Without Compromising Power

4 min readFeb 16, 2025

--

In the world of AI, where language models like GPT-4 boast over 1.76 trillion parameters, fine-tuning for specific tasks becomes a daunting challenge. Traditional approaches retrain all parameters, which is computationally expensive and memory-intensive. Enter LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation) — a method that injects efficiency into fine-tuning by introducing a low-rank decomposition for parameter updates. LoRA drastically reduces storage needs, computation costs, and inference latency while maintaining performance levels comparable to full fine-tuning.

What Is LoRA?

At its core, LoRA modifies how weight matrices in large models are updated during fine-tuning. Instead of updating the entire matrix, LoRA approximates updates with low-rank matrices (A and B), keeping the original weights frozen. This method achieves:

  • Significant parameter reduction: LoRA can use as little as 0.01% of the original trainable parameters.
  • No inference latency: By merging LoRA updates with pre-trained weights, the model behaves like a fully fine-tuned system during inference.
  • Scalability: LoRA can adapt massive models like GPT-4 without traditional methods' storage or memory bottlenecks.

How LoRA Works: Breaking Down the Math

  • Matrix Decomposition
    Suppose a dense-weight matrix W_0​ in a neural network maps input x to output h . h=W_0 ​x
    During fine-tuning, the matrix update ΔW is added. h=( W_0​ + ΔW) x
    LoRA approximates ΔW as a low-rank decomposition. (ΔW=BA)
    Here, B and A are trainable matrices of shapes d×r and r×k, respectively, where r≪min⁡(d,k).
During fine-tuning, the matrix update ΔW is added. h=( W_0​ + ΔW) x
LoRA approximates ΔW as a low-rank decomposition. (ΔW=BA)
Here, B and A are trainable matrices of shapes d×r and r×k, respectively, where r≪min⁡(d,k).
  • Parameter-Freezing
    LoRA freezes W_0​ and only optimizes B and A, resulting in fewer trainable parameters. For example, adapting GPT-3’s W0​ with LoRA reduces the number of trainable parameters by over 10,000 times.
  • Inference Optimization
    After training, LoRA merges ΔW back intoW_0, eliminating extra layers or computational overhead during inference.

Why Low-Rank?

The concept of rank in matrices refers to the number of linearly independent rows or columns. By focusing only on the most impactful directions (low rank), LoRA reduces redundancy in parameter updates. This is crucial for:

  • Lowering memory usage.
  • Accelerating computations.
  • Maintaining model performance, as most weight updates have a low intrinsic rank.
GPT-3 175B validation accuracy vs. number of trainable parameters of several adaptation methods on WikiSQL and MNLI-matched. LoRA exhibits better scalability and task performance. See Section F.2 for more details on the plotted data points.

Adapters vs. LoRA: What’s the Difference?

Adapters, another fine-tuning approach, add small neural layers between existing ones in the model. While effective, adapters increase inference latency as they process sequentially. LoRA, on the other hand:

  • Avoids adding new layers.
  • Merges updates into the main model weights.
  • Works seamlessly with parallelizable GPUs, making it more efficient for deployment.

Applications and Performance

LoRA has demonstrated impressive results across various models and tasks:

  • RoBERTa (125M-355M parameters): LoRA achieved competitive scores on GLUE tasks with just 0.3M trainable parameters, compared to 125M for full fine-tuning.
RoBERTa with different adaptation methods on the GLUE benchmark.
  • GPT-3 (175B parameters): LoRA matched or exceeded the performance of full fine-tuning on tasks like WikiSQL and SAMSum while requiring up to 10,000× fewer parameters.
Performance of different adaptation methods on GPT-3 175B.

Visualizing the Benefits

Here’s an example of LoRA’s decomposition in action:

  1. Original Matrix (High Rank):
    A large weight matrix that represents complex relationships.
  2. Decomposed Matrices (Low Rank):
    Two smaller matrices, A and B, capture the essential updates efficiently.
    W0​+ΔW=W0​+BAConclusion: The Future with LoRA

LoRA represents a significant leap forward in making fine-tuning scalable for the next generation of large language models. By focusing on low-rank adaptations, it bridges the gap between efficiency and performance, enabling broader access to powerful AI systems. Whether you’re deploying a massive GPT-3 model or fine-tuning for niche tasks, LoRA ensures you do so without breaking the computational bank.

--

--

Tiroshan Madushanka
Tiroshan Madushanka

Written by Tiroshan Madushanka

Cloud, Distributed Systems, Data Science, Machine Learning Enthusiastic | Tech Lead- Rozie AI Inc. | Research Assistant - NII |Lecturer - University of Kelaniya

No responses yet