My Reaction to Two Recent Pieces on the Concepts of Divine Feminine and Divine Masculine
Krunal Dangar writes in Reverence for the Divine Feminine:
Within all of us, resides two sacred energies — the divine feminine and the divine masculine. The feminine expresses herself in creation, intuition, empathy, and sensuality while action, power, logic, and focus are the expressions of the masculine. When in harmony with each other, they create a numinous state of being that is ethereal.
In The Rise of the Divine Mother, Patrick Paul Garlinger writes: “What the Divine Mother really stands for is our innate relationship to Source.” I agree with this statement, which correlates to Krunal Dangar’s view that creation, intuition, and empathy spring from the Divine Feminine. Garlinger goes on to state:
By contrast, the Divine Father or Masculine is the expression of Source through infinite forms. If the Divine Feminine is the Source from which we all spring, the Divine Masculine is the infinite variety and multiplicity of forms that we can take as extensions of that Source. The fact that human beings, and all other life forms, can take infinite forms, shapes, and permutations is life expanding and proliferating. Diversity of form is the Divine Masculine principle.
