DenseNet

NOCODING AI
NOCODING AI
Published in
5 min readFeb 15, 2023

Summary

DenseNet is a powerful deep learning architecture that uses dense connectivity between layers to boost the performance of convolutional neural networks. This advanced architecture has demonstrated significant efficiency across a wide range of computer vision tasks, such as image classification, object detection, and segmentation. Its use-cases span multiple image-related applications, including face recognition, animal type identification, object detection, cancerous cell identification, among others.
While DenseNets offer numerous advantages, such as high accuracy and exceptional performance, they do come with certain drawbacks. One such drawback is that DenseNets are memory-intensive and require a high computational cost, which can be a challenge for some use-cases.

Description

DenseNet, (Densely Connected Convolutional Networks) is a family of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) that uses a dense connectivity pattern between layers, allowing for better feature reuse and gradient flow throughout the network. This architecture is a well-established pre-trained convolutional neural network architecture widely deployed for image classification tasks and has achieved exceptional performances on a number of benchmark datasets, including ImageNet, CIFAR-10, and CIFAR-100.

Convolutional Neural Network, source: https://cezannec.github.io/Convolutional_Neural_Networks/

Two popular variants of the architecture are DenseNet121 and DenseNet201, both highly effective for image classification tasks. One limitation of DenseNet121 and DenseNet201 is their original restriction to image sizes of up to 224 x 224 pixels with exactly 3 channels input. However, certain variations and implementations of the architecture support larger input sizes. However, some other iterations may support even bigger input sizes but it is important to keep in mind that expanding the input size can increase the model’s memory requirements and computational costs. Therefore, determining the appropriate input size for DenseNets should depend on the specific demands of the application and the hardware resources available.

Use-cases

DenseNet has been particularly effective in tasks where a large amount of data is available, such as:

  • Image classification: DenseNet is commonly used for image classification tasks such as identifying objects in images, recognising faces, or identifying specific types of animals or plants.
  • Object detection: DenseNet can also be used for object detection tasks, which involves identifying the location of objects in images and drawing bounding boxes around them.
  • Medical image analysis: DenseNet121 has been used in medical image analysis tasks such as identifying cancerous cells in mammograms or detecting abnormalities in brain scans.
  • Natural language processing: Although was originally developed for computer vision tasks, particularly for image classification, the underlying idea of DenseNet, which is to densely connect all layers in a network, could potentially be applied to natural language processing (NLP) as well. However, it should be noted that the standard DenseNet architecture may not be directly applicable to NLP tasks without some modifications, such as adapting it to process sequential data.
Types of Computer Vision, source: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/object-segmentation-vs-detection-which-one-should-you-ritesh-kanjee?trk=pulse-article_more-articles_related-content-card

Advantages

  • Better performance with fewer parameters: DenseNet can achieve better accuracy in image classification tasks with fewer parameters.
  • Robust to overfitting: DenseNet’s architecture helps prevent overfitting, which means that it is less likely to make incorrect predictions based on the training data.
  • Strong feature propagation: DenseNet can learn complex representations of images, which can lead to more accurate predictions and better performance in tasks such as image classification.

Disadvantages

  • Increased computational cost: DenseNet can be slower and more computationally expensive to train and run compared to other architectures.
  • Memory-intensive: DenseNet may require more memory to store intermediate feature maps, which can limit the size of the images that can be processed and make it less practical for use on certain devices.
  • Over-reliance on earlier layers: Dense connections may result in limited capacity to learn more complex features in later layers, which may impact its ability to learn certain types of features.

Architecture

DenseNet architecture is based on a series of dense blocks, each containing multiple convolutional layers. Each dense block takes the output of the previous block as input, as well as the outputs of all the previous blocks. This creates a dense connectivity pattern between all the layers of the network, allowing information to flow more efficiently through the network.

The core idea behind the DenseNet architecture is that the feature maps produced by each layer can be concatenated to form the input to the next layer. This means that the output of each layer is the input of all the following layers. DenseNet also uses a transition layer between each dense block to reduce the spatial dimensionality and the number of feature maps. The transition layer consists of a batch normalisation layer, a 1x1 convolutional layer, and a pooling layer.

DenseNet121 vs. DenseNet201:

DenseNet121 and DenseNet201 are two popular variants of the DenseNet architecture. While they share many similarities, there are also some key differences between them in terms of model size, computational complexity, and performance.

  • The main difference between DenseNet121 and DenseNet201 lies in the number of layers they have. DenseNet121 has 121 layers, while DenseNet201 has 201 layers. This means that DenseNet201 is a larger model and has a higher number of parameters. In fact, DenseNet201 has almost twice the number of parameters as DenseNet121, making it a more complex model.
  • DenseNet201 has more layers, which means that it requires more computation during both the training and inference phases. This means that it is more computationally expensive than DenseNet121.
  • DenseNet201 has been shown to outperform DenseNet121 on the ImageNet dataset, which is a widely used benchmark for image classification tasks.

The difference in performance between DenseNet121 and DenseNet201 is not always significant, and depends on the specific application and dataset being used. In some cases, the smaller and faster DenseNet121 may be sufficient, while in others, the increased performance of DenseNet201 may be necessary.

Conclusion

DenseNet is a powerful deep learning architecture that can improve the performance of convolutional neural networks by using dense connectivity between layers. It has achieved state-of-the-art performance on many computer vision tasks and is a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners in the field. However, it is important to be aware of the computational costs associated with using DenseNet and to carefully select the appropriate variant of the architecture for each task.

Reference

Research Paper : https://arxiv.org/pdf/1608.06993.pdf
Keras documentation : https://keras.io/api/applications/densenet/

--

--