Miller, Brexit Documentation
On Tuesday 24 January 2017, the UK Supreme Court ended the legal discussion on the appropriate institution of state to initiate the Brexit process. For those of you who wish to use the legal issues dealt with in this case as part of a comparative analysis, below is a list of legal documents and blog posts that have dealt with the multiple issues the form the legal discussion:
Court Documents
Judgment of the UKSC 24 January 2017
Judgment of the High Court 3 November 2016
Documentation and Transcripts for the UKSC hearing
Blog posts
Kieron Beal QC: The Taxing Issues arising in Miller
Ana Bobic and Josephine van Zeben: Negotiating Brexit: Can the UK Have Its Cake and Eat It?
Kenneth Campbell QC: Sand in the Gearbox: Devolution and Brexit
Robert Craig: Miller Supreme Court Case Summary
Kenneth Campbell QC: How Devolution Has Altered Some Fundamentals of the British Constitution
Hasan Dindjer: Sources of Law and Fundamental Constitutional Change
Sionaidh Douglas-Scott: Brexit, Article 50 and the Contested British Constitution
Sionaidh Douglas-Scott: The ‘Great Repeal Bill’: Constitutional Chaos and Constitutional Crisis?
Sionaidh Douglas-Scott: Miller: Why the Government Should Still Lose in the Supreme Court
Piet Eeckhout: The UK Decision to Withdraw from the EU: Parliament or Government?
Timothy Endicott: Parliament and the Prerogative: From the Case of Proclamations to Miller
Timothy Endicott: ‘This Ancient, Secretive Royal Prerogative’
David Howarth: The Government’s Fatal Concession in Miller
Jeff King and Nick Barber: In Defence of Miller
Campbell McLachlan QC: The Foreign Affairs Treaty Prerogative and the Law of the Land
Paul Reid: Time to Give the Sewel Convention Some (Political) Bite?
Jack Williams: The Supreme Court’s Approach to Prerogative Powers in Miller: An Analysis of Four E’s
