“Bernie Sanders and the Liberal Imagination”
“When a candidate points to high unemployment among black youth, as well as high incarceration rates, and then dubs himself a radical, it seems prudent to ask what radical anti-racist policies that candidate actually embraces. Hillary Clinton has no interest in being labeled radical, left-wing, or even liberal. Thus announcing that Clinton doesn’t support reparations is akin to announcing that Ted Cruz doesn’t support a woman’s right to choose. The position is certainly wrong. But it is hardly a surprise, and doesn’t run counter to the candidate’s chosen name…
I thought #FeelTheBern meant something more than this. I thought that Bernie Sanders, the candidate of single-payer health insurance, of the dissolution of big banks, of free higher education, was interested both in being elected and in advancing the debate beyond his own candidacy. I thought the importance of Sanders’s call for free tuition at public universities lay not just in telling citizens that which is actually workable, but in showing them that which we must struggle to make workable. I thought Sanders’s campaign might remind Americans that what is imminently doable and what is morally correct are not always the same things, and while actualizing the former we can’t lose sight of the latter.”
What is doable and what is morally correct are not always the same things. Please consider disabling it for our site…www.theatlantic.com
I heard this described as the most depressing election campaign of recent memory (Democrats, Republicans, Independents…). And not because of the issues or the negativity between candidates or whatever, just because everyone is sort of incompletely standing for something. Because we aren’t ignoring our cynicisms. It’s all so much in the context of cynicism.